Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD
Capitol Hill Blue ^ | July 9, 2003 | Doug Thompson

Posted on 07/09/2003 4:04:00 PM PDT by Doug Thompson

Damn, I hate it when I've been had and I've been had big time.

In 1982, while I was working for Congressman Manuel Lujan of New Mexico, a man came up to a me during a gathering in Albuquerque and introduced himself as Terrance J. Wilkinson. He said he was a security consultant and gave me a business card with his name and just a Los Angeles phone number.

A few weeks later, he called my Washington office and asked to meet for lunch. He seemed to know a lot about the nuclear labs in New Mexico and said he had conducted "security profiles" for both Los Alamos and Sandia National Labs. Lujan served on the committee with oversight on both labs and he offered his services if we ever needed briefings.

We already had nuclear experts on the committee, on loan from the Department of Energy, and we never used Wilkinson for briefings but we kept in touch over the years. He said he had served in Vietnam with Army Special Force, worked for Air America, later for the FBI and as a consultant for the CIA. He said he had helped other Republican members of Congress I called some friends in other GOP offices and they said yes, they knew Terry Wilkinson.

"You can trust him, he's one of the good guys," one chief of staff told me. When I left politics and returned to journalism, Wilkinson became a willing, but always unnamed, source.

Over the last couple of years, Wilkinson served as either a primary or secondary source on a number of stories that have appeared in Capitol Hill Blue regarding intelligence activities. In early stories, I collaborated his information with at least one more source. His information usually proved accurate and, over time, I came to depend on him as a source without additional backup.

On Tuesday, we ran a story headlined "White House admits Bush wrong about Iraqi nukes." For the first time, Wilkinsson said he was willing to go on the record and told a story about being present, as a CIA contract consultant, at two briefings with Bush. He said he was retired now and was fed up and wanted to go public.

"He (Bush) said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said in our story. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."

After the story ran, we received a number of emails or phone calls that (1) either claimed Wilkinson was lying or (2) doubted his existence. I quickly dismissed the claims. After all, I had known this guy for 20+ years and had no doubt about his credibility. Some people wanted to talk to him, so I forwarded those requests on to him via email. He didn't answer my emails, which I found odd. I should have listened to a bell that should have been going off in my ear.

Today, a White House source I know and trust said visitor logs don't have any record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever being present at a meeting with the President. Then a CIA source I trust said the agency had no record of a contract consultant with that name. "Nobody, and I mean nobody, has ever heard of this guy," my source said.

I tried calling Terry's phone number. I got a recorded message from a wireless phone provider saying the number was no longer in service. I tried a second phone number I had for him. Same result.

Then a friend from the Hill called.

"You've been had," she said. "I know about this guy. He's been around for years, claiming to have been in Special Forces, with the CIA, with NSA. He hasn't worked for any of them and his name is not Terrance Wilkinson."

Both of his phone numbers have Los Angeles area codes but an identity check through Know-X today revealed no record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever having lived in LA or surrounding communities.

His email address turns out to be a blind forward to a free email service where anyone can sign up and get an email account. Because it was not one of the usual "free" services like Hotmail, Yahoo or such, I did not recognize it as one (although you'd think that someone like me would have known better).

The bottom line is that someone has been running a con on me for 20 some years and I fell for it like a little old lady in a pigeon drop scheme. I've spent the last two hours going through the database of Capitol Hill Blue stories and removing any that were based on information from Wilkinson (or whoever he is). I've also removed his name, quotes and claims from Tuesday's story about the White House and the uranium claims.

Erasing the stories doesn't erase the fact that we ran articles containing informattion that, given the source, were most likely inaccurate. And it doesn't erase the sad fact that my own arrogance allowed me to be conned.

It will be a long time (and perhaps never) before I trust someone else who comes forward and offers inside information. The next one who does had better be prepared to produce a birth certificate, a driver's license and his grandmother's maiden name.

Any news publication exists on the trust of its readers. Because I depended on a source that was not credible, I violated the trust that the readers of Capitol Hill Blue placed in me.

I was wrong. I am sorry.

© Copyright 2003 by Capitol Hill Blue


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 20yearsofsuckerhood; admiralboorda; afoolandhissources; andstillnonames; apology; batboy; beatitdoug; bush; capitalhillblue; capitolhillbs; ccrm; chb; chump; cia; correction; corrrection; debkaneedsdoug; dougthompson; fraud; gocheckcaponesvault; hoax; inaccuracies; iraq; itsalongroadbackdoug; keywordsgohere; laughingstock; leavefrdoug; lies; longwalkshortpier; loseyourdayjob; lostcredibility; makesthenytlookgood; marcash; markash; meaculpa; media; mediabias; nosoupforyou; notreadyforprimetime; rankamateurmistake; retraction; ruinedpermanently; salonishiring; scoop; suuuuuucker; terrancejwilkinson; terrancewilkinson; thescoopthatwasnt; tookthedougforawalk; truthout; uranium; whosthefraud; wilkerson; wilkinson; wilkinsonsbitch; wmd; yourestilllyingdoug; youvebeenowneddoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 1,321-1,337 next last
To: ladyinred
Sounds like a good campaign for spam! :)
1,241 posted on 07/11/2003 10:19:34 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1228 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife; nopardons
This is very interesting, since I generally read the vast majority of the thread from the end to the beginning! So, I get a preview of the ignorance that is sitting at the top of the thread! Ha!

At the risk of upsetting a few antiFR's, LOL!

1,242 posted on 07/11/2003 10:27:32 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1107 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I did I did, honest! I came into this late, and once I started reading the thread I realized who he is, and I had read those other posts where he bashed Bush!!!!
1,243 posted on 07/11/2003 10:31:46 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Changed your mind, have you ? :-)
1,244 posted on 07/11/2003 10:36:11 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1243 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
:-)
1,245 posted on 07/11/2003 10:36:43 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1242 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
The one post that really floored me was when he explained that he had written it because he had a bad day or some such nonsense! HAH!
Forgiven yet? :-)
1,246 posted on 07/11/2003 10:37:23 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1122 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Not quite, Fred Barnes did a good job.
1,247 posted on 07/11/2003 10:39:01 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1231 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Hitlery! wants '08. Bubba wasn't prepared, when he got it in '92. They know this and just as the '92 was supposed to only be a trial balloon, to position him for "96, so it is now with HRC. She knows what '92 was like. She doesn't want to repeat that.

That all being said, that harriden scares me too.

1,248 posted on 07/11/2003 10:42:28 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1229 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Here's one I liked from the linked article: www.bushcoup.com Registered to: David Lytel, Democrats.com, P.O. Box 20594 (New York, N.Y.) Domain record created on: 11-01-2000 (six days BEFORE the election) Phone contact: 123-456-7890 Purpose: Web site claiming Bush stole the election (formatted in an extremely similar manner to several other sites owned by Democrats.com).

I am amazed at this. Thanks so much.

1,249 posted on 07/11/2003 10:43:31 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1136 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Of course you are " forgiven "; heck, you have a full and complete PARDON ! :-)

Ahhhhhhhhh ... I see you've remember the other ridiculous " apology ". LOL

1,250 posted on 07/11/2003 10:48:48 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1246 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
I have had Fox on all day in the background. I cannot count how many times I have heard this story. Just a few minutes ago, they showed the RAT ad again. With them showing it as news over and over, they are helping promote the lie IMHO!
1,251 posted on 07/11/2003 10:55:26 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies]

To: RedWhiteBlue
I realize this, but I have been reading this thread for hours now trying to catch up. I have almost made it now, up into the posts in the 1000's. It has been difficult at best to read all of it at once!
1,252 posted on 07/11/2003 10:58:00 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Regarding your post about Hillary's role in Watergate. Here is a letter Zeifman sent to the NY Post.

Just sit back and think for a minute if a Republican ever had a former boss like Zeifman reveal that he could not give that former employee a recommendation.

Hillary Rodham's 1974 Watergate "Procedures were Ethically Flawed"

1,253 posted on 07/12/2003 12:15:21 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1223 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
lady, permit me the indulgence of a "Cliff Note" summary:

Doug Thompson: "I'm sorry, after 25 years of superprofessional behavior, I have been so dismally let's- call-it-defrauded and pretend victimization by longstanding pseudo-tormenters and created trusted rainmakers, all of whom I have called "sources within the CIA, anonymous GOP intelligence officials, senior Bush Administration insiders unnamed DC consultants close to disaffected GOP House and Senate leadership buildings, and highly placed Conservative activists."

Doug regrets his latest betrayal, and he is sad that all of his contacts couldn't be like David Brock performing his one man Tantra Massage explorations at CHB holiday party functions. He's sorry that it was revealed that none of his sources actually existed, he's troubled that his lying agenda has been exposed, and he's very sorry that Hillary Clinton will now have him seized, tortured and order that his testes be removed for her edible consuption.

lady, for your Freeper benefit, I've also gathered a mojo describing our considered Freeper response to : "F*** You Douggie!"

Luckily, he has the one man Web immovable object yet irresitstable force and handsome bon vivant watchdog TLBSHOW solidly on ReaderRant board now. Gawd ... I envy that forum. The ... volume ... of Rush Limbaugh cut and pastes and unfathomable commentary!

Hold me!

1,254 posted on 07/12/2003 1:00:40 AM PDT by ArneFufkin (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1252 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
"Just sit back and think for a minute if a Republican ever had a former boss like Zeifman reveal that he could not give that former employee a recommendation."


THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS! 2000 was during my period of irregular lurking and this is the first time I've seen this.

Not just a Republican, in 30 years of hiring people, I've never had such a statement made about ANY applicant. Zeifman's letter is absolutely damning. Particularly disturbing is the comment: "I decided that I could not recommend her for any future position of PUBLIC OR PRIVATE TRUST." She's unemployable by anyone's standard.

I've always thought the despicable HRC and her 'husband' capable of anything in their quest for power, but the words of Zeifman are enough to put fear in the heart of anyone who loves their country.

1,255 posted on 07/12/2003 1:30:41 AM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1253 | View Replies]

To: ruoflaw
I won't bother reading or posting CHB anymore, I quit reading them after they sold. And now won't bother.

Regarding your statement, the dems are dangerous but don't be too blind to our government raging out of control. This and homeland security and many fed programs and agencies make us slaves. Immigration and the upcoming globalization make good hard working families lose jobs-daily. If our government got cleaned up and stopped lining the pockets of congress and senate and big wig fed agencies it would show that outside of the two party system and or reform in a huge way is the only way our country will not go to hell in a hand cart.

1,256 posted on 07/12/2003 4:15:57 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1200 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson; William McKinley
Please,

Explain this

slowly and in plain English as I am lost way back here. Thank-you!
1,257 posted on 07/12/2003 4:41:36 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
The mystery is who owns Capitol Hill Blue. There is also an article that says a consortium owns it.

Having been to both the web site for Doug Thompson media and for Capitol Hill Blue, I have even more questions.

Sending you a freepmail.

1,258 posted on 07/12/2003 4:51:27 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1257 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; ladyinred
Email the two DT articles (dem talking points and this thread) and Wm M "games" thread to a dozen talking head/talk show hosts yesterday. Although some of the addresses sent back "not correct address" It's a start. Titled the e-mail. President Bush did NOT lie! And stated inside. "Would you believe a "Vast Left Wing Conspiracy?"
1,259 posted on 07/12/2003 4:55:14 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1231 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Quote from the post in 1257.

"We intend to use Blue as a test bed for new techniques and concepts for web journalism," Lowrey said.

Lying, spinning and confusing in nothing new. Ask the DNC.

1,260 posted on 07/12/2003 4:59:12 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1258 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 1,321-1,337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson