Skip to comments.
'It is gasp-making to think that a Labour MP could be accused of such a thing.' (Galloway Alert)
The Scotsman ^
| Wed 23 Apr 2003
| TRACEY LAWSON
Posted on 04/22/2003 7:25:00 PM PDT by Happygal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
No smoke without fire? No $h1t! ;-)
Mr. Galloway may think he can run as an 'independent'...but methinks his constituency will be a minority of ONE.
1
posted on
04/22/2003 7:25:01 PM PDT
by
Happygal
To: MadIvan; sauropod; dighton; general_re
Ping.
BTW..me thinks Mr. Galloway got the Scots upset, and that hasn't happened since the last distillery ran dry! *LOL* (kiddin') ;-)
Please ping people who may find this interesting btw! *S*
2
posted on
04/22/2003 7:26:35 PM PDT
by
Happygal
To: Happygal
3
posted on
04/22/2003 7:31:26 PM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
To: Happygal
""What is the motivation behind George Galloways visits to the Middle East, anyway?"
Let me see if I can explain it to ye, laddie,
£££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££,
Now do ye ken?
To: backhoe; aculeus
5
posted on
04/22/2003 7:35:11 PM PDT
by
dighton
(Amen-Corner Hatchet Team, Nasty Little Cliqueâ„¢)
To: Grampa Dave; mewzilla; MadIvan; GailA; alnitak; marron; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog; Dog Gone; ...
Yet more Galloway.
6
posted on
04/22/2003 7:46:18 PM PDT
by
Shermy
(Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
To: Happygal
"Socialism? I havent used that word for years." No, the socialists avoid that term like the plague. They know it is a totally discredited political belief, so they hide under various other names like 'liberal' (in the US) and New Labor or New Democrat.
7
posted on
04/22/2003 7:46:24 PM PDT
by
expatpat
To: expatpat
Perhaps the chickens have come home to roost.
8
posted on
04/22/2003 7:49:38 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Shermy
He is getting attention!
9
posted on
04/22/2003 7:52:38 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
To: Happygal
IF THE only thing worse than being talked about is not to be talked about at all, George Galloway might, in Oscar Wildes opinion, have had something to smile about yesterday. To continue the theme, Galloway has started libel proceedings against the Telegraph, a decision which may rank with Wilde's suing the Marquis of Queensbury for slander.
Wilde lost, even though Queensbury conceded that he knew the original slander, that Wilde was pretending to be homosexual, was false when he wrote it.
10
posted on
04/22/2003 7:59:23 PM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
("From now on, every Christmas, we will remember a brave man called Jesus")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
He is getting attention! Of course he's getting attention. This article is in 'The Scotsman'. Ye think the home boys would ignore it?
11
posted on
04/22/2003 8:02:00 PM PDT
by
Happygal
To: Oztrich Boy
Wilde was 'pretending' to be a homosexual? He should have won that case. He was a homosexual, no pretense about it! *LOL*
12
posted on
04/22/2003 8:03:01 PM PDT
by
Happygal
To: expatpat
Or "Progressive."
13
posted on
04/22/2003 8:04:29 PM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
To: MEG33
I hope so. I once saw that beast on the BBC screaming about "the bible belt far right-wing Republican selected president" leading the world into World War 3. He was frothing at the mouth, I kid ye not!
To: Happygal
Queensbury left a note for "Oscar Wilde, posing as a somdomite" (sic). Which technically isn't a slander.
Wilde chose to prosecute the implied accusation of homosexuality, on the basis that he wasn't one. Queensbury defended on the basis of "oh yes he was".
No way Wilde was going to win that contest.
15
posted on
04/22/2003 8:13:15 PM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
("From now on, every Christmas, we will remember a brave man called Jesus")
To: Oztrich Boy
Never mind. Oscar Wilde was a damned good poet.
16
posted on
04/22/2003 8:24:15 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Hazzardgate
We have plenty of those statements from this side of the Pond!
17
posted on
04/22/2003 8:51:27 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Happygal
Happygal, thanks for a great article! HAH, I can't wait for this guy to go down...is everyone buzzing about it?
18
posted on
04/22/2003 9:14:37 PM PDT
by
ellery
To: Oztrich Boy
No way Wilde was going to win that contest. No shit! *LOL*...Doesn't take away from the fact that Wilde was probably one of the greatest wits of the 19th century.
19
posted on
04/22/2003 9:33:22 PM PDT
by
Happygal
To: Shermy
Just follow the Opecker Islamofacist's money to see why politicians love them, non profits like the enviral whackos love them, why the so called peace groups like Answer love them and even left wing mediots who control the fishwraps and tv nets love them.
20
posted on
04/22/2003 11:18:56 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson