To: Jackie-O
I repeat, unless Laci left a will, Scott is her sole heir. If he is convicted of murder, he is still her heir.
314 posted on
05/31/2003 1:58:34 PM PDT by
candeee
To: candeee
No you are talking out of your butt. It was said by Nancy Grace and agreed with by Chris Pixley (Defense Attorney). A convicted murdered May NOT profit from the sale of anything. He will no longer have any property rights.
319 posted on
05/31/2003 2:02:39 PM PDT by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: candeee
Yes I know he is her sole heir! But he cannot do anything with her estate until the trial is over and if he is found not guilty.
326 posted on
05/31/2003 2:08:44 PM PDT by
Jackie-O
(Duct tape is my friend...multi purpose!)
To: candeee
I repeat, unless Laci left a will, Scott is her sole heir. If he is convicted of murder, he is still her heir. This is not true. In California, a convicted murderer may not inherit anything from his victim.
785 posted on
06/01/2003 8:56:15 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(Tagline Extermination Services, franchises available, small investment, big profit)
To: candeee
I think there's a statute in CA that prevents a person convicted of murdering someone from inheriting from the deceased.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson