Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD
Capitol Hill Blue ^ | July 9, 2003 | Doug Thompson

Posted on 07/09/2003 4:04:00 PM PDT by Doug Thompson

Damn, I hate it when I've been had and I've been had big time.

In 1982, while I was working for Congressman Manuel Lujan of New Mexico, a man came up to a me during a gathering in Albuquerque and introduced himself as Terrance J. Wilkinson. He said he was a security consultant and gave me a business card with his name and just a Los Angeles phone number.

A few weeks later, he called my Washington office and asked to meet for lunch. He seemed to know a lot about the nuclear labs in New Mexico and said he had conducted "security profiles" for both Los Alamos and Sandia National Labs. Lujan served on the committee with oversight on both labs and he offered his services if we ever needed briefings.

We already had nuclear experts on the committee, on loan from the Department of Energy, and we never used Wilkinson for briefings but we kept in touch over the years. He said he had served in Vietnam with Army Special Force, worked for Air America, later for the FBI and as a consultant for the CIA. He said he had helped other Republican members of Congress I called some friends in other GOP offices and they said yes, they knew Terry Wilkinson.

"You can trust him, he's one of the good guys," one chief of staff told me. When I left politics and returned to journalism, Wilkinson became a willing, but always unnamed, source.

Over the last couple of years, Wilkinson served as either a primary or secondary source on a number of stories that have appeared in Capitol Hill Blue regarding intelligence activities. In early stories, I collaborated his information with at least one more source. His information usually proved accurate and, over time, I came to depend on him as a source without additional backup.

On Tuesday, we ran a story headlined "White House admits Bush wrong about Iraqi nukes." For the first time, Wilkinsson said he was willing to go on the record and told a story about being present, as a CIA contract consultant, at two briefings with Bush. He said he was retired now and was fed up and wanted to go public.

"He (Bush) said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said in our story. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."

After the story ran, we received a number of emails or phone calls that (1) either claimed Wilkinson was lying or (2) doubted his existence. I quickly dismissed the claims. After all, I had known this guy for 20+ years and had no doubt about his credibility. Some people wanted to talk to him, so I forwarded those requests on to him via email. He didn't answer my emails, which I found odd. I should have listened to a bell that should have been going off in my ear.

Today, a White House source I know and trust said visitor logs don't have any record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever being present at a meeting with the President. Then a CIA source I trust said the agency had no record of a contract consultant with that name. "Nobody, and I mean nobody, has ever heard of this guy," my source said.

I tried calling Terry's phone number. I got a recorded message from a wireless phone provider saying the number was no longer in service. I tried a second phone number I had for him. Same result.

Then a friend from the Hill called.

"You've been had," she said. "I know about this guy. He's been around for years, claiming to have been in Special Forces, with the CIA, with NSA. He hasn't worked for any of them and his name is not Terrance Wilkinson."

Both of his phone numbers have Los Angeles area codes but an identity check through Know-X today revealed no record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever having lived in LA or surrounding communities.

His email address turns out to be a blind forward to a free email service where anyone can sign up and get an email account. Because it was not one of the usual "free" services like Hotmail, Yahoo or such, I did not recognize it as one (although you'd think that someone like me would have known better).

The bottom line is that someone has been running a con on me for 20 some years and I fell for it like a little old lady in a pigeon drop scheme. I've spent the last two hours going through the database of Capitol Hill Blue stories and removing any that were based on information from Wilkinson (or whoever he is). I've also removed his name, quotes and claims from Tuesday's story about the White House and the uranium claims.

Erasing the stories doesn't erase the fact that we ran articles containing informattion that, given the source, were most likely inaccurate. And it doesn't erase the sad fact that my own arrogance allowed me to be conned.

It will be a long time (and perhaps never) before I trust someone else who comes forward and offers inside information. The next one who does had better be prepared to produce a birth certificate, a driver's license and his grandmother's maiden name.

Any news publication exists on the trust of its readers. Because I depended on a source that was not credible, I violated the trust that the readers of Capitol Hill Blue placed in me.

I was wrong. I am sorry.

© Copyright 2003 by Capitol Hill Blue


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 20yearsofsuckerhood; admiralboorda; afoolandhissources; andstillnonames; apology; batboy; beatitdoug; bush; capitalhillblue; capitolhillbs; ccrm; chb; chump; cia; correction; corrrection; debkaneedsdoug; dougthompson; fraud; gocheckcaponesvault; hoax; inaccuracies; iraq; itsalongroadbackdoug; keywordsgohere; laughingstock; leavefrdoug; lies; longwalkshortpier; loseyourdayjob; lostcredibility; makesthenytlookgood; marcash; markash; meaculpa; media; mediabias; nosoupforyou; notreadyforprimetime; rankamateurmistake; retraction; ruinedpermanently; salonishiring; scoop; suuuuuucker; terrancejwilkinson; terrancewilkinson; thescoopthatwasnt; tookthedougforawalk; truthout; uranium; whosthefraud; wilkerson; wilkinson; wilkinsonsbitch; wmd; yourestilllyingdoug; youvebeenowneddoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 1,151-1,2001,201-1,2501,251-1,3001,301-1,336 next last
To: MEG33
I have had Fox on all day in the background. I cannot count how many times I have heard this story. Just a few minutes ago, they showed the RAT ad again. With them showing it as news over and over, they are helping promote the lie IMHO!
1,251 posted on 07/11/2003 10:55:26 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies]

To: RedWhiteBlue
I realize this, but I have been reading this thread for hours now trying to catch up. I have almost made it now, up into the posts in the 1000's. It has been difficult at best to read all of it at once!
1,252 posted on 07/11/2003 10:58:00 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Regarding your post about Hillary's role in Watergate. Here is a letter Zeifman sent to the NY Post.

Just sit back and think for a minute if a Republican ever had a former boss like Zeifman reveal that he could not give that former employee a recommendation.

Hillary Rodham's 1974 Watergate "Procedures were Ethically Flawed"

1,253 posted on 07/12/2003 12:15:21 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1223 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
lady, permit me the indulgence of a "Cliff Note" summary:

Doug Thompson: "I'm sorry, after 25 years of superprofessional behavior, I have been so dismally let's- call-it-defrauded and pretend victimization by longstanding pseudo-tormenters and created trusted rainmakers, all of whom I have called "sources within the CIA, anonymous GOP intelligence officials, senior Bush Administration insiders unnamed DC consultants close to disaffected GOP House and Senate leadership buildings, and highly placed Conservative activists."

Doug regrets his latest betrayal, and he is sad that all of his contacts couldn't be like David Brock performing his one man Tantra Massage explorations at CHB holiday party functions. He's sorry that it was revealed that none of his sources actually existed, he's troubled that his lying agenda has been exposed, and he's very sorry that Hillary Clinton will now have him seized, tortured and order that his testes be removed for her edible consuption.

lady, for your Freeper benefit, I've also gathered a mojo describing our considered Freeper response to : "F*** You Douggie!"

Luckily, he has the one man Web immovable object yet irresitstable force and handsome bon vivant watchdog TLBSHOW solidly on ReaderRant board now. Gawd ... I envy that forum. The ... volume ... of Rush Limbaugh cut and pastes and unfathomable commentary!

Hold me!

1,254 posted on 07/12/2003 1:00:40 AM PDT by ArneFufkin (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1252 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
"Just sit back and think for a minute if a Republican ever had a former boss like Zeifman reveal that he could not give that former employee a recommendation."


THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS! 2000 was during my period of irregular lurking and this is the first time I've seen this.

Not just a Republican, in 30 years of hiring people, I've never had such a statement made about ANY applicant. Zeifman's letter is absolutely damning. Particularly disturbing is the comment: "I decided that I could not recommend her for any future position of PUBLIC OR PRIVATE TRUST." She's unemployable by anyone's standard.

I've always thought the despicable HRC and her 'husband' capable of anything in their quest for power, but the words of Zeifman are enough to put fear in the heart of anyone who loves their country.

1,255 posted on 07/12/2003 1:30:41 AM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1253 | View Replies]

To: ruoflaw
I won't bother reading or posting CHB anymore, I quit reading them after they sold. And now won't bother.

Regarding your statement, the dems are dangerous but don't be too blind to our government raging out of control. This and homeland security and many fed programs and agencies make us slaves. Immigration and the upcoming globalization make good hard working families lose jobs-daily. If our government got cleaned up and stopped lining the pockets of congress and senate and big wig fed agencies it would show that outside of the two party system and or reform in a huge way is the only way our country will not go to hell in a hand cart.

1,256 posted on 07/12/2003 4:15:57 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1200 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson; William McKinley
Please,

Explain this

slowly and in plain English as I am lost way back here. Thank-you!
1,257 posted on 07/12/2003 4:41:36 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
The mystery is who owns Capitol Hill Blue. There is also an article that says a consortium owns it.

Having been to both the web site for Doug Thompson media and for Capitol Hill Blue, I have even more questions.

Sending you a freepmail.

1,258 posted on 07/12/2003 4:51:27 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1257 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; ladyinred
Email the two DT articles (dem talking points and this thread) and Wm M "games" thread to a dozen talking head/talk show hosts yesterday. Although some of the addresses sent back "not correct address" It's a start. Titled the e-mail. President Bush did NOT lie! And stated inside. "Would you believe a "Vast Left Wing Conspiracy?"
1,259 posted on 07/12/2003 4:55:14 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1231 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Quote from the post in 1257.

"We intend to use Blue as a test bed for new techniques and concepts for web journalism," Lowrey said.

Lying, spinning and confusing in nothing new. Ask the DNC.

1,260 posted on 07/12/2003 4:59:12 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1258 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
HAHAHAHAH

I LOVE IT Arne!!!
1,261 posted on 07/12/2003 5:06:05 AM PDT by Neets (Sometimes you feel like a nut; sometimes you are a nut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1254 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
You should repost this to a thread on a regular monthly basis. Just to remind everyone!
1,262 posted on 07/12/2003 5:15:22 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1253 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; piasa; Miss Marple
Capitol Hill Blue Sold

No more unnamed sources - Doug Thomson - Capitol Hill Blue

Did Capitol Hill Blue Post An Article With Fabrications?

The TRUE Capitol Hill Blue story the PRESS IGNORED:'Dems plan to undermine America to beat Bush'

The madman of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue- CAPITOL HILL BLUE

Writer apologizes for "Madman of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue" column Capitol Hill Blue ^ | February 26, 2003 | DOUG THOMPSON

BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD

Terrance J. Wilkinson?

Is McKinley metaphor right for Bush?

Republicans Admire Bill . . . McKinley, That Is


1,263 posted on 07/12/2003 5:31:41 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1262 | View Replies]

To: windchime
Not just a Republican, in 30 years of hiring people, I've never had such a statement made about ANY applicant. Zeifman's letter is absolutely damning. Particularly disturbing is the comment: "I decided that I could not recommend her for any future position of PUBLIC OR PRIVATE TRUST." She's unemployable by anyone's standard.

And consider this....according to Hillary's book, she flunked the bar exam about this time too. She was and is definitely unemployable. That's why she ran for Senate.

1,264 posted on 07/12/2003 6:02:41 AM PDT by Lauratealeaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1255 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Great!
1,265 posted on 07/12/2003 6:28:03 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1263 | View Replies]

To: Lauratealeaf
A truth will out bump.
1,266 posted on 07/12/2003 7:19:09 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1264 | View Replies]

To: Peach
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/944856/posts?page=16#16

BUMP
1,267 posted on 07/12/2003 8:06:56 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1266 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Glad you linked that article where Straw defended uranium sources and intel. A truth will out bump.
1,268 posted on 07/12/2003 8:26:17 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1267 | View Replies]

To: Neets
I promised myself that I wasn't going to be bitter that JimRob pulled the ejection seat handle on the irrepressible "Artist formerly known as Todd", even if my TLBSHOW bobble-head doll promotional gold mine is deeply in the crapper. You think I can move 10,000 head bobbing keepsakes over at LibertyPost? Maybe a "Treason"/TLBobblehead co-marketing program with that one blonde chick who is definitely sweet on me?

I hope it's not too late to cancel the production startup of the TLBSHOW action figure line.

1,269 posted on 07/12/2003 8:48:24 AM PDT by ArneFufkin (Free Terry Wilkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1261 | View Replies]

To: Peach
A truth will out bump

Don't bet on it from the committed saboteurs in Pinch Sulzberger's "It's Raining Men" parlor/dungeon.

I've had little interest in the "All the News that little twerp tells us to Print" New York Times since they quit running photos of fetching Topless Models on Page 6.

I'm not interested in exploring Maureen Dowd's "Summer of Sag" Southampton swimwear line. The dents and folds and unidentifiable protrusions ... it made me cry.

1,270 posted on 07/12/2003 9:06:55 AM PDT by ArneFufkin (Free Terry Wilkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1266 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Applause!!!

I agree completely with #812. Very well stated.

1,271 posted on 07/12/2003 9:21:24 AM PDT by jellybean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
It's not like we've ever had trouble with a guy whose last name is "Thompson" 'round here.

Maybe Doug can hire Jack to file a class action lawsuit against all CIA operatives, Los Angeles gumshoes, Freelance sensitive intelligence impresarios and everyone, everywhere who may be Terrance J. Wilkinson, or a reputedly lesbian and Miami Mob-blackmailed Attorney General of the United States who may have served in the 1992-2000 timeframe.

Yes, the logical first move is to depose Larry Klayman.

1,272 posted on 07/12/2003 10:13:58 AM PDT by ArneFufkin (Free Terry Wilkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1258 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I don't agree with everything that this administration does however I trust and like President Bush...I believe that he is a decent human being....and I can't say that about any of the democrats that want want to run against him. I will vote for President Bush in good conscience.
1,273 posted on 07/12/2003 10:14:19 AM PDT by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1256 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
I see that you have noticed some similarities as well. HA!

How many times are we going to be suckered by these "perfect" conservatives and "watchdogs" of government before we understand that they are suckering us in?

David Brock, Larry Klayman, Doug Thompson, etc. etc.

Well, that comment should add about 500 posts to the thread! HA!

1,274 posted on 07/12/2003 10:35:31 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1272 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin; Miss Marple
Awww jeesh, now you both gone done and did it.

Time for yet ANOTHER martini....keep em coming and i'll be smashed by 3 pm.
1,275 posted on 07/12/2003 10:41:57 AM PDT by Neets (Sometimes you feel like a nut; sometimes you are a nut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1272 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Instigator!
1,276 posted on 07/12/2003 10:54:21 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1274 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
We intend to use Blue as a test bed for new techniques and concepts for web journalism

"We are also looking to explore a radical new concept in interpersonal messaging we've tentatively named "E-mail". We're going to drive this E-mail concept on the lightning quick 33.6 mhz/second Motorola serial modem on Compaq's Powerpacked Deskpro 286/12mhz platform stuffed with 8 megabytes of supercharged RAM. Look for our first "Webpaper" offering, featuring the meteoric rise of hip-hop superstar Vanilla Ice."

For the Capitol Hill Journalism Project:

Mystery Masked Man from Parts Unknown: Publisher

Brilliant anonymous Motor Champion Racer X: Editor in Chief

Unnamed Veteran Intelligence insider familiar with High Level White House Officials previously involved in sensitive discussions between Senior Bush Advisors close to Bush's inner circle of National Security confidants. Speaking On Condition of Anonymity: Staff Reporter

1,277 posted on 07/12/2003 11:25:45 AM PDT by ArneFufkin (Free Terry Wilkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1260 | View Replies]

To: Lauratealeaf
"And consider this....according to Hillary's book, she flunked the bar exam about this time too. She was and is definitely unemployable. That's why she ran for Senate."



....and serves on the Armed Services Committee. No public or private trust required there. Heaven help us!
1,278 posted on 07/12/2003 11:28:02 AM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1264 | View Replies]

To: windchime
....and serves on the Armed Services Committee. No public or private trust required there. Heaven help us!

That is such a travesty!

1,279 posted on 07/12/2003 11:31:10 AM PDT by Lauratealeaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1278 | View Replies]

To: Lauratealeaf
Yes.
1,280 posted on 07/12/2003 11:34:57 AM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1279 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I rang up the boys in the Mathematics Lounge over at MIT, and we crunched numbers and concluded that there is a 99.8% probablility that the imposter presenting himself as Terrance J. Wilkinson is on Judicial Watch's direct mail list.

So, we've narrowed it down to the 3.5 billion humans on the Planet Earth and the three guys on the Russian Space Station.

1,281 posted on 07/12/2003 11:40:47 AM PDT by ArneFufkin (Free Terry Wilkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1274 | View Replies]

To: Pegita
bump!
1,282 posted on 07/12/2003 12:05:34 PM PDT by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1281 | View Replies]

To: Neets
Hey, I am having a martini, too! I found it keeps my tin-foil hat from itching!

Well, I got three more flower beds weeded and I have been thinking while pulling up thistles and spurge.

As I said, we have now three examples of people who turned on the conservative/Republicans after they had used us as cash cows. I am asking myself if this is a coincidence. My answer is after three instances, no.

If I were wanting to get information from the people on the right, I would send double agents in to win confidence and get information.

Now, I will get some tin-foil to make a complete outfit.

1,283 posted on 07/12/2003 12:11:38 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1275 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
You might very well be onto something. Or ON something! haha

I always wondered about Klayman and why he was never able to follow through - figured he was a straw man only out for the attention but it has happened the same way a few times now. Hmmmm

1,284 posted on 07/12/2003 12:30:29 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1283 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
They don't have to have real dirt on Rice. If they can twist one statement, they're in business. and if they can't find one to twist, they can always assing to he some fictional statement some fictional source or some democrat operative claims to have heard. As we see here, all they need do is make it up out of thin air, feed it to some unnamed source and a gazillion apparently unrelated (but in truth, incestuous) web sites through a few trolls who are willing to lie about "witnessing" it or lie about having a source who did, and then some lazy journalist or fellow traveler in the mainstream media will pick it up and print it without leaving a hint as to where he or she obtained it, and then the very fact that it is now in the mainstram media gives the fantasy story the illusion of credibility. The average person will then assume the original obscure and sources who first published it are only reprinting what was "found and vetted" in the mainstream media, not knowing that the information was never vetted and is fictional.

Worse, the mythical source might even disappear with some scrubbing like we're seeing now, so that it becomes virtually impossible to clear up the myth, because the mainstream press isn't going to get interested in whether or not some obscure web site's stories were fabricated. The mainstream media is too big and egotistical to admit thay were duped by some obscure web author's story, too stupid to see how the circle of deception works, and too unethical to care.

Instead of the mainstream media doing real investigative journalism and breaking new information, it's extremists fabricating myths and using the laziness of the mainstream media to sugarcoat it for the consumption of people who wouldn't ever trust something like "Red Flags Weekly" as a source.

IOW, any player who wants to smear Rice can do like they do with anyone else they have ever smeared.

It's like them trying to scapegoat Tenet (and there have been concerted efforts to misquote him since 911) for the Africa comment- because "we went to war on false data Bush presented in the SOTU address" - when the Congress, including the Democrats, had already voted for it long before the SOTU address. If there are pending investigations on Iraq and african nations, Tenet can't use them to defend himself publicly because they are, obviously, classified, and for the protection of operatives in the field, he had better keep his mouth shut, because congress can't, and some of the least trustworthy people in the DNC are on the Senate intelligence committee.

And this is like what the Democrats pulled with their intel briefings- which were also attended, of course, by Republicans on the committee. The Democrats would come out in the weeks after 911 and claim they "weren't told," when in fact they were at the very same committee meeting where they and the republicans were told. They then tried to claim there weren't enough briefings to answer their questions, when Rumsfeld had briefings with them several times a week and they could ask him questions at any time. These Democrats are chronic liars.

You would think they would start to wonder why they think their ideology is superior if they have to lie about these things so blatantly just to sustain it.

The rats will probably try to plaster Rice with blame for not planning for every one of the infinite ways a free and open society like ours is threatened, and there were threats on everything from our nuke labs to assassinations. You know, the Democrats will try to tell us all how Rice should have done something in the months after she was confirmed- when after all, the Democrats spent eight years trying to warn us about "domestic terrorists" citing the constitution at traffic stops, hanging pictures of aborted fetuses on things, sawing their otherwise legal shotguns a quarter inch too short, or wearing penny loafers to protests demanding that ballots be counted in public and in front of the media. The conservatives had fair warning from Clinton that as soon as the Democrats left office, condi Rice should quickly attend to Al Qaeda because the democrats were just too busy. (Pardon the sarcasm) :o)

1,285 posted on 07/12/2003 1:49:08 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1232 | View Replies]

To: piasa
the can always assing to he some

Good grief,this should say "they can always assign to her some..."

Lefties, asses, lefties, asses, what's the diff.

1,286 posted on 07/12/2003 2:03:42 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1285 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Children and those who live in a world of their own mind, demand/wish for the impossible. Adults accept reality and work in the realm of the possible.

Well said, all around.

And now it's time for those of us who haven't done so already to roll up our sleeves, because the Devil's been busy in our backyard.

1,287 posted on 07/12/2003 3:25:59 PM PDT by Imal (The currents of history are running strong and swift through our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1196 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
I have almost made it now, up into the posts in the 1000's. It has been difficult at best to read all of it at once!

I know exactly what you mean. I came in late, too, and this particular thread has an incredibly high signal-to-noise ratio, meaning that nearly every post requires a fair amount of reading and digesting before proceeding.

I almost never jump into threads that have reached post numbers in the four digits, but I'm glad I did in this case because, as Samwise Gamgee might put it, "Now there's an eye-opener and no mistake!"

So welcome, friend, to this thread's Latecomer's Club. Be sure to fill out a name tag and introduce yourself. :^)

1,288 posted on 07/12/2003 4:01:38 PM PDT by Imal (If I had a dime for every time Bush's critics were right about him, I'd need to borrow a dime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1252 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Lol... Perfect analysis all the way around.

And it isn't coincidental that the Democrat's party symbol is an ass, is ti?
1,289 posted on 07/12/2003 5:02:13 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1286 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
ti=it, in my version of creative English through typos.
1,290 posted on 07/12/2003 5:04:26 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1289 | View Replies]

To: Imal
And now it's time for those of us who haven't done so already to roll up our sleeves, because the Devil's been busy in our backyard.

I like that line. Should be the line of the week.

1,291 posted on 07/12/2003 5:09:34 PM PDT by Lauratealeaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1287 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Damn, I feel (bleep) too! Thanks for posting your story and thoughts, also, please do all you can to undo the wrong this devious creep has done.
1,292 posted on 07/12/2003 6:58:38 PM PDT by harpo11 (All the democrats can do is bitch at Bush just because he took down a murdering dictator thug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Thank you.

It's time for ALL of us to ban together and work diligently to get GOPERs eleceted in '04. With only the slimest of a majority in the Senate and far too many " moderates " ( liberal Republicans ) in far too many seats in both Houses, our ONLY goal has to be to re-elect President Bush and to give him a HUGE majority in both Houses. Then and only then, will we get more of what all Conservatives want.

It's impossible to roll back 60+years of the creeping Liberal SOCIALIAM in a brief spam of one or even two terms. Like the Dems, we have to accept incrimentalsim. We didn't get here over night and the mess can't be undone in the blink of an eye.

Right now, we have a great shot at reshaping the Supremem Court and add Conservative judges all over the country as well. So, roll up those sleeves, contribute money,time,and effort as never before. The Devil won't be our undoing, if we don't let him be.

1,293 posted on 07/12/2003 8:26:12 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1287 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Well, I'm doing my part. When the going gets tough, the tough start blogging!

The World According to Imal

1,294 posted on 07/12/2003 9:19:32 PM PDT by Imal (The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1293 | View Replies]

To: Imal
WOW ! You certainly are doing your bit. Thanks for the link. I've read some of your BLOG and shall return to read more of it.
Now, roll up those sleeves higher and get to work in the REAL world too. :-)
1,295 posted on 07/12/2003 9:24:31 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1294 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Be sure to read the whole blog, because carefully hidden in each of my blog posts is a link to a website that will pay you $100 just for reading my material. Collect every box top you find!

As for getting to work in the real world, I feel compelled to quote Ned Flander's mom: "We've tried nothing, and we're all out of ideas!"

There are, of course, a few things I do here and there to make the world a better place. Voting against socialism is among them. However, in an ideological war, exposing evil ideologies and promoting good ones is a frontline assignment.

I am now looking into ways I can do that more effectively, aside from my humble and nascent blogsite. If any pan out, you'll hear about it. :^)

In the end, however, the most important thing any of us can do is keep telling the truth, telling it loudly, and telling it often.

1,296 posted on 07/12/2003 9:54:33 PM PDT by Imal (The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1295 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Post #1293 well stated. I agree with you 100%.
1,297 posted on 07/12/2003 10:09:07 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1293 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
This led to much research on the whole drum beat of "Bush misled us".Of course the media doesn't bother with a lot of these things.Until some news comes along that crowds it out..this is going to be the media's focus.The Dems won't stop ever!
1,298 posted on 07/15/2003 3:33:01 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kip Lange
#1298 I hit the wrong poster button!
1,299 posted on 07/15/2003 3:35:49 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1298 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Hmmm. As you most likely know, I certainly don't think Bush misled us (I was for crossing swords with Iraq far before 9/11). To repeat my worst case scenario...the intelligence agencies possibly lowered their threshold for what was a threat and what was not a threat in the wake of 9/11 after being tarred with the, "Oh my God you didn't tell us Arabs could fly planes into buildings instead of just hijacking them! You *bastards*!"

Still don't think it happened, though. Then again, I've never been to Iraq, so heck, the whole place might not even exist...the intelligence community has got to be steaming (or readying to unleash both barrels of WMD evidence at the proper time) over this.

As for the writer's apology, well, I'm not a great believe in apologies for biggies like this one. I'll take, "Oh, I'm terribly sorry, I dinged your car," but not, "I was duped by a super-secret non-existent con-man who was so good he fooled me for 20 years into thinking he was Special Ops."

Sounds more like they just needed heads to roll...
1,300 posted on 07/15/2003 3:45:41 AM PDT by Kip Lange ("And yet it moves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1298 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 1,151-1,2001,201-1,2501,251-1,3001,301-1,336 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson