Terminate Ann Coulter's syndication

proislam.com ^ | Unknown | Unknown

[End Times Sentinel]

Terminate Ann Coulter's syndication

Ann Coulter has long been considered one of the worst syndicated columnists in history.  Not only is she incapable of critical thinking, but her writing style is banal and full of witticisms that could easily be attributed to an eleven-year old.  Nevertheless, some companies still feel that they need to carry her venomous rants.  I should point out that National Review, a magazine renowned for its very conservative slant and its bloodthirsty anti-Muslim columnists, elected to terminate Ann Coulter.

As an update, there was a certain amount of activity last week due to an article by World Net Daily.  Read some of the emails we received here.

Please take the time to send the letter below to the following links.  Please title your emails "Terminate Ann Coulter's Column".

Click here to write to Yahoo Columns.
Write to Conservatism.com.
Email Jewish World Review : schmooze@jewishworldreview.com
Email TownHall.com: info@townhall.com
Email the Conservative Chronicle: conserve@iowaconnect.com
Email World Net Daily: jfarah@worldnetdaily.com, dkupelian@worldnetdaily.com, jkovacs@worldnetdaily.com, dlynne@worldnetdaily.com, amoore@worldnetdaily.com, rstrom@worldnetdaily.com, tambrose@worldnetdaily.com

Write to FrontPage Magazine.  These guys are extremely anti-Muslim and fanatic fascists in their pursuit of conservatism.  It is run by a David Horowitz, who loves Ann because she suggested that we invade Islamic countries and convert them to Christianity.  Little hope of convincing them to drop Ann Coulter, I'm afraid, but we should let them know that she sucks.
 

Dear Sir/Madam;

I would like to express my total dissatisfaction with your organization's syndication of columnist Ann Coulter.  Not only is she one of the worst columnists in recent history, she is also one of the most vindictive and bloodthirsty writers on today's circuit.  Ann Coulter's comments on various talk shows and through her columns portray her to be a vindictive, egocentric, and thoroughly anti-Muslim bigot that has the bad habit of speaking before she thinks.  Some of her more recent comments include:

[about Muslims]  "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war."

"[Clinton] masturbates in the sinks."---Rivera Live 8/2/99

"God gave us the earth. We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, 'Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours.'"---Hannity & Colmes, 6/20/01

To a disabled Vietnam vet: "People like you caused us to lose that war."---MSNBC

"I think we had enough laws about the turn-of-the-century. We don't need any more." Asked how far back would she go to repeal laws, she replied, "Well, before the New Deal...[The Emancipation Proclamation] would be a good start."---Politically Incorrect 5/7/97

It is evident that this "writer" is nothing more than a mouthpiece for ultra-reactionary conservatives, and a blowhard at that.  She does not represent American values; her comments fly in the face of everything that Americans stand for, including the conservative population.  She is disgusting and vindictive, and is unable to generate a single original idea.  Her columns are always about how evil Muslims are, or how all environmentalists should be sentenced to death.  Even conservative organizations like the National Review have dropped her syndication, citing a lack of professional ethics and  integrity. 

I am fairly certain that Ann Coulter does not represent the ideas and values of your company.  In fact, the only people she can claim to represent are bigots.  I therefore ask that you immediately cancel the appearance of her column from your organization.  I also would like to ask that you issue a public statement that informs the media that the reason that Ann Coulter was dropped was because of her paranoid and vindictive bigotry, and that she does not represent the values and the culture of your organization.

Thank you for your time.

Regards,

[pettifogger]

"I think we had enough laws about the turn-of-the-century. We don't need any more." Asked how far back would she go to repeal laws, she replied, "Well, before the New Deal...[The Emancipation Proclamation] would be a good start."---Politically Incorrect 5/7/97

Just gotta correct just one of the many glaring inaccuracies. The New Deal was NOT, repeat NOT, the Emancipation Proclamation. Sheesh.

[VRWCmember]

Have you talked to any fundamentalist Christians lately?

As a fundamentalist Christian, I believe that the Bible is the truth and that every bit of it is the inspired Word of God.

In the OT, God commanded His Chosen people to serve Him only, and on occasion to blot out entire nations of people who worshipped false gods. Those commands were specific, not universal. Now that Christ has been given and we live under a new covenant with God, he has commanded that we love one another, that we take the Gospel of Christ to all nations, and that we be a light and salt in a world of darkness.

I'm anxiously and curiously awaiting your citation of Scriptures that advocate violence against non-Christians, or your previously mentioned advocacy of wife-beating.

[RolandBurnam]

"I think we had enough laws about the turn-of-the-century. We don't need any more." Asked how far back would she go to repeal laws, she replied, "Well, before the New Deal...[The Emancipation Proclamation] would be a good start."---Politically Incorrect 5/7/97

Ok, whatever is in the [] braces is not part of the actual quote, right? So, the liberal editing the quote is saying the "new deal" is actually the emancipation proclamation? OK ... riiiiight...

[netmilsmom]

Sorry. In looking over my notes, the leader lumped the Proverbs 13:24 "He who spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is careful to discipline him."
in with wife problems. I guess this is why we read the Bible ourselves and do not let other's tell us what is in there. I'm so glad that you have the ability to correct what other's may say. It helps one to remain correct in arguments.
Good thing I don't go to BSF anymore.

[E Rocc]

The Quran is what one takes from it. The Bible has some nasty quotes as well. The American Islamists are in the year 2003 and realize that some of these quotes were for their own time (like the Bibles quotes about beating wives). The idiot Islamists, who are living in the 14th century and letting the Imans tell them what the book says, are he ones we have to worry about. I've read it as well and the Old Testament could be used the same way if we were, "A Religion of Peace." The difference is that we don't use our religion to control the masses and live in a free country.

Islam isn't inherently any more evil a religion than Christianity, its just less advanced chronologically. Considering that six hundred years ago (or less) the various aspects of Christianity were constantly warring on other faiths (and indeed on each other), and considering the literal meaning of certain Leviticus and Deuteronomy verses, Jesus's admonition about throwing stones comes to mind.

One thing that's certain is that if we as conservatives or America as a nation declares all of Islam to be our enemy, it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy. I'd just as soon judge individuals as individuals regardless of their faith.

-Eric

[Cannon6]

Thanks for the easy links. I went to all and told them to keep ANN

[netmilsmom]

Thank you Eric, that's what I was trying to say.
Living in the Detroit area, if one is not meeting a Muslim, it is not a day.
And may I put in a plug for my fav restaurant, The Meer in Sterling Heights....
People are people, killers are killers. Not all who are Islamic are killers. Some are in my daughter's kindergarten class.

[VRWCmember]

Thanks. And I'm sorry if I went off on you. I just get really tired of hearing people make claims like "the Bible says you should beat your wife" or "the Bible says to kill this group or that group" or other such nonsense, but then they never back up such claims with a single supporting verse.

[Pharmboy]

Nice job.

[netmilsmom]

Oh no!!! I think you are absolutly right! How can I not sound like an idiot if I quote incorrectly? (here's a hint, I was raised Catholic) I envy those who can pull up direct scripture quotes with book and verse. I'm trying to learn, but I didn't have the years of Sunday school that rewarded for knowing Bible verses!
And again, we must read for ourselves.

[End Times Sentinel]

Thanks for those posts. 

 

netmilsmom, you raised some interesting points and VRWCmember, your clarification on the Fundamentalist interpretation was much appreciated.  It's always a good day when you've learned something!

 

 

 

Owl_Eagle
" WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH"

[E Rocc]

Thank you Eric, that's what I was trying to say.
Living in the Detroit area, if one is not meeting a Muslim, it is not a day.
And may I put in a plug for my fav restaurant, The Meer in Sterling Heights....
People are people, killers are killers. Not all who are Islamic are killers. Some are in my daughter's kindergarten class.

Actually I prefer Fishbones in Greektown. >:)

Seriously, that's precisely it. Most of the convenience stores around here are owned by Arabs...some Christian and some Muslim. They work their butts off to get ahead, take care of their families, and don't tend to go after welfare. I also knew quite a few Muslims in college. Some were good people, some bad. Just like anyone else.

-Eric

[nanomid]

Memetics is a better framework to observe the evolution of religion
Islam is newer than Christianity, but built on the same roots.
Since Christianity is seen as the final fulfillment of the Jewish tradition
Islam had no choice but to be mutually exclusive.

[mhking]

Michael - is it OK if I use the AJNTSA alert? I will cease and desist if you are uncomfortable with it.

No, please do! Actually, I ripped it off from another message board to begin with, and as soon as I can get my personal content area back in one piece, I'm gonna move it there.

[Clara Lou]

I've also read the Koran or Queer'Ann, or whatever you want to call it.
Such airheaded comments only offend the millions of Muslims who are moderate, who do not choose to interpret the Koran as license to kill. [I am not Muslim, BTW.] I just don't see any reason to maim the innocent along with the guilty, to offend all Muslims (including posters here), to vandalize the home of a French woman who's lived in this country for 20 years (Houston), etc. Calling names is infantile.

[netmilsmom]

You're right!
After 9/11 the Arab family up the street proudly displayed their Stars and Stripes before anyone else. They have the prettiest house in the neighborhood and work hard to run a local dollar store. Not all Muslims are bad and not all Christians are good. That crud in Salt Lake who took Elizabeth Smart comes to mind....

[End Times Sentinel]

Such airheaded comments only offend the millions of Muslims who are moderate, who do not choose to interpret the Koran as license to kill.

 

In order to qualify as a "moderate" muslim, you'd have to ignore the central tenants of the religion, and endless invocations to kill infidels. 

 

It's tantamount to calling someone who doesn't attend Mass, take Communion, or take Confession a moderate Catholic.  I'd call them a non-Catholic.

 

When reading the koran or the suras and coming across a phrase like "The Christians say: The Christ is the son of Allah; "Fight against such as those to whom the Scriptures were given [Jews and Christians]...until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued." (Surah 9:29), you've really got to ask yourself, "what kind of person would want to be identified with a religion like this?"

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

[Faithfull]

I agree wit your post #42 and await the answers of netmilsmom as well. I am a former Catholic who also believes the Bible is God's rule book.

[Hila]

Great post! Indeed the truth sets people free, praying and observing that many more Americans are taking the time to study the religion of hatred=islam. The truth we know sets us free from the would-be dominators. There is One who dictates, whose will is done and who has set the boundaries for each country - let all the moon-god worshipers turn back and head to where they originated. This is the land of the brave and the free, a nation under the One True God, American under YAHWEH the Father, the Almighty. And His Son is making intercession on our behalf - islam too shall pass.

[FredZarguna]

Islam isn't inherently any more evil a religion than Christianity,

I would urge you to actually research this position, rather than simply parroting what amounts to the current wisdom that Islam is a "religion of peace." It is not. It is an inherently evil religion, which commands its adherents to subjugate, dismember, and murder other human beings.

Contrarians like to point out that Christians [or Jews, or...] have done bad things too. The difference is that Christians are expressively forbidden to do those things, whereas Muslims are expressly required to do them.Good Christians don't behave this way. "Good" Muslims do.

...its just less advanced chronologically.

This claim is altogether preposterous. Muslims aren't living in a different world from the rest of us, and they seem perfectly capable of grasping the latest innovations in science, technology, economics, or whatever they apply themselves to.

At various times and in various places Muslims have shown themselves to be quite capable of living peacefully with other religions--especially if Islam wasn't the majority faith in a society, or if it served the economic interests of Muslims. So "chronology" quite simply isn't relevant.

and considering the literal meaning of certain Leviticus and Deuteronomy verses, Jesus's admonition about throwing stones comes to mind.

Quite apt, although you probably don't realize why. Whatever the "literal meaning" you're trying to attach to OT verses, all Christians have some version of progressive revelation, or the fulfillment of the covenant in the Person of Christ. There is no progressive revelation in Islam. The most "peaceful" and the most bloody-minded of the Koranic verses are equally binding. In fact, some of the bloodier ones actually take precedence, because Mohammed claimed they abrogated some of his earlier, more tolerant revelations.