Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Chemical Weapons Believed Found After Coalition Cluster-bombing
Fox News - TV

Posted on 04/01/2003 4:21:23 PM PST by mrobison

Fox News just reported that samples of suspected chemical weapons have been sent to the U. S. for analysis after coalition forces cluster-bombed an Iraqi position, then sent the Special Forces in to mop up.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: illegalweapons; iraqifreedom; smokinggum; smokinggun; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: steveegg
Thanks. Islamist SOBs!
21 posted on 04/01/2003 4:55:18 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Hans Blix: "But what is the problem? Chemical weapons don't kill people. People kill people."
22 posted on 04/01/2003 4:55:40 PM PST by Maeve (Siobhan's daughter and sometime banshee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveegg; EaglesUpForever
Of course Blix will say that they weren't intended to kill people, thus weren't weapons, unless he sees a sufficient number of American dead.
...
And the Frogs will say that we planted them.

And the peaceniks will say our cluster bombs are the real WMDs...

23 posted on 04/01/2003 5:04:03 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stilts
I've heard somewhere like 70% of our bombs are guided, precision.
24 posted on 04/01/2003 5:04:13 PM PST by TheDon ( It is as difficult to provoke the United States as it is to survive its eventual and tardy response)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Is this the story you heard? http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-12278349,00.html

Or were cluster bombs launched?
25 posted on 04/01/2003 5:07:39 PM PST by Calpernia (http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
There's a Christian Science Monitor article, titled "New find in 'smoking gun' search, that mentions similar info, based on a joint press conference in Halabja. It's posted here
26 posted on 04/01/2003 5:09:32 PM PST by Steve Schulin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stilts
We use cluster bombs. Napalm is no longer used.
27 posted on 04/01/2003 5:14:39 PM PST by Iwentsouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
Fox News actually had an interview where the actual soldiers who seized the materials made the statement. That's as "first hand" as you will get. Forget the wire services -- they are too busy trying to second guess Rumsfeld to do any serious reporting!
28 posted on 04/01/2003 5:17:54 PM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iwentsouth
Wrong. The US has used napalm in GWI and in Afghanistan.
29 posted on 04/01/2003 5:18:08 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (http://www.angelfire.com/ultra/terroristcorecard/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: stilts
We're trying as hard as we can to deplete our current supply. I understand that we have been able to "dispose" of quite a large number of them recently.
30 posted on 04/01/2003 5:19:11 PM PST by 3k9pm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: stilts
Try this site

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/cluster.htm

31 posted on 04/01/2003 5:23:11 PM PST by HP8753 (Tagline Testing....1,2,3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Pentagon denies report on napalm
March 24 2003





The Pentagon has a denied a report in The Age on Saturday that napalm was used in an attack by US Navy planes on an Iraqi position at Safwan Hill in southern Iraq.

A navy official in Washington, Lieutenant-Commander Danny Hernandez, said: "We don't even have that in our arsenal." The US military says it last used napalm in 1993 and destroyed its last batch of the weapon in 2001.

The report was filed by Age correspondent Lindsay Murdoch, who is attached to units of the First US Marine Division.

Murdoch's report was based on information from two marine officers, who said napalm was used in the air strike on the hill. One of the officers repeated that napalm was used when Murdoch was asked by The Age foreign editor to confirm the story on Friday.
32 posted on 04/01/2003 5:23:40 PM PST by Iwentsouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Iwentsouth
A navy official in Washington, Lieutenant-Commander Danny Hernandez, said: "We don't even have that in our arsenal." The US military says it last used napalm in 1993 and destroyed its last batch of the weapon in 2001.

Any idea why?

33 posted on 04/01/2003 5:25:42 PM PST by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
This is correct. An official spokesman for the Armed Services was interviewed on-camera.
34 posted on 04/01/2003 5:27:43 PM PST by mrobison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pttttt
PC nicey nicey crap.

You want shock and awe.

Nothing induces capitulation faster than cooking a good portion of an op4 with napalm. Takes the fight out of troops pretty quick.
35 posted on 04/01/2003 5:29:32 PM PST by 3k9pm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pttttt
Bad press...
36 posted on 04/01/2003 5:31:33 PM PST by Iwentsouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Believe me: Geraldo would love nothing better than to find something like this and show it to the world.

In part of course because he is a hot-dog--a characteristic he shares with those like Mike Wallace, Bill O'Reilly and many other news "personalities."

In part, though, it is because the large number of friends he lost on 9/11 changed him forever.
37 posted on 04/01/2003 5:32:32 PM PST by Illbay (Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pttttt
They have better more precise weapons to do the same job.

The fuel air bomb for example takes care of an area weapon to burn but causes much less after affects, also the daisy cutter produces the same brush clearing (defoliation) without the continued burn. I might also suggest that napalm makes for real lousy press. Pictures of live burning people don't make good pictures for the home front.

38 posted on 04/01/2003 5:42:48 PM PST by tricky_k_1972
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Thanks for the ping! Looking forward to seeing the results!
39 posted on 04/01/2003 5:45:38 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
I heard it on the radio but I haven't seen anything on the net yet. I'll see if I can find something.
40 posted on 04/01/2003 6:05:00 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson