Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi drone 'could drop chemicals on troops'
The London Times ^ | March 8, 2003 | James Bone

Posted on 03/07/2003 5:59:08 PM PST by BurbankKarl

Iraqi drone 'could drop chemicals on troops' From James Bone in New York

A REPORT declassified by the United Nations yesterday contained a hidden bombshell with the revelation that inspectors have recently discovered an undeclared Iraqi drone with a wingspan of 7.45m, suggesting an illegal range that could threaten Iraq’s neighbours with chemical and biological weapons. US officials were outraged that Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, did not inform the Security Council about the drone, or remotely piloted vehicle, in his oral presentation to Foreign Ministers and tried to bury it in a 173-page single-spaced report distributed later in the day. The omission raised serious questions about Dr Blix’s objectivity.

“Recent inspections have also revealed the existence of a drone with a wingspan of 7.45m that has not been declared by Iraq,” the report said. “Officials at the inspection site stated that the drone had been test-flown. Further investigation is required to establish the actual specifications and capabilities of these RPV drones . . . (they) are restricted by the same UN rules as missiles, which limit their range to 150km (92.6 miles).

Colin Powell, the US Secretary of State, told the Security Council in February that Washington had evidence that Iraq had test-flown a drone in a race-track pattern for 500km non-stop.

In another section of the declassified report, the inspectors give warning that Iraq still has spraying devices and drop tanks that could be used in dispersing chemical and biological agents from aircraft. “A large number of drop tanks of various types, both imported and locally manufactured, are available and could be modified,” it says.

The paper, obtained by The Times, details the possible chemical and biological arsenal that British and US Forces could face in an invasion of Iraq. The paper suggests that Iraq has huge stockpiles of anthrax, may be developing long-range missiles and could possess chemical and biological R400 aerial bombs and Scud missiles, and even smallpox.

Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, told his fellow Security Council Foreign Ministers that the document was a“chilling read”.

General Powell resorted to reading passages from the paper out loud in the Council chamber. He pointed out that it chronicled nearly 30 times when Iraq had failed to provide credible evidence to substantiate its claims, and 17 instances when inspectors uncovered evidence that contradicted those claims. But his draft copy, dating from a meeting of the inspectors’ advisory board last week, did not contain the crucial passage about the new drone.

The decision by Dr Blix to declassify the internal report marks the first time the UN has made public its suspicions about Iraq’s banned weapons programmes, rather than what it has been able to actually confirm. “Unmovic has credible information that the total quantity of biological warfare agent in bombs, warheads and in bulk at the time of the Gulf War was 7,000 litres more than declared by Iraq. This additional agent was most likely all anthrax,” it says.

The report says there is “credible information” indicating that 21,000 litres of biological warfare agent, including some 10,000 litres of anthrax, was stored in bulk at locations around the country during the war and was never destroyed.

The paper, a collection of 29 “clusters” of questions for Iraq, offers some reassurance about Iraq’s missing botulinum toxin, which Unmovic believed is “unlikely to retain much, if any, of its potency” if it has been stockpiled since 1991.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Illinois; US: New York; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: drone; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 03/07/2003 5:59:08 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
I thought that Iraq was disarming?
The sky is falling again.
Does the UN know?
2 posted on 03/07/2003 6:01:46 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *war_list; Ernest_at_the_Beach
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
3 posted on 03/07/2003 6:03:21 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
Iraq doesn't have any chemical weapons. Tom Daschle said so.
4 posted on 03/07/2003 6:04:18 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Blix is an ass. Sorry, I don't mean to insult donkeys.
5 posted on 03/07/2003 6:06:28 PM PST by fatidic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fatidic
I can't even begin to understand how Blix can give the report that he did today knowing what was in this report.

6 posted on 03/07/2003 6:09:40 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Glad no Republicans listen to Dasshole, or we probably be under Chinese rulership....LOL
7 posted on 03/07/2003 6:10:02 PM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
Anybody know the overall effectiveness of gas under actual combat conditions?Based upon WWI experience gas does not seem to be the most effective of weapons. In all of WWI only about 20,000 casualties 5,000 deaths(from memory. Wind conditions as to velocity and direction, rain,airborne dust etc. all effect the use of gas.
8 posted on 03/07/2003 6:13:50 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: BurbankKarl
James Bone? Not James Bond?
10 posted on 03/07/2003 6:16:33 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
Is that one of the drones commonly available from the Acme Company?
11 posted on 03/07/2003 6:18:17 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Saddam Hussein has already taken care of it...many times.
12 posted on 03/07/2003 6:18:22 PM PST by IVAXMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
The name's Bone, James Bone. (aka Spooky)


13 posted on 03/07/2003 6:21:34 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
**The omission raised serious questions about Dr Blix’s objectivity.**

This omission and about 75 others.

Prairie
14 posted on 03/07/2003 6:21:58 PM PST by prairiebreeze (One, two, three, dip, two, three. No Blixie, we've decided we don't want to dance with you anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
In that case we have no worry. It only works on wily coyotes.
15 posted on 03/07/2003 6:22:03 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Blix knows. He just has interests that lie elsewhere. His pocketbook to be exact.

He's being bought and the US and UK are being sold down the river.

Prairie
16 posted on 03/07/2003 6:23:32 PM PST by prairiebreeze (One, two, three, dip, two, three. No Blixie, we've decided we don't want to dance with you anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

17 posted on 03/07/2003 6:24:21 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
So how is a UN Inspector held accountable for lying?
18 posted on 03/07/2003 6:27:17 PM PST by Calpernia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
So? Is this a reason for Bush to kill Iraqi babies?

Oh look ... a troll.

19 posted on 03/07/2003 6:27:45 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
So? Is this a reason for Bush to kill Iraqi babies?

No, it is Saddam that will kill the Iraqi babies with this. Just watch. He will use it on his own people and then try to blame us.

And, he will send it to Israel and try to wipe out farms and such with them.

20 posted on 03/07/2003 6:31:06 PM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson