Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/09/2003 7:48:07 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: *bang_list
bang
2 posted on 02/09/2003 7:48:45 PM PST by Mulder (Guns and chicks rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Well the additional receivers and barrels they'd sell would add to their income nicely.
3 posted on 02/09/2003 7:49:25 PM PST by Bogey78O (It's not a Zero it's an "O")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee; Squantos; Inspector Harry Callahan; Jefferson Adams; Shooter 2.5; ...
FYI
4 posted on 02/09/2003 7:50:17 PM PST by Mulder (Guns and chicks rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
"If true, this is a total sellout of gun owners in America."

Well, it wouldn't be the first time...or the last.

This topic is also found here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/839476/posts
5 posted on 02/09/2003 7:56:49 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (Defund NPR, PBS and the LSC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
if true, all I can say is
what a fool
6 posted on 02/09/2003 7:57:32 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
The heck with what Glock did. I'm burning with curiosity to know if Michael Jackson appeared to defend himself. I won't be able to sleep until I know.

(/sarcasm)
7 posted on 02/09/2003 7:58:40 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: phasma proeliator
Glad I didn't go Glock.... hopin the new Springfield takes their market shares.
8 posted on 02/09/2003 7:59:21 PM PST by da_toolman (Vivat Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Dang, and I was thinking about buying one. Oh well.

Maybe they should ask S&W if this strategy works.
10 posted on 02/09/2003 8:06:08 PM PST by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Maybe he is the VP for a reason. Are you sure this is the position of Glock or just the opinion of some guy who makes management decision? BTW glocks are wonderful firearms.
11 posted on 02/09/2003 8:06:16 PM PST by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Doesn't Glock have a mfg. plant in MD - which has a ballistic fingerprint requirement? Sounds to me that they are geared to comply and are looking to squelch the competition.
13 posted on 02/09/2003 8:24:03 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
A couple of things: 1) There are millions of hand guns they will never "fingerprint". 2) The smarter crooks who use autos have a habit of picking up their brass anyway. 3) Revolvers don't eject the casings.
17 posted on 02/09/2003 8:44:07 PM PST by isthisnickcool (Religion of loons...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
You may recall that Glock and Ruger were ready to go lock-step with Smith & Wesson to sell out our rights -- until they heard the fan motor loading up . . .
21 posted on 02/09/2003 9:08:41 PM PST by Crowcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Must be fate. I busted my Glock today for the second time - the "indestructable" Glock, right? Trigger return spring. Crap.

Well, Mr. Kimber hasn't let me down yet.

23 posted on 02/09/2003 9:13:26 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
I'm not a gun nut, and don't even own any guns at the moment. (I also live in a densely populated suburb, Greenwich, CT, where most murders are done with golf clubs by Kennedy cousins, but I digress). Anyway, how hard is it to change the "fingerprint" of a barrel. Could you do it with a coat hanger? just ham it down the barrel to make new striations? Or would it require more?
24 posted on 02/09/2003 9:24:05 PM PST by Koblenz (There's usually a free market solution you know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Knowing this, I'll stick with my 1911.
27 posted on 02/09/2003 9:57:38 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("Yippee Kai Aye......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
It's a shame to see this. S&W, Ruger, Glock...who's next?

I don't own or would not by a Glock. They might well be excellent guns, but uuuuuglyyy!

I do own lot's of S&Ws, Rugers, Colts, Brownings, Remingtons, Winchesters etc., and would hate to see more treacherous behavior like what S&W is now trying to rectify. That's just not good customer relations.
28 posted on 02/09/2003 10:04:15 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Okie by proxy, raised by Yankees, temporarily Californian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdamSelene235
FYI.
29 posted on 02/09/2003 10:13:02 PM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Very old news. A couple of years back the Glock annual had a thing about ballistic fingerprinting and how they worked to prove that it could be effective.
34 posted on 02/10/2003 4:53:31 AM PST by zx2dragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
Didn't Glock hear about what happened to Smith & Wesson when they turned their back on the Second Amendment?
36 posted on 02/10/2003 6:12:55 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mulder
The worst part about the (hit) piece was the "experts" who laughably tried to assert that violent criminals wouldn't bother going to the trouble to alter their weapon's ballistic signature.
41 posted on 02/10/2003 8:50:16 AM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson