Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SMU NVAR and TXAR Infrasound of Explosion of Space Shuttle Columbia
SMU ^ | 13 February 2003 | David P. Anderson

Posted on 02/14/2003 6:43:40 AM PST by pwatson

SMU NVAR and TXAR Infrasound of Explosion of Space Shuttle Columbia

Southern Methodist University seismologists Gene Herrin and Petru Negraru analyze the infrasound signals from the TXAR and NVAR arrays of the re-entry of the Space Shuttle Columbia, 01 February, 2003.

A sign on the 635 expressway in Dallas on the afternoon of February 1st, 2003, alterting the public to the presence of shuttle debris. Eric Yundt took some pictures.

National Weather Service radar got clear images of the path of the debris. Ed Okerson assembled the images into a gif animation.

Here are infrasound records from the NVAR array in Mina, Nevada, and the TXAR array in Lajitas, Texas, of the re-entry of the Space Shuttle Columbia on 01 February, 2003.

The above image shows the sound pressure wave, what seismologists call the 'N' wave, better known as a "sonic boom," as the shuttle passed over the array at Mina, Nevada. The signal was recorded at about 13:58 GMT. Full resolution versions of the image are available for download. Here (852k) is a TIF file, and Here (51k) is a GIF file.

Compare this image with the sound pressure N wave below, recorded 21 February 1997 as the STS-82 shuttle mission passed over the TXAR array. There appears to be some unusual unexplained high frequency content in the Columbia's signal, as contrasted with the comparatively clean 'N' signature of the STS-82 recording.

Source: "Seismic Precursors to Space Shuttle Shock Fronts", G.Sorrells, J.Bonner, E.Herrin http://www.birkhauser.ch, Vol 159 (2002)

The following data were recorded by the TXAR array, about 500 miles south of Dallas, as the Columbia passed over north Texas. The N wave is not seen from a passage at distances greater than about 100 miles.

The signal was recorded at about 14:30 GMT. It shows a gradual ramp up of signal followed by a series of sharp events that appear to be explosions, somewhere between 7 and 12 separate events, with one widely spaced small event near the end. It took the sound wave about 30 minutes to arrive at the infrasound array in Lajitas, Texas. Best estimate of real-time for the first large peak is 13:59, the same time that NASA lost the telemetry signal. Here (872k) is a TIF file, and Here (123k) is a GIF file.

Calculation of the azimuth (angle to the source) of the peaks of the signal recorded at TXAR by the SMU team show that, though the peaks are spread across about 11 minutes, during which time the shuttle would have traversed a few thousand kilometers, the azimuths all came from the same direction, within a few degrees. This indicates to the seismologists that these are not separate explosions, but rather multiple paths, more properly 'refractions,' of a single explosion. That event appears to have occurred at 13:59.4 over west Texas about halfway between Lubbock and Amarillo, at an altitude of about 62 kilometers.

Previous simulations of infrasound signals done by researchers at the Los Alamos National Laboratory ("Modeling Study of Infrasonic Detection of 1 kT Atmospheric Blast" by K.A. Dighe, R.W.Whitaker, and W.T.Armstrong) of the stratospheric and thermospheric infrasonic returns from a single explosion show striking similarity to the multi-peak infrasound signals recorded for the breakup of the Columbia at TXAR. Infrasound signals recorded in Canada appear to show similar characteristics. SMU analysts compute the explosion of the Columbia as most likely a single decompressive event.

The image below is a recording (courtesy of Geotech) of the shockwave from the space shuttle Columbia recorded at Dallas. This is the signal that was heard by residents of Dallas and North Texas on the morning of 01 February 2003. The seismologists have determined that it is composed of multiple 'N' waves, sonic booms, created by the re-entry of multiple pieces of shuttle debris after the breakup of the Columbia. The Geotech website includes additional infrasound signals of these multiple N waves.

13 February 2003 David P. Anderson SMU Geodept Archives


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: space

1 posted on 02/14/2003 6:43:40 AM PST by pwatson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pwatson

Infrasound from a normal shuttle landing.

Columbia.


2 posted on 02/14/2003 6:52:05 AM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pwatson
SMU NVAR and TXAR Infrasound of Explosion of Space Shuttle Columbia


Southern Methodist University seismologists Gene Herrin and Petru Negraru analyze the infrasound signals from the TXAR and NVAR arrays of the re-entry of the Space Shuttle Columbia, 01 February, 2003.

A sign on the 635 expressway in Dallas on the afternoon of February 1st, 2003, alterting the public to the presence of shuttle debris. Eric Yundt took some pictures.

National Weather Service radar got clear images of the path of the debris. Ed Okerson assembled the images into a gif animation.
 
 

Here are infrasound records from the NVAR array in Mina, Nevada, and the TXAR array in Lajitas, Texas, of the re-entry of the Space Shuttle Columbia on 01 February, 2003.

The above image shows the sound pressure wave, what seismologists call the 'N' wave, better known as a "sonic boom," as the shuttle passed over the array at Mina, Nevada. The signal was recorded at about 13:58 GMT. Full resolution versions of the image are available for download. Here (852k) is a TIF file, and Here (51k) is a GIF file.

Compare this image with the sound pressure N wave below, recorded 21 February 1997 as the STS-82 shuttle mission passed over the TXAR array. There appears to be some unusual unexplained high frequency content in the Columbia's signal, as contrasted with the comparatively clean 'N' signature of the STS-82 recording.

Source: "Seismic Precursors to Space Shuttle Shock Fronts", G.Sorrells, J.Bonner, E.Herrin http://www.birkhauser.ch, Vol 159 (2002)

The following data were recorded by the TXAR array, about 500 miles south of Dallas, as the Columbia passed over north Texas. The N wave is not seen from a passage at distances greater than about 100 miles.

The signal was recorded at about 14:30 GMT. It shows a gradual ramp up of signal followed by a series of sharp events that appear to be explosions, somewhere between 7 and 12 separate events, with one widely spaced small event near the end. It took the sound wave about 30 minutes to arrive at the infrasound array in Lajitas, Texas. Best estimate of real-time for the first large peak is 13:59, the same time that NASA lost the telemetry signal. Here (872k) is a TIF file, and Here (123k) is a GIF file.

Calculation of the azimuth (angle to the source) of the peaks of the signal recorded at TXAR by the SMU team show that, though the peaks are spread across about 11 minutes, during which time the shuttle would have traversed a few thousand kilometers, the azimuths all came from the same direction, within a few degrees. This indicates to the seismologists that these are not separate explosions, but rather multiple paths, more properly 'refractions,' of a single explosion. That event appears to have occurred at 13:59.4 over west Texas about halfway between Lubbock and Amarillo, at an altitude of about 62 kilometers.

Previous simulations of infrasound signals done by researchers at the Los Alamos National Laboratory ("Modeling Study of Infrasonic Detection of 1 kT Atmospheric Blast" by K.A. Dighe, R.W.Whitaker, and W.T.Armstrong) of the stratospheric and thermospheric infrasonic returns from a single explosion show striking similarity to the multi-peak infrasound signals recorded for the breakup of the Columbia at TXAR. Infrasound signals recorded in Canada appear to show similar characteristics. SMU analysts compute the explosion of the Columbia as most likely a single decompressive event.

The image below is a recording (courtesy of Geotech) of the shockwave from the space shuttle Columbia recorded at Dallas. This is the signal that was heard by residents of Dallas and North Texas on the morning of 01 February 2003. The seismologists have determined that it is composed of multiple 'N' waves, sonic booms, created by the re-entry of multiple pieces of shuttle debris after the breakup of the Columbia. The Geotech website includes additional infrasound signals of these multiple N waves.





13 February 2003 David P. Anderson
SMU Geodept Archives

3 posted on 02/14/2003 6:58:11 AM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
Thanks for answering a question that I had asked several times in the past week, which no one could respond. I was also looking for a correlation of the volume of the sonic boom relative to the mass for the individual debris parts and probability of debris fields in areas of house shaking sonic booms or shortly down stream of such.
4 posted on 02/14/2003 7:34:20 AM PST by Deguello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: *Space
Space ping. Quite literally, yet sadly so.
5 posted on 02/17/2003 7:31:53 AM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson