Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolff's misleading Limbaugh story (New York Mag CENTCOM Jerk is LYING)
Spinsanity ^ | April 22, 2003 | Brendan Nyhan

Posted on 04/25/2003 3:25:51 PM PDT by Timesink

Wolff's misleading Limbaugh story (4/22)

By Brendan Nyhan

[Donation drive: After two years of hard work to widespread media acclaim, we're asking for your support for one week -- please help make what we do possible! Amazon and Paypal links are available on the right sidebar for donations. Thanks!]

Since he asked a critical question at a CENTCOM briefing on March 27, Michael Wolff has been peddling a tale of woe. In numerous articles and media appearances, the New York Magazine media critic has blamed a flood of hate mail on Rush Limbaugh, who Wolff claims denounced his question, accused him of racism and gave out his email address on the air. But Wolff is severely distorting what happened, as Limbaugh has repeatedly pointed out.

As the Associated Press reported that day, Wolff generated applause from reporters for asking Brigadier General Vincent Brooks, "I mean no disrespect by this question, but I want to ask about the value proposition of these briefings. We're no longer being briefed by senior-most officers." Limbaugh criticized Wolff on the air on the same day (Windows Media Player audio), stating that if a conservative reporter had asked the same question of Brooks, who is black, the reporter would have been accused of racism.

In an article in The Nation, Michael Massing claimed Limbaugh "gave out Wolff's e-mail address and urged listeners to vent their displeasure. More than 3,000 messages poured into Wolff's inbox, accusing him of being unpatriotic, antimilitary and worse." This account, which apparently came from Wolff, was picked up in an April 10 article in the Austin American Statesman, which stated that Limbaugh "incited an e-mail campaign against" Wolff.

On April 11, Wolff claimed Limbaugh "gave out my email address" on C-SPAN's "Washington Journal" (Real Player video). Then, in a New York Magazine article about his experience, Wolff expanded on his account, claiming that, "according to Rush, that great defender of the rights of African-Americans, I was a racist" and that "Rush gave out my e-mail address," prompting "3,000 e-mails, full of righteous fury." (This was later repeated in a reprint of the article in The Guardian, a British newspaper.)

Throughout, Limbaugh has questioned Wolff's account, beginning on April 8 and continuing on April 11 and April 14. Each time, Limbaugh has correctly pointed out that he never gave out Wolff's e-mail address. Wolf has continued to repeat his story, however, and to date, no corrections have been published that I can locate.

When asked by email about this discrepancy, Wolff replied, "my URL [the address of his website] appeared on his [Limbaugh's] website." When asked where the URL appeared since it is not currently posted on the original page about Wolff, "Hmmm...don't know. Not looking at it now. But I did see it--it was my burnrate.[com] address. And hundreds and hundreds of the emails referenced it." He later elaborated: "www.burnrate[.com, his website] goes to me but we took it down because [the] server got overwhelmed; it also identified my direct email."

However, even if Limbaugh did link to Wolff's website, that does not mean Limbaugh gave out Wolff's email address on the air and told people to email him, as Wolff has clearly implied multiple times. Links, even in a negative context, are not tantamount to inciting an email campaign. Limbaugh has an audience of twenty million listeners; in an audience of that size, many people will send emails to those discussed on the air even if the host does not tell them to do so. As Limbaugh has pointed out, if he actually told people to email Wolff or anyone else (which he specifically does not do), the deluge would most likely overwhelm them with tens of thousands of emails. Moreover, as Limbaugh correctly contends, he never accused Wolff of racism, but instead alleged a double standard in criticism of high-ranking black officials.

In short, Wolff's account is highly misleading at best; he should stop repeating it. For a journalist to be peddling such a tall tale is an embarrassment.

[Email this to a friend] [Subscribe to our email list]

4/22/2003 10:06:41 AM EST |


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mediabias; michaelwolff; rush; rushbashing; rushlimbaugh; spinsanity

Letter: Limbaugh's webmaster responds (4/22)

Dear Brendan,

I just read your piece on Michael Wolff and wanted to let you know that contrary to what Mr. Wolff says, we never posted his e-mail address or his website URL on RushLimbaugh.com. We did not link to any of his articles on that day when Rush covered the CENTCOM briefing sound bite.

His e-mail address is listed at the bottom of his columns. If people found it, that's where they found it on their own, not with any encouragement from Rush or his website, nor via any link from the site.

Sincerely,

George Prayias
Webmaster, RushLimbaugh.com

1 posted on 04/25/2003 3:25:51 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timesink
HEY WOLFIE YOU GOOF-BALL

First off, You go out to a briefing and then you make
insulting remarks to a general because your bloated ego will only let you listen to to the top man.
Hey PAL, if you can go clean toilets somewhere for all i care.
2 posted on 04/25/2003 3:48:09 PM PDT by Cheapskate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheapskate
Surely it took years of hard work and discipline for General Brooks to get where he is. Wolf on the other hand is a moron, and who really cares what he thinks. in my opinion Rush should give out this guy's e mail address so he can find out then just how many people would e mail.
3 posted on 04/25/2003 4:01:20 PM PDT by priceofreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cheapskate
I heard his question during the news conference. My immediate thought was "What a self-absorbed whiner!" I thought General Brooks handled it very well, but Wolff's question was so whiney and me-oriented that it disgusted me as soon as I heard it.

It was like the journalists were the important ones and the soldiers who were really sacrificing and putting their lives on the line didn't matter much. Maybe it was at this news conf where General Brooks had to explain that General Franks couldn't be there because he was fighting a war.

Any criticism Wolff gets he brought on himself.
4 posted on 04/25/2003 4:19:13 PM PDT by Iowa_Clone (repatriated McGovern worker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iowa_Clone
wolf is cnn's Z block.
5 posted on 04/25/2003 4:54:32 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ( Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: priceofreedom
Surely it took years of hard work and discipline for General Brooks to get where he is.

General Brooks father was a Major General. His brother is also a Briagadier General and Commandant of Cadets at West Point.

6 posted on 04/25/2003 5:03:55 PM PDT by opbuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Is Brendan Nyhan any relation to that fat Boston Globe liberal blow-hard David Nyhan?
7 posted on 04/25/2003 6:13:35 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
From Wolff's question:

"Why should we stay?"

Well then go home, jackass.
8 posted on 04/25/2003 6:20:14 PM PDT by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: opbuzz
Now that sounds like some Affirmative affirmative action. Are you implying that Brooks doesn't earn his pay?
9 posted on 04/25/2003 6:55:31 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Fetch !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cheapskate
Maybe the highest ranking generals were not there because the highest ranking reporters were not there. Hume, Brokaw, Rather.
10 posted on 04/25/2003 10:33:55 PM PDT by 11x62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
No. I'm implying that many folks like to comment on matters that they haven't an inkling on. Wolff's comments included. I've only added a tidbit that others may not have been familiar wth.

I can't recall another family with three flag officers.

11 posted on 04/26/2003 6:44:15 AM PDT by opbuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: opbuzz
You are so right. And can you imagine taking stuff from those goofs every day like he did? He got my respect for that alone before I knew his family history.
12 posted on 04/26/2003 7:55:16 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Fetch !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Rush Limbaugh is savvy enough to know that anyone who wants to be someone tries to jumpstart their rise to fame on the shoulders of a giant, talk radio's TOP GUN, the conservative nation's hero, Rush Limbaugh!<p.
That's the facts!
13 posted on 04/26/2003 8:05:02 AM PDT by harpo11 (Godspeed Brave USA Troops! My Families Thoughts and Prayers are Being Sent to YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink

.............

That's one weird-lookin' dude.

14 posted on 04/26/2003 8:05:07 AM PDT by dighton (Amen-Corner Hatchet Team, Nasty Little Cliqueâ„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
The last time I saw lips like those, a baby lamb was coming out of them.
15 posted on 04/26/2003 8:09:39 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson