Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Third Infantry Finds Chemical Weapons
CBN News ^ | March 26, 2003 | Paul Strand CBN News War Correspondent

Posted on 03/26/2003 12:45:20 PM PST by Freedomsfriend

"What I just heard from a highly placed source here is that they've discovered, they've captured chemical warheads, they're Russian, they have Russian writing all over them and they are chemical warheads."

CBN.com – The Third Infantry Division has captured evidence of chemical weapons as they are fighting Iraq’s Republican Guard just 60 miles south of Baghdad. The evidence has yet to be confirmed, but CBN News War Correspondent Paul Strand delivered this exclusive information by satellite phone early Wednesday. PAT ROBERTSON: We are going to our CBN News War Correspondent Paul Strand, embedded with the Army's Third Infantry Division. That's the spearhead of the attack against Baghdad. Paul, we understand you have some shocking news about chemical warheads. Tell us about it.

PAUL STRAND: Yes, Pat, I do. First of all, I hope you can hear me because I am out in that raging sandstorm and it’s hard to hear you. I hope you hear me okay. What I just heard from a highly placed source here is that they've discovered, they've captured chemical warheads, they're Russian, they have Russian writing all over them and they are chemical warheads. Of course, they can't get into them and find out if there’s chemicals because once they open them they'd all die right there on the spot. But they're gonna ship them off for testing.

They also captured a launcher that was able to shoot these very munitions that they've captured. And they’ve captured a man who mixes the chemicals, that was his job with the Medina Division which is the division we're facing right now near the city of Karbala. So all these things leading the military here to believe we might have been hit by chemical shells any time now, and we're not sure we've got them all. So those are the developments here near Karbala about 60 miles south of Baghdad.

ROBERTSON: Paul, I can hear you loud and clear, so don't worry about that. Let me ask you this, are these the type of weapons of mass destruction that has been talked about so much by President Bush?

STRAND: I’m not sure, Pat. I’ve told you just everything I heard. It happened just a few minutes ago. I would think this is definitely the smoking gun. It’s so strange, because the joke before this war was that Saddam says, "I have no chemical weapons, and if you invade I will use them on you." And now we find out they’re right out there with the frontline troops.

And another disturbing thing I heard a few days ago, was that he has pushed the level of authority for using these weapons down to the commander level. Not up around him, but the very commanders out on the line, they can use these things, they can choose to use them. So that means young officers have the orders now that they can go ahead and use these things if they feel like they are about to be overtaken. So that’s another disturbing development. Not only have we found the warheads, but officers out on the frontline can use them.

ROBERTSON: Paul, are you protected against this kind of thing? Will your suits do it and do you have some kind of an injection that can be used to counteract the effects of VX or whatever?

STRAND: Yes, Pat. We already, from the day we entered Iraq, we have had the suits on, the trousers and the pants, and boots, and gloves, and then we put the masks on. The mask fully protects us and the hood wraps around it tightly. And then we have in our backpacks, we have atropine we can shoot into our legs against nerve agents, we have pills to take against things like anthrax. So we’re pretty well covered. And the soldiers I have talked to seem very comfortable about getting hit with this stuff. The only thing is nobody wants to live in those masks for weeks.

ROBERTSON: Paul, I am told that the sandstorm may be the worst in recent memory, you know, in the last 17 or 18 years. Can you tell us about the sandstorm? Is it growing in intensity?

STRAND: It is about the worst weather I have ever felt in my life. Last night I was sleeping outdoors like usual, and it was so bad I jumped into a Humvee. There, with all of the windows closed and everything, the Humvee just filled with sand, there was so much sand it just came in through the little air holes or whatever. And the wind was so strong, it felt like the Humvee would get picked up and thrown over — and you know, Humvees are big, strong, giant vehicles. Stuff was flying through the air, smashing into the side of the vehicle all night long. And the air is completely yellow. You can't see any normal light, you can’t see the sky. It got dark like an hour before it was supposed to. It’s just truly an amazing sandstorm.

ROBERTSON: The Iraqis are saying it’s the judgment of Allah upon the attackers. Are we finding any bright spots in it for the American troops?

STRAND: We are. The soldiers have so much gear that can operate in this kind of thing that they say actually some obscuring factors like this can help them. Now the thing is, the battle has been raging in Karbala, back and forth, so both sides seem to be still operating in this environment. But I understand if it does go away here in the next day or two, that we will just really smash ahead as hard as we can. You know, I must admit, the first thing I said when the sandstorm came in, a lieutenant and I were sitting in the Humvee with it roaring all around us, and I said, "It’s at a moment like this that a theologian asks, ‘What is God trying to tell us?’"

ROBERTSON: [laughter] Paul, I think a lot of people are going to be asking that. This is kind of a trite statement, but as they say, stay safe.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blixiespixies; cbn; embeddedreport; illegalweapons; michaeldobbs; paulstrand; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-306 next last
To: bluecollarman
I am not trashing them myself. This is an embedded reporter, which establishes credibility in itself.

But, I want confirmation simply because we have been burned too often these past couple days.
101 posted on 03/26/2003 1:09:26 PM PST by rwfromkansas (Soli Deo Gloria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Impossible. If Iraq has chemical weapons, why didn't the UN inspectors find them?

Because the UN inspectors were not allowed to inspect military bases.

102 posted on 03/26/2003 1:09:59 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
"I really have no opinion...."

Now, that's Breaking News!

103 posted on 03/26/2003 1:09:59 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman
bluecollarman:

I agree. CBN is a very credible news organization. I've never found them to report anything but truth. They may focus on things differently, as you might expect, but their usually very accurate.
104 posted on 03/26/2003 1:10:13 PM PST by TruthFactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

Bump
105 posted on 03/26/2003 1:10:42 PM PST by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ez
If the Iraqis have any of that secret Russian stuff, it would explain why Saddam seemed so sure of himself...

It doesn't seem likely that Russia would sell him the front line stuff--at least not as a government level policy--because of the repercussions. However, Russia doesn't seem to exercise full control over what comes out of there, so it could happen. From what I've heard, Putin is regaining some semblance of control, but things had gotten pretty loose while his predecessor hit the bottle.

106 posted on 03/26/2003 1:10:50 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Now, that's Breaking News!

Quick! Post it before he changes his mind! LOL.

107 posted on 03/26/2003 1:11:00 PM PST by concerned about politics (Anti-American protestors are inbread liberal Notsosmartso's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
They didn't go to find, they went to inspect. That which were shown to them did not have chemical weapons.
108 posted on 03/26/2003 1:11:03 PM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
If this is TRUE, the U.N. just became the most irrelavent organization on the face of the Earth.
109 posted on 03/26/2003 1:11:24 PM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: John H K
You get the empty shells, and they're filled JUST prior to use.

The report implies that: "And they’ve captured a man who mixes the chemicals, that was his job with the Medina Division which is the division we're facing right now near the city of Karbala."

This sounds plausible, at least. Could still be a rumor, but if they've actually got (and are interrogating) a chemical guy....

110 posted on 03/26/2003 1:11:30 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
Iraq has declared that it weaponized for chemical weapons purposes the following munitions: RPG-7 rocket-propelled grenades and 82mm and 120mm mortar shells exclusively for CS; 130mm and 155mm artillery shells for mustard agent; 250- and 500-gauge aerial bombs for mustard, tabun, sarin and CS; 122mm rockets, R-400 and DB-2 aerial bombs for sarin and mixtures of GB/GF; and Al Hussein missile warheads for sarin. Of these, Iraq acquired the capability to produce all of the aerial bomb types listed and the Al Hussein missile warheads and chemical containers for 122mm rockets. It was reliant on imports of the other empty munitions but had the capability to empty conventional artillery shells and aerial bombs for subsequent refill with chemical-weapons agent. </>
111 posted on 03/26/2003 1:11:58 PM PST by rumrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: rumrunner
bold off</b>
112 posted on 03/26/2003 1:12:20 PM PST by rumrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Pres Raygun
Any other news media outlet reporting this , YET ?
The SOONER the better.
113 posted on 03/26/2003 1:12:37 PM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Putin is regaining some semblance of control, but things had gotten pretty loose while his predecessor hit the bottle.

It will be intersting to see just how old these shells are.

114 posted on 03/26/2003 1:12:38 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
credible enough to keep me coming back. See the 2000 and 2004 elections and also the 9/11 and afghan threads. right on. NO one else.
115 posted on 03/26/2003 1:12:46 PM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
bump for later
116 posted on 03/26/2003 1:12:46 PM PST by Calpernia (http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman
Why are all you guys trashing CBN?

Because the revelation is obscured by the "Christian" part of it. The best way to bolster the "planted WMD" theories is by the first of these stories being bbroken by the Jerusalem Post and Christian Broadcasting. Think about it.

I am certain WMDs are there, but I'd rather have CNN break the story than this.

117 posted on 03/26/2003 1:13:08 PM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: bluecollarman
Oh something about how he claimed during his presidential run that he'd asked God to change the direction of a hurricane, and God did as requested.
118 posted on 03/26/2003 1:13:12 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Pres Raygun
Am I correct in assuming that you trust Saddam's word more than the word of a fundamentalist Christian or a Zionist Jew?

That's an unfair comparison. Honest people report bogus information all the time, and its more likely to happen if they're sympathies lie more with one side than the other. The CBN reporter may be overenthusiastic, or he's getting info from troops who aren't qualified to make the determination if they are chemicals. Hell, I'm a former artillery officer, and I couldn't tell you just from looking at a soviet round if its chemical or not.

So taking this with a grain of salt doesn't mean that you find Saddam more credible than the reporter. It's simply a recognition that the reporter may have jumped to an unwarranted conclusion.

119 posted on 03/26/2003 1:14:08 PM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2
excuse me, 2000 and 2002 elections.
120 posted on 03/26/2003 1:14:15 PM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson