Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RICK SANTORUM VS. HILLARY CLINTON REGARDING PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION LIVE NOW!!!
CSPAN2 ^

Posted on 03/12/2003 11:58:16 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat

CHECK IT OUT! RICK SANTORUM IS LAYING IT ON THE LINE!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: evil; pba; pbaban2003
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 621-632 next last
To: mabelkitty
Does Hillary have a financial investment in PBA clinics?

They have a financial investment in her.

221 posted on 03/12/2003 1:06:13 PM PST by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Maeve
I agree. There are some who have carry the soul of Satan, and you can see it in their eyes. Don't give them the pleasure of becoming intimidated by evil - it can be destroyed!
222 posted on 03/12/2003 1:07:14 PM PST by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
When I heard Mort Kondracke the other night on Brit Hume's show say he believed there was a spiritual war going on between good and evil -- well my eyes popped open. Because that is exactly how I feel. We must fight that spiritual war, and we must win.
223 posted on 03/12/2003 1:09:49 PM PST by Maeve (Siobhan's daughter and sometime banshee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
More lies from NARAL...


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 10, 2003


Senate Fast-Tracks Ban on Abortion Procedures
Bill is Deceptive, Vague and Unconstitutional

Statement of NARAL Pro-Choice America President Kate Michelman

Washington, DC — "Anti-choice Senators are continuing their drive to end legal abortion, this time by attempting to criminalize safe abortion procedures. So-called 'partial-birth' is a political, not medical, term coined by anti-choice forces attempting to debate about freedom of choice with deceptive and inflammatory rhetoric. Make no mistake; this bill goes directly to the heart of a woman's constitutional right to choose.

"This bill not only injects the government into private, medical decisions, but bans more than one procedure and lacks an exception to protect woman's health. In fact, Senator Santorum's bill contains the very same constitutional flaws as the ban struck down by the Supreme Court in Stenberg v. Carhart (2000).

"Anti-choice lawmakers and President Bush are steadily advancing their agenda of using the government to make abortion illegal and unavailable. The truth is, when medical decisions are needed, only the woman and her doctor should decide - not politicians or the government.

"Respected medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists, the American Medical Women's Association and the American Nurses Association, among others, oppose these bans. As a matter of fact, when voters in three states (CO, ME, WA) considered these bans by referendum; all three failed. Clearly, when the American public understands the extreme, deceptive and vague nature of these proposals, they reject them."

CONTACT: Jenny Backus or Deborah Bagocius at (202) 973-3032.

224 posted on 03/12/2003 1:10:08 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Santorum asks Hitlery if she would like to determine which babies are fit to be born and which aren't.

Sorry, but even I can answer that.

I'm sure Hillary! replied that the MOTHER has that right.

Now, what makes HER God--since there are other people involved after the nine months is up--I don't know, but that is their sanguine reply.

225 posted on 03/12/2003 1:10:08 PM PST by Illbay (Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
I agree. She made two mistakes here - she came out strongly FOR PBA, and she called the aforementioned fetuses in the womb "babies".

Two very amatuer mistakes that deviate from DNC/NARAL doctrine.
226 posted on 03/12/2003 1:10:11 PM PST by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Thank you for Hillary's numbers.. I faxed all of them as well and addressed them Mrs Bill Clinton.
227 posted on 03/12/2003 1:11:05 PM PST by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
I sincerely pray that it is never my fate to stand face to face with Harkin, clinton, Boxer, or Kennedy, but most especially Boxer, because as God is my witness, I'm not certain I could restraint my actions toward her. The Devil comes as an angel of light, seeking whom he may devour ... he's already got several who continue to defend the indefensible, using every devious trick he can inspire them to employ.
228 posted on 03/12/2003 1:11:19 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Anti-choice lawmakers and President Bush are steadily advancing their agenda of using the government to make abortion illegal and unavailable

I thought that it was ok to by anti? Isn't it American to be anti?

229 posted on 03/12/2003 1:12:17 PM PST by mattdono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
Because the Senate shall not endorse the opinion of any religion.
230 posted on 03/12/2003 1:12:38 PM PST by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine
Vote update?
231 posted on 03/12/2003 1:12:39 PM PST by Ogie Oglethorpe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
The only life that is important to this scab on the a$$ of humanity is one that can contribute MONEY to her worthlessness.
232 posted on 03/12/2003 1:12:44 PM PST by i are a cowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Hillary is NOT very smart. That was another media lie put out by her "friends" during Bill Clinton's first run for President. They are very good at getting their message out regardless of what they claim about not being able to get anyone to carry it for them. That's another lie. They employee people for that very reason. It's called the BIMBO squad. DUH!
233 posted on 03/12/2003 1:13:23 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
You pose an interesting question. Unfortunately I can no longer post the material I found during deep searches of Boxer, Murray, and Lautenberg regarding their re-election funds from fetal harvesting companies, and yes, they did have such listed on their disclosure sheets you just had to know the holding company ID's to make the connections.
234 posted on 03/12/2003 1:13:51 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
WE NEED TO STOP FOCUSING ON THE WHOLE 'PARTIAL BIRTH' ABORTION AND FOCUS ON WHAT THE PROCEDURE REALLY IS- THEY INDUCE LABOR, AND HALFWAY THROUGH SUCK THE BABY'S BRAIN OUT- THAT PART SHOULD BE MADE ILLEGAL AND PUNISHABLE BY MURDER CHARGE.

IF THEY WANT TO REMOVE THE BABY "FOR THE HEALTH OF THE MOTHER", OK- JUST DON'T STOP HALFWAY THROUGH AND KILL THE BABY REMOVE IT WITHOUT KILLING IT!!!

235 posted on 03/12/2003 1:14:04 PM PST by Mr. K (looking for love in all the right places (not left))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Ogie Oglethorpe
They're still voting.
236 posted on 03/12/2003 1:14:34 PM PST by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Freepmail it to them...
237 posted on 03/12/2003 1:15:23 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Yep, Hillary would reply that it's the Mother's right to choose whether to kill her baby by PBA. In ancient Rome it was the father's right to decide whether to kill the newborn by exposure. What a long way we have come in 2000 years.
238 posted on 03/12/2003 1:16:18 PM PST by colorado tanker (beware the Ides of March)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Ogie Oglethorpe
Zell Miller just voted no (that's a good vote)
239 posted on 03/12/2003 1:16:58 PM PST by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Hillary is NOT very smart.

There is something, YOU KNOW, about the way, YOU KNOW, Hilary speaks, YOU KNOW, that, YOU KNOW, I can't quite put my, YOU KNOW, finger on. It's, YOU KNOW, one of those things, YOU KNOW, you would not expect from "the smartest woman in the world" to say. YOU KNOW?

She also has a very trashy mouth. "F" this, "F" that.

240 posted on 03/12/2003 1:17:01 PM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 621-632 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson