[John H K]

I'd be curious to see his answer to:

1) Why kill as MANY people as possible in the towers and REALLY go out of your way to kill as FEW people as possible with the anthrax, if it was the same people?

2) Why single out Leahy and Daschle as your only government targets if you're Iraq or Al Queda?

And the subject of what facilities would have been needed to produce the anthrax has been the subject of infinite debate, and literally every other article in a reputable news source takes exactly the opposite position from whatever was the previous article over whether vast facilities or a small homebuilt lab could have produced the anthrax.

[EternalHope]

Thought you might find this interesting.

Anyone who wants to know the truth can find it. The problem is, most people do NOT want to know the truth. The implications are too painful to contemplate.

I have not been posting much lately (major illness in the family), but still have time to follow what's going on. Keep up the good work.

[OneLoyalAmerican]

Greetings yonif, FReepers, et al:
What I find most interesting, Iraq admits to possessing anthrax in 1991. Iraq was compelled to destroy all anthrax, but as of this date, the UN has not analyzed and destroyed one spore of Iraqi anthrax.

[Semper Paratus]

Tell it to the FBI who are frantic trying to build a case against that researcher in Maryland.

[MEGoody]

I have long suspected that Iraq was behind the anthrax attacks. Wish we could prove it beyond doubt.

[polemikos]

From testimony before the House Committee on International Relations, Dec 5, 2001

On the 20th of September, 2001, (before the anthrax attacks were known) an article, attributed to Uday (Saddam's son), appeared in Iraq's Babel newspaper that said:

"A virus would attack the raven [America] and it would respond to antibiotics at first, but in later times, would no longer be controlled by antibiotics."

And people wonder why GW has patience.

[Allan]

Bump

[Nogbad]

Ping