Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ludicrous double standard further proof of United Nations' anti-U.S. bias
Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | March 29, 2003

Posted on 03/29/2003 10:08:21 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker


Annan: Diplomats should be
"more like Elmo"

'I must say," declared U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Wednesday, "I'm getting increasingly concerned by humanitarian casualties in this conflict. We just had the report that a missile struck a market in Baghdad, and I would want to remind all belligerents that they should respect international humanitarian law and take all necessary steps to protect civilians. Besides, they are responsible for the welfare of the civilian population in the area."

Let's back up for a moment.

According to captured Iraqi soldiers, the Saddam Fedayeen - Saddam's version of Hitlerite brown shirts - have been going door to door in parts of Southern Iraq abducting wives and children and telling husbands and fathers that if they don't fight their families will be executed or tortured or both. The untrained and poorly equipped men are forced into militarily ineffective "wave attacks" against American Bradley fighting vehicles and tanks. They get mowed down.

Dexter Filkins, a New York Times reporter traveling with U.S. forces, writes, "The Iraqi private with a bullet wound in the back of his head suggested something unusually grim. Up and down the 200-mile stretch of desert where the American and British forces have advanced, one Iraqi prisoner after another has told captors a similar tale: that many Iraqi soldiers were fighting at gunpoint, threatened with death by tough loyalists of President Saddam Hussein."

There are persistent reports that Saddam's henchmen are donning British and American uniforms in order to coax disloyal troops into surrendering to what they believe are coalition forces. They are then executed.

When they're not in coalition uniforms, Saddam loyalists are forcing actual civilians to march in front of them because they know American and British forces will go the extra mile to avoid shooting non-combatants.

Iraq's dying Baathist regime has also stationed everything from guns to tanks in, below or beside schools, hospitals, markets and mosques. They conceal weaponry behind cultural treasures, like the ancient ruins of Ctesiphon, and in graveyards hoping that an errant U.S. bomb can be spun into an American "war on Islam" or on Arabs.

In short, they defy every rule of war designed to protect the lives of innocents because they know the only thing that can slow the progress to victory are our own high standards and our collective conscience.

This shouldn't surprise anyone, because Saddam wages war exactly as he waged "peace." In defiance of international law and human decency, Saddam built palaces and bought weapons with money from the United Nations oil-for-food program while his people starved. Why shouldn't he use them as cannon fodder now?

And I bring this up to highlight the astounding chutzpah of Kofi Annan and the rest of the Al-Jazeera-watching world. Annan's comments were intended - and received - as a rebuke of the United States. After all, Annan had said exactly zero when the Iraqis used human shields in Nasiriya or when hard evidence emerged of Saddam using a hospital as a military base.

Annan has given no encouragement of any kind as the United States has risked American lives in order to spare Iraqi civilians. He's offered no acknowledgement that our precision bombs cost Americans billions of dollars in order to save thousands of non-American lives. He's only exhorted that "both sides" (wink, wink) follow "international law" after one mistake that killed slightly more than a dozen Iraqi civilians at an open air market in Baghdad.

What we are witnessing now is barely even a double standard since it's not clear Saddam is being held to any standard at all, while America's armed forces are being held to a higher standard than any - any - in human memory.

Fortunately for the Iraqis, we don't need the United Nations to serve as our conscience. And if the finger-wagging continues, we may decide we don't need the United Nations for anything at all.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ineffectiveun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Tom Jefferson; backhoe; Militiaman7; BARLF; timestax; imintrouble; cake_crumb; Brad's Gramma; ...
No more UN for US-list

If people want on or off this list, please let me know.

21 posted on 03/30/2003 6:46:58 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
bttt
22 posted on 03/30/2003 7:10:04 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; ATOMIC_PUNK; Libertarianize the GOP; Carry_Okie; 2sheep; 4Freedom; Alamo-Girl; ...
Koffi ping
23 posted on 03/30/2003 10:07:00 AM PST by madfly (AZFIRE.org, NATURALPROCESS.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
To Kofi Annan with love,

Bart


24 posted on 03/30/2003 10:53:02 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Salman
Stephan Notley's a sweetheart, but as a cartoonist he's a progressive Ted Rall wannabe.
25 posted on 03/30/2003 11:04:38 AM PST by Sally II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks, I think the UN should be reduced in scope or shut down!
26 posted on 03/30/2003 11:09:35 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Saddam's days are numbered!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast
"Pompous ass."

and Prince of Pucker

27 posted on 03/30/2003 11:36:31 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: madfly

28 posted on 03/30/2003 2:04:42 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Where WAS the UN on the Iraqi slaghter of civilians?

Making money -- lots of money.

"Since the program began operating, in December 1996, the U.N. has shepherded about $64 billion in Iraqi oil sales, and more than $39 billion in relief purchases, plus billions more for projects such as compensation to foreign victims of the first Gulf War. To cover its administrative costs, the U.N. collects a 2.2 percent commission on Iraqi oil sales, a setup that over the course of the program has generated more than $1 billion for U.N. coffers."

Oil for Food, Money for Kofi

Kofi 'Annandersen' - Enron-style accounting at the U.N. Oil-for-Food Program

29 posted on 03/30/2003 2:11:33 PM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Whe the h3ll was protecting innocents before the US went to Iraq. Not the UN. This is all about money for the UN. If Iraq turns into a country and not a H&ll hole they won't be getting any oil for food proceeds. I'm sure the administration costs were running about 60%.
30 posted on 03/30/2003 2:21:52 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Now, let's do the math!

Saddam 23 years; 1,000,000 victims died under his regime:
8,400 days = 120 victims per day!

Hell, we're only being blamed for a few of those per day!

LET'S ROLL, we've got to keep up the numbers!!!
31 posted on 03/30/2003 2:36:26 PM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

32 posted on 03/30/2003 3:35:43 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Famous Anus" must have run out of towels to give out in the UN's men's room.
33 posted on 03/30/2003 4:59:40 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Even more so since it has been proven that the Iraqi market missile was an Iraqi air defense surface-to-air missile that fell back on its own people.
34 posted on 03/30/2003 5:03:42 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Which of the two people in the article's lead photo is Kofi Annan? I'm guessing it's the red guy with the yellow nose.
35 posted on 03/30/2003 5:59:32 PM PST by hauerf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Kofi Annan, you're not only a disgrace to Ghana and the United Nations, you are a wart on the spincter of humanity.
You say wart, I say boil. Either way...a pain in the a**.
!NUTS
36 posted on 03/30/2003 6:13:45 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Boil works for me. :)
37 posted on 03/30/2003 7:55:23 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: madfly
REUTERS FEEDROOM VIDEOS
38 posted on 03/30/2003 8:51:16 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK ("He is a moss-gatherer, and I have been a stone doomed to rolling." Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
And where is the UN on the genocide in Zimbabwe, etc. etc.
39 posted on 03/31/2003 8:59:31 AM PST by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Not to mention, where was the UN on September 11? The UN is now officially gone to the dogs...
40 posted on 04/03/2003 3:40:28 PM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson