Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX NEWS: Rev. Gene Robinson Confirmed As Episcopal Church Bishop
Fox News Live

Posted on 08/05/2003 5:07:32 PM PDT by Brian S

Rev. Gene Robinson Confirmed As Episcopal Church Bishop


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 62to45vote; 62votes; anglican; bishop; bungholebuddies; buttholesurfers; buttpirate; christianlist; confirmed; episcopal; fallout; gay; generalconvention; generobinson; gerbilinserters; herecomedajudge; hijackedbygaybishop; hivpositiveperverts; homosexual; homosexualagenda; lawsuitsdotcom; penniesfromheaven; queer; sodomgommorah; sodomites; trialbyvictims
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 501-504 next last
Comment #141 Removed by Moderator

To: Destro
Their justification is that the church must change with the times. Scripture must be interpreted in light of the time it was written in. Since it is now culturally acceptable to be gay, so goes the church. What a joke!
142 posted on 08/05/2003 5:57:28 PM PDT by k omalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb
The only hope (?) is if the conservative Episcopalians split (starting in October?) and the ELCA mis-leaders get scared that their budget will go down the drain when our conservatives split as well. I almost surely will be part of any such exodus, and I won't be quiet about it.

My daughter married an Episcoplian. He has spoken with his pastor in Northern Georgia to tell him that his family could no longer attend the Episcopal Church should this fellow become a bishop.

His pastor told him that leaving that church would not be necessary because they would split from the US Episcopal Church.

That made Grandpa, that's me, a happy guy.

143 posted on 08/05/2003 5:57:46 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Destro
but what justification in scripture do they find to accept homosexuality?

My guess is that those doing the 'justification' don't believe in the bible, or rather believe that it was written by man and thus contains errors. I am not kidding about that, you be amazed at how many mainstream denomination leaders will state that. Or perhaps they are of the branch that believes the bible to be a loose-leaf document....

144 posted on 08/05/2003 5:57:51 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
How about Episcogaylymans?
145 posted on 08/05/2003 5:58:07 PM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
As an admirer of the Book of Common Prayer and other traditional Anglican usages, I thank you for those links. it's a possible alternative for orthodox Catholics who are in despair over the liberal rot in the American RC church, too.
146 posted on 08/05/2003 5:58:12 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: k omalley
Their justification is that the church must change with the times. Scripture must be interpreted in light of the time it was written in. Since it is now culturally acceptable to be gay, so goes the church. What a joke!

They would make excellent federal judges.

147 posted on 08/05/2003 5:58:35 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp; NYer; ninenot; BlackElk; LurkingSince'98; Cicero; TomB; heyheyhey; sandyeggo; MadIvan; ...
Ping
148 posted on 08/05/2003 5:58:56 PM PDT by Barnacle (A Human Shield against the onslaught of Leftist tripe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: k omalley
Change with the times.....how silly.

That is why Jesus died on the cross ... he would not change with the times.
149 posted on 08/05/2003 5:59:41 PM PDT by Mfkmmof4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Or Episcogaylymen.
150 posted on 08/05/2003 5:59:48 PM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
At least I'm not a member of this "church", hell, they're not even christian anymore

Some are, some aren't. Don't be simple.

151 posted on 08/05/2003 5:59:53 PM PDT by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
I think that is great that you have found such a great Church home.......
152 posted on 08/05/2003 5:59:56 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
That's the problem. They can't split. The denomination owns the church building and the cemetary.
153 posted on 08/05/2003 5:59:56 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: JOHANNES801
How central? We were just in State College two weekends ago at PSU - our daughter is doing the college search........
154 posted on 08/05/2003 6:00:54 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Joe Episcopoaleans?
155 posted on 08/05/2003 6:00:56 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: technomage
At the time the Bible was written, lifestyles and civilization were different. In the ;ast 100 years or so, beliefs and civilization in general have changed. Homosexuality has become mainstream and acceptable. There was plenty more, but that is the crux of it.

To me, that is the crux of the entire debate. Is our faith defined by Biblical teaching or is our faith defined by modern culture, which the left claims is more enlightened or evolved than the "old" faith and values. This isn't just about homosexuality, but the very heart of the faith, because the same people who say the Bible can be ignored if it contradicts modern teaching also often believe (if you can get them to admit it) that Jesus is not the son of God but was just a really good guy we can learn a lot from.

156 posted on 08/05/2003 6:01:47 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Iron Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
That's the problem. They can't split. The denomination owns the church building and the cemetary.

Yeah, I'm aware of the financial entaglements. So was the pastor.

We'll have to wait and see.

157 posted on 08/05/2003 6:01:55 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: JOHANNES801
While no doubt it is better to worship with just you wife whom God has given to you than in a house of sinners whos ears itch to hear they are good might it not be good to try and seek out a church community where Gods work is supreme?

I dont tie myself to a denomination, I attended a Naz church for a long time but recently I moved and found a Baptist church where sin is not tolerated because its suddenly popular..

158 posted on 08/05/2003 6:02:42 PM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
The same justification is used to kill the unborn. There is a special place in hell for one Father Drinan of my Roman Catholic Church.
159 posted on 08/05/2003 6:03:08 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: tinamina; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; ...
The only real difference between the Anglican and Roman Churches is that Anglicans believe marriage is for mutual joy instead of procreation and the priests can marry.

How wrong you are.

The Roman Catholic Church does NOT approve the ordination of "active" homosexuals to the priesthood. The church has consistently taught that homosexuality is a disordered state. ALL catholic priests must abide by a vow of celibacy. Those homosexuals who infiltrated the church did so through concealment of their SSAD.

"In recent years, various questions relating to homosexuality have been addressed with some frequency by Pope John Paul II and by the relevant Dicasteries of the Holy See.1 Homosexuality is a troubling moral and social phenomenon, even in those countries where it does not present significant legal issues. It gives rise to greater concern in those countries that have granted — or intend to grant — legal recognition to homosexual unions, which may include the possibility of adopting children. The present Considerations do not contain new doctrinal elements; they seek rather to reiterate the essential points on this question and provide arguments drawn from reason which could be used by Bishops in preparing more specific interventions, appropriate to the different situations throughout the world, aimed at protecting and promoting the dignity of marriage, the foundation of the family, and the stability of society, of which this institution is a constitutive element. The present Considerations are also intended to give direction to Catholic politicians by indicating the approaches to proposed legislation in this area which would be consistent with Christian conscience.2 Since this question relates to the natural moral law, the arguments that follow are addressed not only to those who believe in Christ, but to all persons committed to promoting and defending the common good of society."

CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING PROPOSALS TO GIVE LEGAL RECOGNITION TO UNIONS BETWEEN HOMOSEXUAL PERSONS

160 posted on 08/05/2003 6:04:15 PM PDT by NYer (Laudate Dominum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 501-504 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson