[eno_]

AQ previously experimented with improvised explosives, like peroxide-acetone bombs and killed a Japanese passenger on an airliner over the Pacific with such a a bomb.

Then we caught the shoe bomber.

In this case, a bomb would have ejected debris far from the main crash site, which is what incontrovertably happened here. So a bomb is one way to explain what happened. A shoot-down would also explain it.

But there is no possible way that just flying the plane into the ground would have resulted in small debris, including human remains, miles from the main crash site.

[sinkspur]

But there is no possible way that just flying the plane into the ground would have resulted in small debris, including human remains, miles from the main crash site.

There were no human remains found, miles from the crash site.

There were few human remains found at the crash site.

Where are you getting this stuff? Conspiracynuts.com?

[steve-b]

There was nothing found at a distance from the crash site that is not perfectly consistent with 1)partial breakdown of structural integrity caused by extreme maneuvers (that's techie for "the plane was gyrating out of control and a few bits sheared off) and 2)normal dispersal from the crash.