Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pravda: Rumsfeld Compares Lenin to Hitler
Pravda ^ | 2003-04-10 | Timothy BANCROFT-HINCHEY

Posted on 04/10/2003 10:21:30 AM PDT by WaveThatFlag

Donald Rumsfeld today proclaimed that Saddam Hussein will join others in the annals of the history books as a failed dictator, naming "Hitler, Stalin, Lenin and Ceausescu".

For Donald Rumsfeld's information, Vladimir Ulyanov came to power on a message of "bread and peace", setting in motion a process which was to bring a Medieval state to the front line of development and give to an oppressed, illiterate population with a near to zero chance of social mobility every opportunity for a good education, a guaranteed job, house, retirement pension, food, vodka, health care and cultural and sports opportunities second to none.

Vladimir Ulyanov set in motion a process which sees the Russian people today as well or better prepared than their peers abroad to perform any job anywhere on earth.

Vladimir Ulyanov set in motion the mechanism to create the Soviet Union, which heroically defeated the fascist forces of Hitler, who Rumsfeld mentions in the same breath as Lenin, which lost 20,000,000 of its souls and whose armed forces, under Stalin, who Rumsfeld also mentions in the same breath, killed 90% of all German soldiers in the war.

That everything was not perfect in Vladimir Ulyanov's Russia is patently clear. However, to compare him to Hitler is wholly inappropriate and demonstrates a degree of arrogance and ignorance shocking in a person at the political level which Rumsfeld has somehow attained.

At least Vladimir Ulyanov did not flout international law and launch a murderous campaign against a sovereign nation, massacring civilians, leaving women and children without limbs. Maybe Rumsfeld forgot to add Bush to the list. For Rumsfeld's information, Lenin was Vladimir Ulyanov's pseudonym.

If Rumsfeld compares Lenin to Hitler, maybe we should compare Bush to Genghis Khan and Rumsfeld himself to Jabba the Hutt.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: BlueLancer
And took it away again as soon as the situation improved ... with the associated massacre of those who participated and were successful in it.

I am not sure about the massacres, but I know he took it away. The capitalist measures were pretty well known as temporary (perhaps not by those practicing it). Castro does the same thing today. All I am saying is that Lenin was a piker compared to Stalin. Supposedly, on his deathbed, Stalins's comrades were so afraid of him that they let him die rather than allow him to recieve treatment.

21 posted on 04/10/2003 10:39:36 AM PDT by Hacksaw (Dangerous Jesus Lover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
So they're trying to draw distinctions as to which tyrant was worse than others?
Okay, Lenin certainly deserves placement somewhere in the top ten, but I'll agree that he has a lower ranking than either Hitler or Stalin.
Ceausescu? Yeah, he was a tyrant, too. But I'm kinda surprised he made the list ahead of Mussolini, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, etc. etc.

I don't know what good it is to debate which was worse since they were all extremely evil bumwipes.

Hey, howcome Klinton didn't make the list?

22 posted on 04/10/2003 10:40:46 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
The Black Book of Communism estimates that in the first two months of the Red Terror in the Fall of 1918 alone, the Bolsheviks executed between 10000 and 15000 people, more than the total number executed by all the Tsars between 1825 and 1917. The massacres of peasnats in the civil war from 1919 to 1920, in the revolts of 1920 and 1921, the deaths in the Great Famine of 1921-22; all of these can be attributed to Lenin. While Lenin was put out of action by a stroke in 1923, at that stage he was well ahead of Hilter's pace for his first six years; and of course he laid the groundwork for Stalin.

Rummy had it right, as usual.

23 posted on 04/10/2003 10:45:31 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
I think Baghdad Bob has escaped and is writing under a pen name.
24 posted on 04/10/2003 10:46:19 AM PDT by Mister Magoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
T B-H is an irrelevant joke.
25 posted on 04/10/2003 10:46:19 AM PDT by Maedhros (Nelyafinwë)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
The only truth in this article is the opening paragraph.

Russia is still a Medieval state, the people are still greatly oppressed by the weight of decades of communism and illiteracy, the lives were marked with economic oppression, the bread was produced from imported American grain, the jobs were based upon a corupt system of inept, pass the buck cronism, and now the only pension they have left is the legacy of failure.

Plus we have witnessed thier advanced military equipment fail and they export zero technology to the west.

Oh why continue, these people long for the uptopian, though less than perfect, good ol' days...

26 posted on 04/10/2003 10:56:57 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
What a kook this author is. Lenin and Saddam were men of peace who improved the lot of the citizenry, Bush and Rumsfeld are in league with the devil.

Plus, he's an absolutely stellar armchair general. Check out his predictions from a week ago:

The initial “blitzkrieg” announced by Washington won a lot of ground and gained a lot of sand. With 100% air supremacy, this was not a surprise. However, if seven days were necessary to secure the port of Um Qas-r, which lies on the border with Kuwait, the notion remains that if this illegal campaign is to take Baghdad, defended by five divisions of Republican Guards who have sworn to fight to the death, this act of butchery will last a lot longer than the Pentagon had imagined.

Quite how long, not even Donald Rumsfeld knows. Here is a Secretary of Defence who likes to make decisions from a comfortable armchair, who likes to see Iraqi soldiers killed, who sends his own troops to their deaths, in the name of the energy lobby, and here is a man who shows a callous disregard for human life. Rumsfeld, along with Bush, appear more like the cohorts of the Devil than men of God, which they claim to be.

27 posted on 04/10/2003 10:59:39 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
You know Henry Waxman looks like Lenin and Lenin right now looks like Wax
28 posted on 04/10/2003 11:03:51 AM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
What's wrong with comparing Lenin to Hitler?

There's no comparing Lenin and Hitler. Lenin was ultimately responsible for many more deaths than Hitler.

29 posted on 04/10/2003 11:05:31 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Some people seem to be confusing Vladimir Ilyich (Ulyanov) as being Stalin, rather than Lenin. Not that there is a whole lot of difference between the two. I feel certain that Lenin participated in The Great Terror, until his death in the mid 20's.
30 posted on 04/10/2003 11:07:15 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const vector<tag>& theTags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peeve23
We might mention that Stalin was Hitler's henchman until Hitler got greedy. They were in the same bed. Two socialists; two animals.

In fact, Hitler hoped to install Stalin as a puppet leader over the vanquished Russians had the Germans won the war, that's how impressed Hitler was with Stalin's brutality.

31 posted on 04/10/2003 11:07:33 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Ummm, so what, Pravda?

Lenin and Hitler had a lot in common. So did Lenin's successor Stalin. As a matter of fact, Stalin probably massacred more human beings than Hitler did - and that says a lot.
32 posted on 04/10/2003 11:08:17 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
What's wrong with comparing Lenin to Hitler?>>

Hitler murdered fewer people.
33 posted on 04/10/2003 11:08:17 AM PDT by homeagain balkansvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
To quote one of my favorite movies "The Boondock Saints"

"They're all bad guys, now they're all dead bad guys."
34 posted on 04/10/2003 11:08:40 AM PDT by Eagle Eye JR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye JR
Or Arnold in True Lies, "But they were all bad."
35 posted on 04/10/2003 11:09:41 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
For Donald Rumsfeld's information, Vladimir Ulyanov came to power on a message of "bread and peace",

For Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey's information, Adolph Hitler came to power on a message of "freedom and bread".

That's not the only similarity.

36 posted on 04/10/2003 11:10:35 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Vladimir Ulyanov came to power on a message of "bread and peace",

Lenin's message, more accurately described, was "take and break."

37 posted on 04/10/2003 11:15:34 AM PDT by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
Of which 19 million were killed directly by Stalin himself. Stupid commies are still with us -- here and there.

Actually it is alot worse than that. Stalin killed more along the lines of 40-60 million of his own people.

Funny that we should choose Stalin as our hero because he was betrayed by Hitler in a war which they both started.

38 posted on 04/10/2003 11:19:43 AM PDT by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Yeh - I'm reading The Black Book of Communism now - you're referring to chapters 3 and 4, a depressing litany of just how ugly the place got long before Stalin took over.

Comrades! The kulak uprising in your five districts must be crushed without pity. The interests of the whole revolution demand such actions, for the final struggle with the kulaks has now begun. You must make an example of these people. (1) Hang (I mean hang publicly, so that people see it) at least 100 kulaks, rich bastards, and known blood-suckers, (2) Publish their names, (3) Seize all their grain. (4) Single out the hostages per my istructions in yesterday's telegram. Do all this so that for miles around people see it all, understand it, tremble, and tell themselves that we are killing the bloodthirsty kulaks and that we will continue to do so. Reply saying you have received and carried out these instructions. Lenin. P.S. Find tougher people.

That was 10 August, 1918. Nice fellow.

39 posted on 04/10/2003 11:25:11 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
ONe of Lenin's first ordes was to kill all the farmers and take their land. When it went slow he asked, "Why are not more people hanging from trees." That is the legacy of Lenin. The next legacy was the murder of tens of thousands of Doctors, teachers and business people. That is why Lenin is just like Hitler. By the way after 1990, did the stautes of Lenin remain standing?
40 posted on 04/10/2003 11:25:39 AM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson