[Mr. Jeeves]

"Sexist Republican Pig! How dare you hold that door for me!!!"

[KC_Conspirator]

This is crap.

[tcostell]

There really is no winning is there?

[Mr. Thorne]

Oy vey.

Shoot me now...

[SoDak]

The fact that there was public money lying around to fund a study like this is depressing.

[ClearCase_guy]

The participants reporting high support for chivalry gave more favorable ratings to homemakers and less favorable ratings to career women ... suggesting that chivalrous men ... disapprove of women who ... are high in competence

I think this whole thing is stupid. The above "logical" chain of supposition on the part of the researcher really shows that they are pushing an agenda and grasping at straws to do so.

[Cicero]

Radical feminists have protested against having doors held for them for at least thirty years. And now this guy does a study--well funded with tax money, no doubt--to confirm it.

One more instance of a researcher finding what he wanted to find in the first place. Besides, if he had found anything else, he would never get another research grant or promotion.

Politically correct scholars are little better than lemmings.

[Jeff Chandler]

...disapprove of women ...who are low in virtue.

What?! Dissapprove of somebody's lack of virtue? How unenlightened. Next thing you know, people will start to approve of virtue. That could lead to standards of behavior, which could lead to intact families, which could lead to well-adjusted children, which could lead to a decrease in the need for counseling, which could lead to the unemployment of professors of psychology.

[cicero's_son]

"The soft chivalry of low expectations"

[HitmanLV]

LOS ANGELES (Reuters Health) - Chivalry isn't all it's cracked up to be, suggests new research showing that men who hold doors for women also tend to hold sexist views about them.

Heaven knows I do! I haven't gotten many complaints about it in my time, either.

[Sir Gawain]

What do you tell a woman with two black eyes?

Nothing, you already told her twice!

;-)

[Junior]

Destroying the last vestiges of culture and civility, that's what this is all about...

[B-Chan]

Fine. I'm a sexist. So what?

[First Amendment]

The belief that women are less competent and powerful than men explained both chivalry --that women must be protected and provided for by men--and sexist beliefs that women are not qualified for high-power positions, the researchers concluded.

There is so much to dissect here - I am really angry about this crap. These sick sexually confused people should not get a PENNY of public money. The feminist agenda is ruining families and millions of lives. I know. I was in Berkely at one of the first "women's liberation" meeetings in 68 or 69.

Feminazis are angry, lesbian, hateful bitches who want to destroy God's natural order. It is very very sad and dangerous that this kind of horse s**t is being crammed down kids' throats in school and media. Girls nowadays - and boys - are indoctrinated with this psychotic nonsense. "Feminism" means: Women have the right to be (and should be) sluts, they should be lesbians, and they must hate men. They must have abortions, and the result is millions of bastard children. And men can have sex any old time with any woman and feel no repsonsibility. After all, why keep a cow at home when you can buy milk in the market? I really hate this c*p.

No wonder kids are totally confused and can't form relationships. They don't know what a normal marriage looks like.

Why can't they see that men and women have different psychologies and different roles? Answer: they want to detroy society since they are envious of the Creator.

[Middle Man]

What's amusing is how many women in the workplace who expect discriminatory hiring practices, set-asides and quotas in their favor are still shocked and floored when men don't treat them with courtesy and deference anymore.

[Freedom4US]

Those morons just don't get it. Women and children are the most precious thing in the world. Once one loses that crucial bit of common sense, or worse, if one never even recognizes that little factoid, it's a long slide into absurdity.

[Dan from Michigan]

No, I ought to slam the doors in their faces. I'm sure they will appreciate that!!!

Who the hell is this Altermatt guy, anyway?

[Alkhin]

I, a woman, have found that men are just as nice to me when I hold the door open for them as they are when they see me coming and hold the door open to me. I LOVE IT when they do!

I will chase down the first feminazi who gripes about it, too. THEY will get an earful, to say the very least!

[MARTIAL MONK]

Come quickly and bring a candle. The forces of chivalry have been reduced to doormen.

[ZULU]

"The participants reporting high support for chivalry gave more favorable ratings to homemakers and less favorable ratings to career women and sexually permissive women than the low-chivalry participants did."

So, he wants us to prefer sluts and women who don't want to raise families??

These psychologists should be kept in padded cells somewhere - maybe in Iraq.

[Billthedrill]

Me, I hold the doors anyhow, because I durn well feel like it. The women it pleases are worth pleasing, the women it pisses off are worth pissing off. The opinions of idiots such as our psychologist friend I don't care about, because they're not worth caring about.