Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to punish German 'treachery'
The Observer (U.K.) ^ | 02/16/03 | Peter Beaumont, David Rose and Paul Beaver

Posted on 02/15/2003 4:00:02 PM PST by Pokey78

America is to punish Germany for leading international opposition to a war against Iraq. The US will withdraw all its troops and bases from there and end military and industrial co-operation between the two countries - moves that could cost the Germans billions of euros.

The plan - discussed by Pentagon officials and military chiefs last week on the orders of Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld - is designed 'to harm' the German economy to make an example of the country for what US hawks see as Chancellor Gerhard Schröder's 'treachery'.

The hawks believe that making an example of Germany will force other countries heavily dependent on US trade to think twice about standing up to America in future.

This follows weeks of increasingly angry exchanges between Rumsfeld and Germany, in which at one point he taunted Germany and France for being an irrelevant part of 'old Europe'.

Now Rumsfeld has decided to go further by unilaterally imposing the Pentagon's sanctions on a country already in the throes of economic problems.

'We are doing this for one reason only: to harm the German economy,' one source told The Observer last week.

'Our troops contribute many millions of dollars. Why should we continue to support a country which has treated Nato and the protection we provided for decades with such incredible contempt?'

Another Pentagon source said: 'The aim is to hit German trade and commerce. It is not just about taking out the troops and equipment; it is also about cancelling commercial contracts and defence-related arrangements.'

The Pentagon plan - and the language expressed by officials close to Rumsfeld - has horrified State Department officials, who believe that bullying other countries to follow the US line will further exacerbate anti-Americanism and alienate those European countries that might support a United Nations resolution authorising a war.

German industry earns billions of euros every year from supporting the US Army Europe which, although reduced from its Cold War heights, still totals 42,000 troops and 785 tanks - almost three times as many as the British Army owns. Many of these soldiers and their fighting equipment, including Apache helicopters, have already been sent to the Gulf.

German industry is heavily involved in supporting the US presence. Among the defence companies which stand to lose out are missile-maker Diehl, aerospace and defence giant EADS Deutschland, armaments maker Rheinmetall and vehicle maker Krauss-Maffei Wegmann.

There is also a US Air Force contingent of about 15,000 service people with bases at Bitburg, Frankfurt-am-Main and neighbouring Ramstein, where the commander doubles as part of the Nato command. This force includes nearly 60 F-16 fighter-bombers and a squadron of A-10 tank-buster aircraft.

Rumsfeld and his staff have made no attempt to hide their fury at Schröder's 'treachery and ineptitude' over Iraq. Last week Schröder leaked to reporters a Franco-German plan for avoiding war by increasing the number of UN weapons inspectors before informing his American counterparts.

'After this, Germany is finished as a serious power,' one of the sources added. 'This is simply not the way to conduct diplomacy at a moment of international crisis.' One diplomatic source said Rumsfeld was 'furious at Germany. He is a bruiser and it looks as though he means to do it'.

Under these plans, the US would move its troops in Europe eastwards to countries such as Poland, the Czech Republic and the Baltic states, all of which have strongly supported America's line against Saddam Hussein. It is likely that the overall size of the deployment would be reduced, as the US military changes its priorities for a long-term and disparate engagement with international terrorism.

Although Rumsfeld had already been considering a redeployment of US troops around the world after a war in Iraq to save money and respond to new threats, the plans now under consideration go far beyond what had been discussed.

It is likely that future years will see a sharp increase in the proportion of special forces troops able to deploy rapidly across the globe.

Germany would suffer considerable financial loss if US forces were withdrawn from the country. The bases provide jobs for local people as everything from administrators to cleaners, and are huge customers for dairy products and bread.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last
To: longjack
>> Which translation do you think would be the most effective, the article, or the commentary?

I think the article offers more substance. The reader can render their own opinion based on the facts in the article and it having been published in a German paper exposing Schroeder..

Shame, shame Herr Schroeder..
161 posted on 02/15/2003 9:19:53 PM PST by a_Turk (Ready? Set? Wait!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: LibservitiveRepublicrat
2003-02-05
162 posted on 02/15/2003 9:31:38 PM PST by VaBthang4 (Jeremiah 51;24 "..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
I am all for punishing Germany and France, and I hope that the USA will give them just what they deserve. I have German ancestory, and I am ashamed of that bunch. So put them on the shi* list, and keep them there, until they straighten up.

I totally agree with you. I still have relatives there. My sister and her family and my brothers and their families, plus my cousins and their families live there. I am also ashamed of that bunch

163 posted on 02/15/2003 9:37:31 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: americanbychoice
I also wanted to thank you for the link to the Frankfurt Allgemeine Sonntagzeitung. Most enlightening article!

They are still saying "We are not convinced" even though their own CIA equivalent told them about that and food poisoning on the 9th of August 2002.

I read the whole thing and didn't find reference to the food poisoning bit, but my German's getting rusty these days. Can you point me to where it is in this article, or is that bit in another German news article?

Anyway, the article you cited ended with this:

Als eine der wichtigsten westlichen Industrienationen und aufgrund der unzureichenden Bevorratung ist Deutschland als weitgehend ungeschütztes Land ein besonders "attraktives" Ziel für bioterroristische Angriffe.

My rough and probably bad translation:

As one of the most important industrial nations in the West, which is to a large extent an unprotected country due to its insufficient stocks of [smallpox vaccine], Germany is a particularly a "attractive" target for bioterror attacks.

Hmm.

Now here's the part of the article I find chilling:

Den deutschen Sicherheitsdiensten liegen dokumentierte Erkenntnisse vor, daß Pockenerreger außerhalb der offiziellen Labore in Atlanta und Koltsovo illegal, z. B. in Rußland, Irak und Nordkorea, gelagert werden. Ebenso gibt es Hinweise darauf, daß sich Terrorgruppen um die Herstellung biologischer Kampfstoffe bemühen.

Again, my poor translation:

German intelligence agencies present documented findings that smallpox pathogens are illegally stored outside the official laboratories in Atlanta and Koltsovo, e.g. in Russia, Iraq and North Korea. There is likewise reference to the fact that terrorist groups strive to produce biological agents.

164 posted on 02/15/2003 9:44:04 PM PST by wonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: LibservitiveRepublicrat
We're big so we need more enemies.

Now, I think a Big Brother marshall law state sounds good.
Yet, I'm a libertarian on many topics. Why is that?
We have mostly free speech and a damn good blue print that works.
I know my choices already align. So I'm "more" free than someone who may, say, want to impose some socialist system.
Protecting the constitution == protecting your freedom.
165 posted on 02/15/2003 9:57:24 PM PST by nanomid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
Yes, we disagree, but kicking the legs out from under an ally's economy in a fit of pique is idiotic.

Not if they have transitioned from being an ally to being an ADVERSARY.

It is time to face up to the fact that France, Germany, and Belgium are no longer our friends. And this is not just about Iraq. Trouble was brewing long before this, and an eventual falling-out was inevitable. The biggest mistake we could make is to continue operating as if they are still our allies, and that this is an alliance that needs to be "saved." It is already dead, and the sooner that we face up to that fact and act accordingly, the better off we will be.

166 posted on 02/15/2003 10:05:17 PM PST by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Tailback
'All you GI's stationed in Germany don't panic! Czech beer is just as good as German and Czech girls are friendlier!'

Great point, I married a half Czech half Polish gal (from Pennsylvania) Never tried the beer but the girls are just right

167 posted on 02/15/2003 10:14:09 PM PST by Borderline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
The truth of the matter is that Britain, Iceland, Spain, Italy, and Turkey are the ONLY European countries in NATO that are REALLY of much strategic importance to us; Portugal, Denmark (including Greenland) and Norway might possibly also be added to that list, but they are much more marginal -- the main importance with them is to not fall into hostile hands. All of these provide direct access by sea and avoid any serious overflight problems. Spain, Italy, and Turkey especially are all much closer to places where our forces will be likely to be needed. Britain and Iceland are essential for naval security in the N. Atlantic, with Norway, Denmark and Portugal being of secondary importance.

Poland and the Czech Republic become important if "keeping the Russians out of Europe" is an important strategic objective for us. I'm not sure at this point if it really is. "Keeping the French/German axis from linking up with the Russians and dominating Europe" might be a more realistic and important strategic objective.

I see absolutely no good reason why we should continue to need any US forces in Germany.

168 posted on 02/15/2003 10:20:46 PM PST by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: solo gringo
My Wife said today that her and her family [ 2nd generation germans] has lived with the stigma of being germans.Most people had starting to accept.Then along comes a D#ck head like gerhardt shitt#r and it all starts all over again.

The problem isn't with the Germans over here, but rather with the Germans over there. THE DECENT ONES IMMIGRATED!

169 posted on 02/15/2003 10:23:11 PM PST by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jt8d
" Less you forget today's throbing horde of entranced Huns...."

I believe that Nazi era was an aberration. I think the real driver behind the move toward "Fortress Europe" are the French.

After the Iraq situation has been settled I think it essential that US begin to use whatever diplomatic levers we have at our disposal toward steering the EU away from the "Strong federal" model that the French are pushing. Failing that we may be forced to form a rival trading area with some the "New Europe" countries along with the Brits.
170 posted on 02/15/2003 10:46:51 PM PST by ggekko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The redeployment of troops would be explained on grounds of defense policy, not grounds of economic retaliation.

100% accurate. This silly article is like many, a cliched attempt to feed the Euro perceptions of a bullying "Cowboy Republic" in the USA.

171 posted on 02/15/2003 10:53:28 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Allan
If this threatened invasion of Iraq is just a hoax why should the US be so upset with France and Germany? Aren't these countries just helping them out with their plan?

I don't think it's just a hoax. We really are threatening an invasion, and the invasion will eventually come. It just isn't going to come tomorrow.

As for France and Germany, I have the impression that they aren't intentionally helping the U.S., that we're merely taking advantage of what we know their policy to be. I think that the U.S. government is, in fact, genuinely perturbed at the willingness of the body politic in France and Germany to dump their ties with the U.S., but we'll make the best we can of it.

I don't think the whole thing is just a pretense or charade, since it would be difficult to make the relationships with France and Germany whole again afterwards, given that the charade could never be openly admitted.

I have the feeling, however, that Russia may be different, that Putin may possibly be consciously cooperating in this bizarre game. But I don't know, maybe Chirac is too. (I find it hard to believe that Schröder is being purposely helpful, but I guess there might be other elements in the German government who are.)

172 posted on 02/15/2003 10:53:35 PM PST by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
F_____ 'em. There are others who LOVE us and will be glad for our business. As my parents used to say; "Why bother if there is someone else who does appreciate you?"

Didn't when I was a kid but makes sense to me now.
173 posted on 02/16/2003 2:31:40 AM PST by JSteff (Use common sense and look at history first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Who cares what they call it, just do it. Besides it is even more painful and a bigger slap when you give them a barely veiled excuse.
174 posted on 02/16/2003 2:33:43 AM PST by JSteff (Use common sense and look at history first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Seems lick the Bulgarians would love to have us there.
175 posted on 02/16/2003 2:35:02 AM PST by JSteff (Use common sense and look at history first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tailback
And just as good looking.
176 posted on 02/16/2003 2:37:31 AM PST by JSteff (Use common sense and look at history first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sd-joe
Isn't that right. When the French, Soviets, and others wanted to bleed the Germans after WWII it was us who prevented that. We are why their inital recovery was so fast after the war.

We had a large part in making them, they need to see what it is without us.
177 posted on 02/16/2003 2:42:20 AM PST by JSteff (Use common sense and look at history first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LibservitiveRepublicrat
But those who CLEARLY circumvent our wishes we do not need to deal with any longer. Period.

Part of libertarianism is that you do business with who you want, when you want, and no one tells you that you need do do it for any reason.

That is only the case here. If what their policies are are contrary to our's we do not need them any longer. There are loads of other countries who do want us so WHY NOT take advantage of those situations that work to our favor?

Libertarian is very much a market based ideology. Isn't that part oflibertarian thought? Free use of capital will help to shape a better world by bringing in line those who don't provide what is needed within the guidelines of a lawful society?

That is all that is happening here.
178 posted on 02/16/2003 2:54:43 AM PST by JSteff (Use common sense and look at history first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: eno_
"Oops, we only meant to realign our alliances to more relevant areas. Sorry about the economy thing. Hey, how about I buy a cookoo clock?"

LOL and how I would like to see it happen.
179 posted on 02/16/2003 2:56:39 AM PST by JSteff (Use common sense and look at history first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jpthomas
Budweiser comes from Budweis. Now known as Budvar.
The Czech had a large group of Germans in their country, that´s why Hitler took the Sudetenland and short after that the whole Czech Republic.
180 posted on 02/16/2003 3:02:33 AM PST by Michael81Dus (You have (had) G. Bush, J. Cash, B. Hope & S. Wonder - we have Schröder: no cash, no hope, no wonder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson