Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair: War by Wednesday
scotland on sunday ^ | 3/15/03

Posted on 03/15/2003 7:08:58 PM PST by knak

TONY Blair has told his Cabinet to brace itself for war on Iraq as early as Wednesday, in the clearest signal yet that hopes of a diplomatic solution have disappeared.

Speaking just hours before setting off for today’s ‘war summit’ with the American President George Bush, a grim-faced Prime Minister warned military action without the backing of United Nations was only days away.

Downing Street last night admitted that the prospects of a diplomatic end to the stand-off with Saddam Hussein were receding rapidly in the face of continuing French opposition to any compromise resolution that could trigger military action.

Yesterday the Prime Minister embarked on a last-minute round of telephone diplomacy in a desperate bid to rescue the proposed second resolution which, if passed, could legitimise a military campaign to remove Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction.

But he will today join Bush and Spanish prime minister Jose-Maria Aznar in the Azores for a meeting in which they are expected to abandon attempts to win UN approval and thrash out final plans for an invasion of Iraq next week.

While Blair met with his Cabinet, the armed forces minister Adam Ingram, meeting with European defence ministers in Greece, agreed that war was now only "a matter of days" away.

The East Kilbride MP said: "I think the language which has been used over recent days in London would lead us to that conclusion."

Last night senior Ministry of Defence sources confirmed they were ready for the order to send the 30,000-plus British force massed on Iraq’s borders into action as early as Wednesday.

The expectation of an imminent attack was heightened by yesterday’s arrival of hundreds of tonnes of heavy munitions at the front in northern Kuwait.

British soldiers readying themselves for war in the Gulf were advised "now might be a good time" to make compassionate telephone calls home. They were also told to prepare to destroy documents, photographs and other items that might link them to family and friends in the event of capture.

Yesterday, Iraq submitted new documentation to the chief weapons inspector Hans Blix which it claims proves that its VX chemical agents were destroyed 12 years ago. The move was dismissed as "more game playing" by the British government.

Blair’s decision to go to war even if he fails to secure UN backing is expected to lead to the loss of two Cabinet ministers: Clare Short and Robin Cook. He will also have to face a growing rebellion among Labour MPs.

Rebels within his own party are planning to force a House of Commons debate on the crisis on Tuesday, and predict the vote against the government’s policy will dwarf the 121 recorded in a similar motion last month.

Yesterday, in Scotland, the health minister Malcolm Chisholm also broke ranks and voiced his opposition to the war.

Foreign secretary Jack Straw also admitted that the impasse in the UN now made war "more probable".

Privately he conceded that British efforts at the UN to agree a resolution setting disarmament benchmarks for Saddam, with which he would quickly have to comply or face an invasion, have effectively failed. Britain has so far failed to secure the support of the six wavering members of the security council need for a majority.

The pessimistic prediction of imminent war came hours after Bush made a landmark announcement committing his government to kick-start the Middle East peace process by rushing forward a ‘route map’ laying down proposals to create a Palestinian state within two years. The initiative was partly intended to win over support from the undecided nations that could provide the US and UK resolution with a majority on the UN Security Council.

But Washington last night made it clear that hopes of forcing through a resolution were fading, as Bush himself told Americans in a radio address that "there is little reason to hope that Saddam Hussein will disarm".

One senior source in the US state department laid bare the perils of pursuing the diplomatic route any further: "There are only two diplomatic options left: submit a resolution to the UN Security Council that will be defeated, or at the very least vetoed by France; or withdraw the resolution because it faces defeat. Either way, the US goes to war," said the source.

There is still bitter resentment among British ministers at France’s position, in particular the "intransigence" of French president Jacques Chirac. Yesterday Blair made no attempt to conceal his fury in Cabinet after the French foreign minister Dominique de Villepin insisted that his country would veto any resolution which authorised military action against Iraq.

Last night a Downing Street spokesman said: "Everyone recognises things aren’t looking good.

"There is nothing that we have heard from the French that indicates that their position has changed. That is hardly the behaviour of a country that believes in a multilateral international regime."

Labour Party chairman John Reid said de Villepin’s remarks were "disappointing".

Addressing the party’s eastern conference in Clacton, after seeing the Prime Minister, Reid said that French intransigence made further diplomacy "very, very difficult" but added: " We will continue to work hard to change minds and get that second resolution."

Blair is expected to allow a vote on war in the Commons on Tuesday, or Wednesday at the latest. Downing Street expects a huge number of Labour rebels, perhaps as many as 160, and at least two Cabinet resignations: Cook, the Leader of the Commons, and Short, the International Development Secretary.

But the Prime Minister still expects to win the Commons vote. He also hopes to be vindicated by the swift fall of Baghdad, the gratitude of the Iraqi people and the discovery of Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction.

Today Blair will fly the 1,500 miles to the Azores amid renewed concerns over his health. Home Secretary David Blunkett spoke of the "the tremendous damage to his health" caused by the crisis.

Officials on both sides of the Atlantic insist the emergency summit is designed to salvage what they can of their second resolution, but many believe the time for diplomacy is over and their talks will amount to a council of war.

Stefan Halper, a former White House aide to four American presidents, said: "What they are doing is making every effort to cover what political liabilities they think they may have as a result of this, whether it be the British public or the Labour Party or anyone else ."

Blair spoke to Reid, his deputy, John Prescott and other ministers at No 10 yesterday to ensure he has the full backing of the Cabinet before flying in to the mid-Atlantic archipelago.

But veteran Labour MP Tam Dalyell claimed Straw had not laid out the legal justification for going to war with Iraq without a new resolution. The Linlithgow MP said: " How can he claim to be upholding UN authority when Kofi Annan, the Secretary General, members of the Security Council and many others are diametrically opposed to his view?"

Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith pledged not to play "political games" and to give his party’s support to Tony Blair as he "does the right thing".


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
didn't see this posted under this title
1 posted on 03/15/2003 7:08:58 PM PST by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knak
Let's roll!...........
2 posted on 03/15/2003 7:13:17 PM PST by soozla (We fought communism, we're fighting terrorism BUT liberalism will bring this country down!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
War threatened by Wednesday, perhaps. But keep the Iraqis awake for a couple of days first.

Sunday would be nice. Make the announcement before the green flag at the NASCAR race.

3 posted on 03/15/2003 7:13:23 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I have a friend who told me it will be Tuesday. He has some connections in D.C. but I don't know how in the know they are. But Tuesday night in D.C. is Wednesday in Iraq.
4 posted on 03/15/2003 7:15:12 PM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knak
I guess no NCAA basketball tourney on TV this year..
5 posted on 03/15/2003 7:16:24 PM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"Make the announcement before the green flag at the NASCAR race"

As long as it's tomorrow and not a week from tomorrow!
6 posted on 03/15/2003 7:24:34 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knak
The U.N. has lost it's opportunity to act, Goerge W. Bush and Tony Blair will lead the world in disarming Iraq and ridding the world of a brutal Dictator as well as setting the Iraqi people free fron tyranny.

I feel the biggest reason why we should remove Saddam from power is not reported enough........

We owe it to those who lost their lives in "Desert Storm" to make sure Saddam lives up to the agreements he signed to allow him to reamian in power. Nobody can say he has and for thhis reason alone, we need to honor our dead by enforcing the cease-fire agreement and remove or kill Saddam Hussain. To hell with all the other uninforced resolutions that the spineless U.N. has declared. Now is the time for leadership and I thank God often that George W. Bush is willing to do what is right for America

7 posted on 03/15/2003 7:26:08 PM PST by MJY1288 (It's Time To Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
Tuesday night - evening rush (ET). Fill yer' gas tanks and stock up on yer beer & popcorn; it's gonna be a long night...
8 posted on 03/15/2003 7:27:30 PM PST by mhking (Fasten your seatbelts....We're goin' in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Last Sunday would've been nicer! Every day that goes by is another 24 hours Saddam's nuclear scientists have had to work. Bye Saddam, don't let the world's door hit you in the ass on the way out!
9 posted on 03/15/2003 7:31:31 PM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knak
The operative phrase here is "by Wednesday." My guess is we'll either be in control of or on the outskirts of Bagdhad by then. Monday night, Tuesday at the latest. JMO.
10 posted on 03/15/2003 7:35:05 PM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon
Question...

Would the "E" bomb neutralize remote detonation capabilities?

11 posted on 03/15/2003 7:37:22 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mitchbert
Nope, the headline doesn't really match the article. Read the first sentence:

TONY Blair has told his Cabinet to brace itself for war on Iraq as early as Wednesday

Baghdad temperatures are supposed to drop from the 80's on Tuesday to the 60's the rest of the week, but windy on Tuesday.

12 posted on 03/15/2003 7:39:35 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
It will be Tuesday then. Those Apaches hate sandstorms (as did I). Besides, what's the rush? I think Wednesday would be perfect. Invite the frog PM, Jackoff Kisiraq, to speak on the cable channels live and one minute into the speech start the war and cut him off.
13 posted on 03/15/2003 7:43:23 PM PST by Beck_isright (going to the war without the french is like duck hunting without your accordian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: knak
Because we have moons this week, I wonder if it wouldn't be more of a surprise if we started the war in the middle of the day.
14 posted on 03/15/2003 7:48:06 PM PST by Defiant (Human Shield Posted in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak; Happygal; MadIvan; aculeus

"It's a rat trap, Saddam, and you've been caught."

15 posted on 03/15/2003 7:49:13 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
OH ewing don't worry there going be some NCAA game not alot if you want see the games it going be on ESPN 1 and 2
VH-1 and MTV show some of it CBS own Viacom who own MTV

RATS my weekly Osbournes espiode be premept
16 posted on 03/15/2003 7:50:01 PM PST by SevenofNine (Get ready for SMACKDOWN Saddam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jane
You could be right; 6:00 p.m. CST tuesday here is 00:00 A.M. GMT Wednesday in the U.K.

Let's roll!
17 posted on 03/15/2003 7:50:58 PM PST by KaiserofKrunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
CBS says NO games will be on MTV or VH1
18 posted on 03/15/2003 7:56:56 PM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
bttt
19 posted on 03/15/2003 7:58:54 PM PST by The Wizard (Demonrats are enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Contradiction noted, thanks. Another mixed signal, and there have been many. Still, my sense is earlier. Oh well, I've been wrong many times before...:-)

Thoughts with the troops, eh.

20 posted on 03/15/2003 7:59:43 PM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson