Skip to comments.
Iraqi Chemical Weapons Believed Found After Coalition Cluster-bombing
Fox News - TV
Posted on 04/01/2003 4:21:23 PM PST by mrobison
Fox News just reported that samples of suspected chemical weapons have been sent to the U. S. for analysis after coalition forces cluster-bombed an Iraqi position, then sent the Special Forces in to mop up.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: illegalweapons; iraqifreedom; smokinggum; smokinggun; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: steveegg
Thanks. Islamist SOBs!
21
posted on
04/01/2003 4:55:18 PM PST
by
blam
To: mrobison
Hans Blix: "But what is the problem? Chemical weapons don't kill people. People kill people."
22
posted on
04/01/2003 4:55:40 PM PST
by
Maeve
(Siobhan's daughter and sometime banshee.)
To: steveegg; EaglesUpForever
Of course Blix will say that they weren't intended to kill people, thus weren't weapons, unless he sees a sufficient number of American dead.
...
And the Frogs will say that we planted them.And the peaceniks will say our cluster bombs are the real WMDs...
23
posted on
04/01/2003 5:04:03 PM PST
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: stilts
I've heard somewhere like 70% of our bombs are guided, precision.
24
posted on
04/01/2003 5:04:13 PM PST
by
TheDon
( It is as difficult to provoke the United States as it is to survive its eventual and tardy response)
To: mrobison
25
posted on
04/01/2003 5:07:39 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: mrobison
There's a Christian Science Monitor article, titled "New find in 'smoking gun' search, that mentions similar info, based on a joint press conference in Halabja. It's posted
here
To: stilts
We use cluster bombs. Napalm is no longer used.
To: mrobison
Fox News actually had an interview where the actual soldiers who seized the materials made the statement. That's as "first hand" as you will get. Forget the wire services -- they are too busy trying to second guess Rumsfeld to do any serious reporting!
To: Iwentsouth
Wrong. The US has used napalm in GWI and in Afghanistan.
29
posted on
04/01/2003 5:18:08 PM PST
by
Straight Vermonter
(http://www.angelfire.com/ultra/terroristcorecard/index.html)
To: stilts
We're trying as hard as we can to deplete our current supply. I understand that we have been able to "dispose" of quite a large number of them recently.
30
posted on
04/01/2003 5:19:11 PM PST
by
3k9pm
To: stilts
Try this site
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/cluster.htm
31
posted on
04/01/2003 5:23:11 PM PST
by
HP8753
(Tagline Testing....1,2,3)
To: Straight Vermonter
Pentagon denies report on napalm
March 24 2003
The Pentagon has a denied a report in The Age on Saturday that napalm was used in an attack by US Navy planes on an Iraqi position at Safwan Hill in southern Iraq.
A navy official in Washington, Lieutenant-Commander Danny Hernandez, said: "We don't even have that in our arsenal." The US military says it last used napalm in 1993 and destroyed its last batch of the weapon in 2001.
The report was filed by Age correspondent Lindsay Murdoch, who is attached to units of the First US Marine Division.
Murdoch's report was based on information from two marine officers, who said napalm was used in the air strike on the hill. One of the officers repeated that napalm was used when Murdoch was asked by The Age foreign editor to confirm the story on Friday.
To: Iwentsouth
A navy official in Washington, Lieutenant-Commander Danny Hernandez, said: "We don't even have that in our arsenal." The US military says it last used napalm in 1993 and destroyed its last batch of the weapon in 2001. Any idea why?
33
posted on
04/01/2003 5:25:42 PM PST
by
pttttt
To: TommyDale
This is correct. An official spokesman for the Armed Services was interviewed on-camera.
34
posted on
04/01/2003 5:27:43 PM PST
by
mrobison
To: pttttt
PC nicey nicey crap.
You want shock and awe.
Nothing induces capitulation faster than cooking a good portion of an op4 with napalm. Takes the fight out of troops pretty quick.
35
posted on
04/01/2003 5:29:32 PM PST
by
3k9pm
To: pttttt
Bad press...
To: ewing
Believe me: Geraldo would love nothing better than to find something like this and show it to the world.
In part of course because he is a hot-dog--a characteristic he shares with those like Mike Wallace, Bill O'Reilly and many other news "personalities."
In part, though, it is because the large number of friends he lost on 9/11 changed him forever.
37
posted on
04/01/2003 5:32:32 PM PST
by
Illbay
(Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
To: pttttt
They have better more precise weapons to do the same job.
The fuel air bomb for example takes care of an area weapon to burn but causes much less after affects, also the daisy cutter produces the same brush clearing (defoliation) without the continued burn. I might also suggest that napalm makes for real lousy press. Pictures of live burning people don't make good pictures for the home front.
To: Calpernia
Thanks for the ping! Looking forward to seeing the results!
39
posted on
04/01/2003 5:45:38 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
To: mrobison
I heard it on the radio but I haven't seen anything on the net yet. I'll see if I can find something.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson