Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Gravely Concerned at Iranian Nuclear Program
Reuters ^

Posted on 02/10/2003 1:46:22 PM PST by RCW2001

Mon February 10, 2003 03:57 PM ET
By Jonathan Wright

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States expressed "very grave concerns" on Monday about Iran's plan to enrich uranium for its energy program and said the move only made sense in the context of an attempt to make nuclear weapons.

Iran's atomic energy chief, Gholamreza Aqazadeh, said on Monday the country had started an ambitious nuclear energy program and was poised to begin processing uranium.

On Sunday, President Mohammad Khatami said Iran possessed uranium ore reserves and had begun mining operations in the Savand area, 125 miles from the central city of Yazd.

State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said: "We continue to have very grave concerns that Iran is using its supposedly peaceful nuclear programs ... as a pretext for advancing a nuclear weapons program.

"Iran's ambitious and costly pursuit of a complete nuclear fuel cycle only makes sense if it's in support of a nuclear weapons program," he told a daily briefing.

Iran, a signatory to nuclear non-proliferation pacts, insists its program is purely peaceful and it has invited U.N. inspectors to verify its nuclear facilities later this month.

But the United States has repeatedly questioned the Iranian government's intentions and has lobbied in Moscow to stop the Russians providing equipment and fuel to a nuclear power plant under construction in the southern port of Bushehr.

Last year President Bush included Iran in an "axis of evil." along with Iraq and North Korea, on the grounds that all three were allegedly developing weapons of mass destruction and had links with groups that Washington calls terrorist.

Boucher said the United States was particularly concerned at Iran's announcements because they appeared to contradict assurances that Russia would provide the nuclear fuel and then take all the spent fuel back for reprocessing.

"It puts a goodly part of the nuclear fuel cycle outside the control of whoever is providing the reactor and the fuel... That would only make sense in the context of a weapons program," he said.

IAEA VISIT LATER THIS MONTH

Boucher said the United States urged Iran to sign the additional protocol of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which imposes a tighter supervision regime.

The director-general of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, is due to visit Iran on Feb. 25 and his agency expects to visit two nuclear facilities which came to public attention last year.

"We look forward to Dr. ElBaradei's report at the appropriate time," Boucher said.

In the meantime, he added, the United States would cooperate with other governments to try to prevent Iran from moving toward developing nuclear weapons.

Boucher declined to confirm or deny that U.S. officials met Iranian officials in Europe last month to discuss aspects of a possible U.S. invasion of Iraq.

The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the United States had sought a pledge of humanitarian assistance and an assurance that Iran would not interfere in military operations. Iran denied the report on Sunday.

"We've taken opportunities to discuss items with Iran that are of concern to us, to discuss matters that are in our interests," Boucher said, including previously known contacts which have taken place over the past few years.

He noted that the report said the United States was seeking facilities similar to those it sought during the campaign against the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2001, but he did not confirm that Washington had made a repeat request.

In the case of the Afghan campaign, the United States asked Iran to let it use Iranian territory for search-and-rescue operations and not to let Taliban fugitives cross the border.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/10/2003 1:46:22 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
The title should read....

Iran makes KICK MY A$$ NEXT announcement.

2 posted on 02/10/2003 1:49:57 PM PST by Robe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe
Can you believe this?

For sure, if there were ever any expectations those three would live up to their reputation as Evil, they certainly are being fully met.

3 posted on 02/10/2003 1:51:01 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I would suggest that the United States institute immediate measures to surveil every nation that has any dealings with China. I wouldn't be surprised at all to find that Syria, Lybia, the Sudan, Malaysia or even Panama have some sort of programs going that we're not going to approve of. China is hell bent on helping nations become it's little front men around the planet.
4 posted on 02/10/2003 1:51:11 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 6, Staterooms As Low As $610 Per Person For Entire Week!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
China has a big hand in all this terrorism and nuclear proliferation. The US should definitely look real hard at what the chicomms are doing.
5 posted on 02/10/2003 2:07:53 PM PST by Imperialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
The leftists have been complaining from the git-go about how "artitrary" Bush's Axis of Evil was. Turns out they were wrong .....yet again.
6 posted on 02/10/2003 2:25:46 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe
LOL
7 posted on 02/10/2003 2:26:24 PM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
IRAN!...TAKE A NUMBER...!!!
8 posted on 02/10/2003 2:27:00 PM PST by My2Cents ("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imperialist
I'd place my bets on North Korea playing a major part in this nuclear proliferation, in both Iran and in Iraq! Bush knew what he was talking about when he lumped them all into the Axis of Evil.
9 posted on 02/10/2003 2:28:13 PM PST by My2Cents ("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Hey where's the Greens, we can't even get a clean reactor going here without enviro-BS
10 posted on 02/10/2003 2:40:23 PM PST by this_ol_patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
we are?
11 posted on 02/10/2003 5:38:13 PM PST by Marines981 ("Rattle the big dogs cage and get your a** bit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
>> But the United States has repeatedly questioned the Iranian government's intentions and has lobbied in Moscow to stop the Russians providing equipment and fuel to a nuclear power plant under construction in the southern port of Bushehr.

Our good friends the Russians... Are we done blowing that peace dividend yet?
12 posted on 02/10/2003 7:47:15 PM PST by a_Turk (Ready? Set? Wait!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson