Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US GIVES IRAQ ANOTHER MONTH
NewsMax ^ | Saturday, Feb. 15, 2003 | Stewart Stogel

Posted on 02/15/2003 11:32:16 AM PST by nocommies

U.S. Gives Iraq Another Month Stewart Stogel Saturday, Feb. 15, 2003 United Nations -- Yielding to increased pressure by the UN Security Council, the Bush administration has unofficially given Iraq another month to comply with UN demands to disarm. During a private session of the Security Council on Friday, the US did not block a request by UN chief arms inspector Dr. Hans Blix to be given a month for Iraq to devise a mechanism to destroy prohibited missiles found in its possession.

"He asked for the time and we had no objection," explained one US official at the closed meeting. Another diplomat in attendance also confirmed the US account.

Calls to the UN arms chief's office were not returned.

Blix's plan on how to deal with the missile issue has two parts:

First, Baghdad has been given an "opportunity" to "react" to UNMOVIC's (UN Monitoring, Observation and Inspection Commission) findings that the al-Samoud II missile violates Council sanctions.

Second, within 30 days, Iraq must present to the UN arms chief a plan on how it intends to dispose of the illegal missiles in conformity with UN resolutions.

This effectively puts off any US military campaign until mid-March confirm State Dept. officials.

"One way or another these missiles will be taken care of next month," one official added.

Coincidentally, broadcast reports with US Navy officials confirmed that the Pentagon needs approximately three more weeks to ship additional tanks and helicopters to the Gulf.

The controversial al-Samoud missile is believed by the UN to have a range slightly exceeding the 150 km ermitted under UN resolutions.

Iraq first mentioned the missile problem in a declaration made to the UN last October.

During a visit to Baghdad last month, Blix was provided with extensive information on the design and of firing tests of the missile by the Iraqis.

The declarations were then referred by the UN to an independent group of missile engineers who released their findings to a meeting of UNMOVIC's executive board in New York on Wednesday.

While the missile's extended range of 25 miles is not necessarily strategic in its ability to hit any new major cities or military bases in the region, it could become a factor if used against US forces should war break out, confirms a US diplomat.

Baghdad explains the problem by claiming that the al-Samoud's tests were with missiles not fully loaded with an explosive warhead and guidance system.

When fully equipped, the Iraqis claim the al-Samoud does not violate UN resolutions.

The UN rejected the Iraqi claims, but has again asked Baghdad to respond to the findings.

The missile debate capped a day Secretary of State Colin Powell would just as soon forget.

Powell sat through more than three hours of open and some closed lectures by countless foreign ministers at the special Council meeting to hear an "update" by Blix and IAEA (atomic inspectors) chief Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei.

Both men told the Council they believed that arms inspections "were working" and that they have found no "convincing" evidence Iraq was currently "cheating" and hiding weapons of mass destruction.

Blix also questioned the "accuracy" of some of the "intelligence" evidence Powell presented to the Council last week.

Blix insisted that to date his people have found "no evidence" of Iraq trying to actively conceal prohibited weapons or obstructing any arms inspections.

The foreign ministers of France, Russia, China and Germany quickly jumped on the Blix report to insist that the time for war (with Iraq) has still not come.

One aide to U.S.ambassador John D. Negroponte insisted that Powell did not have a bad day.

The aide insisted that the Council was finally "becoming aware" that events are moving towards a "conclusion."

He added that the Council members are maneuvering for more time to decide "domestically" on how they will have to deal with the "inevitable."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blix; iraq; powell; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-339 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2003 11:32:16 AM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nocommies
Source and link?
2 posted on 02/15/2003 11:33:27 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: nocommies
1 month does ensure all allied forces will be in place to launch an invasion...not much of a consession.
4 posted on 02/15/2003 11:35:12 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
I dont know where to begin. As discouraging as our patience has been, I must also ask: How come its taking us so long to be "ready" shipping our troops and equipment to the gulf? Are we really this weakened by x42's reduction in our military?
5 posted on 02/15/2003 11:35:51 AM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
Please post a link and source.
6 posted on 02/15/2003 11:36:39 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/2/15/133558.shtml

oops!
7 posted on 02/15/2003 11:36:50 AM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
In a month Saddam will be chewing off his advisors' finger nails.
8 posted on 02/15/2003 11:38:09 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
Thank you. I updated your header. Please remember to link your source.
9 posted on 02/15/2003 11:38:29 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
NEWSMAX
10 posted on 02/15/2003 11:38:31 AM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
Source and links, please.
11 posted on 02/15/2003 11:38:41 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
Well, isn't that special..While I doubt this report somewhat, the longer we delay, the more we are at risk. If we are going to do this, then DO THIS - delay means subjecting our troops to intolerable heat and disadvantage and a delay in our victory - more casualties, which is exactly what the lefties want. Media sharks will swarm adn gloat around the body bags instead of mourning them. This is unbelievable.
12 posted on 02/15/2003 11:38:51 AM PST by ysoitanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Admin Mod at work ... never mind.
13 posted on 02/15/2003 11:39:16 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
No. Kill Saddam now. The longer we wait, the longer he has to prepare, and the more likely it is our brave lads will face a tougher time.

Regards, Ivan

14 posted on 02/15/2003 11:39:52 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
Thanks.
15 posted on 02/15/2003 11:39:57 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
Same old shi* different day.
16 posted on 02/15/2003 11:40:01 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
It took about six months for the buildup to the first gulf war. While we've had material prepositioned, it's coming up to about 4 months or so now.
17 posted on 02/15/2003 11:40:38 AM PST by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
we have been slow in preparations, if you ask me, all other things aside, we keep hearing about the weather thats going to get hot as blazes over there soon, we dont seem to be too panicked at all by it. is it a problem, or not? if it is, why arent we ready to go NOW???
18 posted on 02/15/2003 11:40:52 AM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lavocat
Humm. Sounds good.

Not the first time I've heard that or felt it myself....in the last 12 years!

19 posted on 02/15/2003 11:41:24 AM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
I hope this is pure disinformation. The hot weather is going to become a factor very soon, and this plays right into the hands of Iraq (and France and Germany). If our troops weren't ready for another month, that would be one thing. But I highly doubt that's the case.
20 posted on 02/15/2003 11:41:55 AM PST by NYS_Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-339 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson