Posted on 06/27/2003 8:26:54 PM PDT by fightinJAG
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:45 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Clinton: "I think it's important that people be reminded of the very significant differences between Democrats and Republicans."
Washington (CNN) -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-New York, in the midst of a national book tour and a series of fund-raisers for her Democratic colleagues, insists she's not taking any attention away from the 2004 presidential candidates.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
The Clintons keep track of their sycophants. They need to know how many will be feasting at the socialist table when Hillary gets elected and Bill becomes First Lady.
Barf Bag One:
Clinton: "I think it's important that people be reminded of the very significant differences between Democrats and Republicans."
Translation: If you compare the two administrations, the Clinton will make the Bush look terrible.
Rebuttal: Hillary, you ----ing s--t. Two dead aministration officials, 80 dead Davidians, five or six affairs, uncountable perjuries, untold numbers of obstructions of justice, one set of magicly appearing documents under subpoena, in excess of 900 FBI files, an unknown number of moles within the White House, hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of dollars in Chinese cash payments to the Clinton & DNC, uncountable passed top security documents, 100s of fleeing witnesses, many others who pleaded the 5th, and more infractions than I can write on one internet forum later, and you still don't get it? Here you major dip-stick, Bush clean, Clinton's unclean. Democrats were the enablers of the most currupt administration in US history. Nothing, not national security or crimes could stop them from pushing Bill Clinton off on the US public. End of story.
Barf Bag Two:
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-New York... ...insists she's not taking any attention away from the 2004 presidential candidates.
Translation: I know everyone's eyes are focused on the Democrat candidates. I'm trying to stay out of sight right now.
Rebuttal: Of all times to do so, you chose right now to release your book. For the last few weeks you've taken up half the air time available to Dem candidates to promote yourself via your book. Not only this, you then determined this was the best time to try to wrestle the top leadership position in the Senate away from Tom Daschle. I don't know what you could have done to suck up more air-time, but one thing is obvious, if you can come up with that idea, you'll put it in motion if it takes 110% of the airtime available to your party's candidates.
Barf Bag Three:
Clinton maintains that the best way for Democrats to campaign against another Bush term is to hold up the accomplishments of her husband's administration.
Translation: If you think about it, you'll be astounded by the good things my husband did.
Rebuttal: Astounded is the only word that came to my mind. If a person knew only one thing about the Clinton administration that would indicate what a low life pond scum he was for eight years, it would be this. Because of Bill Clinton children had to ask their parents what a blow-job in the oval office was.
Barf Bag Four:
"I think it's important that people be reminded of the very significant differences between Democrats and Republicans. And the best way to do that is look at the policies of the Clinton administration and the differences it made in the lives of so many Americans and compare that to the choices that are being made in this administration," Clinton said.
Translation: Bill made some remarkable choices during his eight years.
Rebuttal: Bombing a foreign nation for no reason at all on the night the Congress was to vote on articles of impeachment was a rather remarkable choice considering Bill knew in advance that all targets were bogus. Allowing your wife to deny Washington Detectives entry to Vince Foster's, then removing documents was another. Bill talking to a Congressman from Florida on the phone while he discussed sending our troops into harms way, while a 22 year old woman 30 years his junior was giving him oral sexual gratification was another.
Yes Mrs Clinton, people should compare the two administrations. As far as character goes, they'll find it in one of them. In the other they'll find enough criminality to sink ten administrations. Sadly you can't force the media to dig. Either the President is Republican and they want to ala Nixon, or he's a Democrat and they can't see any need for investigative reporting.
In truth this is more like a 12 to 15 bagger. The Clintons are pathalogical liars and so in need of psychological services that it's a hoot to read just about anything that blurts out of either of their mouths.
I know, I feel the same way sometimes. But, given Hillary!'s cult status with much of the media and some Americans, would/could that ever happen?
Several years ago, I shared a beer with Buzz Patterson. We had flown together briefly in the past, and I saw him at a party. He told me a couple of stories, and I thought: "Buzz--I wish you would write a book!" Well, as we all knew, he did---outlining some of the absolute worst behaviors of Hillary. And a great many people yawned.
I also had a similar conversation with a uniformed Secret Service agent who had worked in the White House since the Ford Administration. Maybe he will write a book (I doubt it), but barring releasing videotapes of Hillary! frolocking in the swimming pool at Camp David with her girlfriends, I doubt the public will care.
Here is my own theory (I know it is not worth much):
The media and a great many Americans cannot let the truth be told or get in the way of people like the Clintons, because it will get in the way of their world-view, and harm their belief in a Liberal Messiah. I don't wish to bring religion into it, but with these people, it is very similar to a cult-following. If tomorrow, a respected Republican Senator was caught with child porn, I would say: "Man, that stinks! But, God is still soverign...He is good....He is in control."
What does a liberal do at point? Point to God? In my experience, this does not happen.
They don't believe in that...but rather a social Utopia on earth that they must prop up themselves...at all costs. If they cannot believe in that, because to do so would ring in the death of their hope.
The demoness politician NEVER says anything in good hope or cheers for another soul, therefore she must be speaking of HERSELF, ya know.
This may be one of those rare times when I agree with the hag junior senator from my otherwise great state.
Yes, people need to be reminded that it was the 'rats who kicked the proverbial can down the road and declined multiple opportunities to take bin laden out of action, all because it wasn't politically popular and wouldn't have made a dent in those all-important polls and focus groups which they worship.
People also need to be reminded which party thinks that their so-called elites looks down on them and thinks that they (the alleged elites) know better how to run our lives, spend our money, raise our children, etc., than we do and that Big Gubmint is the answer to every problem in life, no matter how slight.
1. If she can be shown to have actively and maliciously conspired in the September 11 attacks.
2. If she can be shown to have ignored for political purposes a pleas for help from a child.
Perhaps Rudy can deliver the fatal political blow in '06.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.