Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret papers tell how RAF hunted aliens
The Observer ^ | Sunday July 6, 2003 | Paul Harris

Posted on 07/14/2003 3:29:14 PM PDT by demlosers

They have been the subject of derision for claiming aliens have visited Earth from outer space, but believers in the existence of UFOs were this weekend excitedly poring over newly released military documents that show how fighter aircraft were scrambled to intercept strange shapes in Britain's skies. The secret papers obtained from the US military give an insight into an astonishing chain of events sparked by UFO sightings over East Anglia in 1956.

After receiving numerous calls reporting bright lights darting across the sky, fighters from RAF Lakenheath spent more than seven hours trying to shoot down the objects, which were picked up on army radar screens.

The classified documents were secured under the US Freedom of Information Act by Dave Clarke, an author researching the subject.

One US Air Force intelligence report described how '12 to 15' objects were picked up on radar screens on 13 August 1956. They were tracked for more than 50 miles. One object was logged travelling at 4,000mph. 'Operators making these radar sightings are of the opinion that malfunctions of equipment did not cause these radar sightings,' the document said.

The radar logs describe white lights darting across the skies. At times, the objects travelled in formation and performed sharp turns.

One document describes how an object was tracked by radar for 26 miles, before it hovered for five minutes then flew away again.

A cable was sent from US Air Force Headquarters in Washington warning of the 'considerable interest and concern' at the sightings and demanding an immediate inquiry. The cable asked if they were linked to a similar scare reported by a British radar station on the Danish island of Bornholm in the Baltic Sea a week later.

Most UFO sightings are explained by phenomena such as clouds, weather balloons or unusual atmospheric events. At the time of the 'Lakenheath incident', observers did report an unusual level of meteorite activity. Meteors, and the trails they leave behind, can register on radars and critics have said this explains the Lakenheath incident.

Astronomical phenomena are also considered a possible cause. One pilot sent up to intercept the objects reported 'chasing a star.' Others described objects they were able to 'lock on' to with their radar systems but that then manoeuvred around them.

But for UFO believers the new documents confirm their Lakenheath sightings as the most dramatic of British UFO encounters and provide proof that alien craft have 'buzzed' Britain for the past 50 years. 'I am absolutely convinced they were breaches of our airspace by some extraordinary flying machines,' said Graham Birdsall, editor of UFO magazine.

Clarke admitted this weekend it was difficult to attribute all the visual sightings and radar activity both from the ground and the on-board radar systems to meteorites or weather conditions. He believes the incident was treated so seriously by the military that it sparked a Cold War security scare. By 1956, the RAF Lakenheath air base, where the fighters were scrambled from, was on the front line of the geopolitical divide. Lakenheath played host to the new super-sensitive American U-2 spy planes and also provided storage facilities for atomic bombs.

Clues to solving the mystery may still lie in secret US archives. After being told no more documentation existed, Clarke discovered a reference to a further document on the incident in the US National Archives. He has logged a request to release it. All British reports were destroyed in a fire five years after the event, according to RAF records.

Clarke believes the incident had such serious security implications that documents must still exist. 'I am a UFO sceptic but this is an incident that has me baffled. It is just possible that some form of Soviet spy craft was responsible, but difficult to match any of their planes to what was observed at the time,' he said.

paul.harris@observer.co.uk


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: raf; ufo

1 posted on 07/14/2003 3:29:14 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers; Mulder; Scully
Ok lets ping Mulder and Scuilly..
2 posted on 07/14/2003 3:32:16 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
SHOW ME THE MONEY !!!


3 posted on 07/14/2003 3:34:02 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
They weren't very good hunters.

They never found me.
4 posted on 07/14/2003 3:52:35 PM PDT by bigj00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
UFO's on radar rule out alien civilizations in my eyes. If the aliens have the ability to travel over thousands of light years, I would bet they have mastered stealth technology.
5 posted on 07/14/2003 3:59:02 PM PDT by Mr.Clark (From the darkness....I shall come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
The sad thing is, the scenario goes like this:

(1) Unusual radar and visual sightings occur. They indicate that "something" that can generate a radar return is demonstrating speed and manuever characteristics that do not fit the profile of known aircraft.

(2) Since it cannot be explained, it gets classified and buried.

(3) Ergo, it must be aliens.

No other explanations are encouraged, no real investigations are done. Of course, there are a zillion reasons why it is extremely unlikely to be space aliens. But, no valid alternative explanations are put forward either because the loonies are convinced it is ET.

6 posted on 07/14/2003 3:59:29 PM PDT by dark_lord (The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Very solid swamp gas.
7 posted on 07/14/2003 4:00:30 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Sounds pretty interesting to me.
8 posted on 07/14/2003 4:04:42 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
"All your base are belong to us!" (Obligatory alien response.
9 posted on 07/14/2003 4:06:10 PM PDT by StacyMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers; andysandmikesmom; areafiftyone; bigfootbob; Ecliptic; El Sordo; gcruse; Ghengis; ...
PING RE new docs available from British military about searching for ET's etc.
10 posted on 07/14/2003 4:07:19 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
What an insensitive and un-PC headline... Shouldn't it be "Secret papers tell how RAF hunted undocumented persons from space"?
11 posted on 07/14/2003 4:08:51 PM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark
Many times radar doesn't pick them up.

Sometimes they blip on and off the radar sweep screen as though blipping in and out of this reality.

Sometimes they are solidly on the radar scans for 45 minutes or some such.

I don't think you have sufficient perspective in time nor distance nor omnicient knowledge to make a dogmatic statement on such a complex and WIDELY diversed set of phenomena.
12 posted on 07/14/2003 4:09:27 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Alrighty then.
13 posted on 07/14/2003 4:12:47 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: setcapt
Gort, Klaatu..........
15 posted on 07/14/2003 5:36:03 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Funny, there are quite a few UFO radar stories from the 50's. I wonder if they are still being tracked that way.
16 posted on 07/14/2003 6:08:21 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
My understanding is that they are but that reporting has changed. And I'm not sure if any details if that much.

There seems to be a greater aversion to having radar records widely available of such. They'd rather not have the record than risk too much exposure seems to be my impression. But what do I know!
17 posted on 07/14/2003 8:34:48 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
My understanding is that they are but that reporting has changed. And I'm not sure if any details if that much.

There seems to be a greater aversion to having radar records widely available of such. They'd rather not have the record than risk too much exposure seems to be my impression. But what do I know!
18 posted on 07/14/2003 8:34:49 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson