Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Burkeman1
So a nuclear-armed Saddam doesn't bother you in the slightest? No chance that he'll give or sell a nuclear weapon or anthrax to terrorists in your universe I presume. Let's just keep believing that UN commissions will protect us from nuclear proliferation like they prevented India, Pakistan, and North Korea from developing nuclear weapons. Of course Saddam can be contained - we'll hit back after he destroys New York and/or LA unless the peaceniks determine that we deserved it for attempting to remove him from power.
43 posted on 02/11/2003 1:57:53 AM PST by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: garbanzo
No it doesn't bother me in the slitghtest. As it wouldn't seem to bother Bush either. If Iraq blasted off a nuke bomb test tomorrow suddenly we would engage in "constructive dialouge" with him like we are doing now with the far more unstable and insance North Korea and like we do with Pakistan and India. Any talk of war against Iraq qould evaporate tommorrow if Sadaam had a nuke are could really threaten us in any way.
44 posted on 02/11/2003 2:02:45 AM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson