Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India Knight: Well, pardon my breasts
The Sunday Times ^ | March 2, 2003 | India Knight

Posted on 03/01/2003 3:28:37 PM PST by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: unspun
LOL! That's fried CHICKEN, not fish!
41 posted on 03/01/2003 7:30:29 PM PST by annyokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Well, just be careful not to lean into the pan, yourself! - unless you're tall enough that it doesn't matter.
42 posted on 03/01/2003 7:33:50 PM PST by unspun (The most terrorized place in America is a mother's womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Tempest in a teapot. There is nothing more natural than a mama breastfeeding her baby, fercryinoutloud. The Lovely Wife has nursed all seven of our babies (still nursing #7, as a matter of fact). Does she just whip out a boob while shaking hands at a cocktail party? Hardly. Never ceases to amaze me how discreetly she can nurse the baby darned near anywhere......and no one is the wiser.
43 posted on 03/01/2003 7:39:53 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
This is natural and people just need to get over it.

So you won't mind if my spouse and I 'go for it' in our front yard? How about in the booth next to you at Red Lobster?

Check the seat at that booth first. After all, taking a dump is "natural" too. Right?

44 posted on 03/01/2003 7:45:19 PM PST by A_perfect_lady (Not being a perfect lady at the moment, obviously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"We know that bosoms’ primary purpose is to feed infants,"

Wrong, but thanks for playing our little game.

L

45 posted on 03/01/2003 7:47:48 PM PST by Lurker (When I want your opinion, I'll beat it out of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Breastfeeding is natural...Whatever your views on breastfeeding, it would be absurd to deny women the right to feed their children in public.

Well, urinating and defecating and having sex are natural, too, but they're not something you do in public.

46 posted on 03/01/2003 7:55:50 PM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
..not as confused as an Australian state parliament, though, which last week evicted Kirstie Marshall, a 33-year-old MP, for breastfeeding her 10-day-old daughter Charlotte in the chamber. Apparently this was because under some convenient antiquated law, Charlotte was a “stranger” to the house and therefore banned....

That's really misleading.

The Speaker had already arranged for a small antechamber to be available for Ms Marshall, in the event that she needed to breastfeed her baby. She did not avail herself of that option: my guess, due to the opportunity she'd be passing up, for a little feminist provocation.

47 posted on 03/01/2003 8:05:19 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Baby is hungry. Your just horny. You can wait. Feeding a baby and your sex act are not the same.
This would be like comparing breathing with scratching my ass.
48 posted on 03/01/2003 8:24:27 PM PST by earplug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MeekMom
Urinating and defficating are natural and " heathy " too. I don't want to see those healthful and natural activities done in public either. Did GOD creat us to defficate, urinate, and engage in sexual confgress in public view, during working hours, as well ? Why should one be ashamed to do those things out in the open ? hey, what about clothes ? GOD created Adam & Eve naked and so were we all born naked. Oh, I know, the expulsion from Eden; however, we counterman GOD's decree about pain, during childbirth , as well.

Mothers, who breastfeed in public, are exhibitionistic feminists. You're " silly " to think that any " natural " act should not be hidden from view. You get over it !

49 posted on 03/01/2003 9:42:11 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
it would be absurd to deny women the right to feed their children in public.

I know of no such 'right', nor of any that protects exposing oneself in public.

50 posted on 03/01/2003 10:33:07 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Can anyone say "Extremist needs a chill pill?"
51 posted on 03/01/2003 10:35:29 PM PST by MeekMom (( Please visit http://CNLGLFG.com) (HUGE Ann-Fan!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MeekMom
Yes, dear; so take one or two, or three. You do need to " chill out " some. ;^ )
52 posted on 03/01/2003 10:51:31 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I don't believe it! You posted a whole thread about breasts, and hardly any pictures! *L*
53 posted on 03/02/2003 2:08:01 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Here you go
54 posted on 03/02/2003 2:14:34 AM PST by xm177e2 (smile) :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
LOL! Good one
55 posted on 03/02/2003 5:33:09 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
Check the seat at that booth first. After all, taking a dump is "natural" too. Right?

Eew! Okay, now I'm uncomfortable right here in the privacy of my own home.

56 posted on 03/02/2003 5:34:09 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MeekMom
This is natural and people just need to get over it.

Sex is natural, too. But something tells me you would object to that in public. Not flaming, just pointing out the discrepancy......

57 posted on 03/02/2003 5:38:01 AM PST by cardinal4 (Hollywood celebs are not relevant to Foreign Policy or National Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
What!? No pictures of the lady PM?

5.56mm

58 posted on 03/02/2003 5:43:20 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
PM=MP Sheesh!!

More coffee is needed.

5.56mm

59 posted on 03/02/2003 5:44:16 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
We know that bosoms’ primary purpose is to feed infants, but we also live in a breast-obsessed society...

Allow me to set the record straight on this bit of oft-repeated claptrap. Mammary glands certainly do exist in order to feed mammals (get it?) but human breasts are sexual organs. To illustrate: a non-lactating human has much larger breasts than a lactating gorilla. Why? Because the size and roundness of human female breasts exist to entice the male--no more, no less. As a matter of fact, large pendulous breasts are actually a hindrance to successful breast feeding in that they can easily cover the nostrils of the feeding infant (infants obviously need to breathe through their noses while they nurse).

So, guys, if you like boobs, it is because God or Darwin (pick one or both) made it just so.

My favorite breast-delivery individual: Salma Hayek

60 posted on 03/02/2003 5:51:54 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson