Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garbanzo
No it doesn't bother me in the slitghtest. As it wouldn't seem to bother Bush either. If Iraq blasted off a nuke bomb test tomorrow suddenly we would engage in "constructive dialouge" with him like we are doing now with the far more unstable and insance North Korea and like we do with Pakistan and India. Any talk of war against Iraq qould evaporate tommorrow if Sadaam had a nuke are could really threaten us in any way.
44 posted on 02/11/2003 2:02:45 AM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Burkeman1
The difference is that if Iraq had a nuke to test it would test it in NY City or Washington DC via its friends, or with one of its own agents. Iraq isn't just trying to blackmail us for money as North Korea is doing. Hussein wants revenge.

Hussein's government officials, his diplomats, have been engaged in assorted acts of terrorism wherever possible and they have worked with al Qaeda for years. Iraq's leadership is one which has expansionist aims, which is quite a contrast to Noth Korea's, for example.

TIraq isn't content to just isolate themselves behind a fence and paint aggressive posters to wave at "imperialists."

It's silly to even consider letting a regime like Iraq obtain those weapons. Iraq had the sense to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, and Israel had the sense to bomb Iraq's. The world would be a good deal better off if we had prevented nasty regimes from getting such weapons- if we had, North Korea wouldn't be the cesspool it is. An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure.

46 posted on 02/11/2003 2:19:37 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson