Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evangelicals poised to take over the Church
The Telegraph ^ | August 25, 2003 | Jonathan Petre

Posted on 08/24/2003 7:47:01 PM PDT by Mr. Mulliner

Evangelicals poised to take over the Church


By Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent
(Filed: 25/08/2003)

Evangelicals, dismissed as a vociferous minority by senior liberals during the Jeffrey John affair, are now poised to take over the Church of England.

A new study suggests that, if current trends continue, evangelicals will make up more than half of all Sunday church worshippers in 10 years' time, up from about a third now.

As they grow quickly, Liberals and Anglo-Catholics continue to decline, says Dr Peter Brierley, a former government statistician who heads Christian Research.

Moreover, all but a tiny proportion of the new breed of evangelicals will be theologically conservative, viewing sex outside marriage, including homosexuality, as outlawed by Scripture.

According to the new analysis, they are consolidating their grip on the Church's income, contributing a significant amount of money to church funds.

Also, half of all ordinands training to be the next generation of clergy are attending evangelical colleges.

The combined effect could be to provide the evangelical wing of the Church with an unprecedented power base as long as their numbers are reflected in the membership of the General Synod and the Church's leadership in future years.

Dr Brierley's projections are expected to alarm liberals, who have portrayed them as fringe fundamentalists whose influence is out of proportion to their numbers. His analysis indicates that, based on several national surveys by Christian Research, about 35 per cent of churchgoers in 1998 were evangelicals and that proportion could rise to half by 2010.

Of this, he estimates, just eight per cent will be "broad" or "liberal" evangelicals, who are relaxed over issues such as homosexuality. The remainder will be mainstream or charismatic hard-liners.

Another survey, detailed in this year's Religious Trends handbook, indicates that the total giving of evangelical churches is already about 40 per cent of the Church's national income.

The latest Church statistics show that for 2001 the total income of parishes was £650 million. Evangelical worshippers put an estimated £250 million of that into the collection plate.

Their financial muscle was demonstrated during the crisis over Canon Jeffrey John, the openly homosexual cleric who was forced by evangelical pressure in June to withdraw as the Bishop of Reading.

Many evangelical parishes, which include most of the largest and wealthiest in the country, were planning to withhold a significant proportion of the quotas they pay to central funds if Canon John had been consecrated.

"These figures show that mainstream evangelicals are a larger group than most others already, and they are still growing," said Dr Brierley. "If these trends continue, they could become the largest group in the Church within a decade."

His findings belie comments by liberals like the Dean of Southwark, the Very Rev Colin Slee, who said in July that Canon John had been forced to stand down by a minority who made "a noise out of all proportion to their size".

The Rev Giles Fraser, the vicar of Putney, admitted that liberals could have underestimated the influence of "fundamentalist" evangelicals, and it was worrying for the future of the Church.

"The truth is that they have learned the techniques of marketing, how to sell something," he said. "It's a very simple message. But it's like selling soap powder. I think that way of simplifying and marketing is verging on idolatory - putting God into a box."

Gordon Lynch, a theologian from Birmingham University, said that Dr Brierley's analysis was too simplistic and did not allow for shades of opinion and people's changing views. He conceded, however, that socially conservative evangelicals were becoming a "considerable influence".

"They represent one of the few groups in society where people who are drawn to that kind of social conservatism can actually find a home," said Dr Lynch.

"Perhaps the Conservative Party used to provide a kind of structure for those people, but it seems to do that less and less now. So there is a danger that the Church does drift towards an increasingly conservative position."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: churchofengland; evangelicals; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Ryle
There are still some Calvinist Anglicans around, though I wouldn't be sure for how much longer. :)

Technically, the articles of religion in the prayer book state Election and predestination as part of the faith.

81 posted on 08/26/2003 4:46:43 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
I am still with the Episcopal church as of this moment.

But I am very strongly considering leaving. That is no light matter, considering that I am a lifelong 48 year member (we're nearly the same age!) and a third generation Episcopalian (if you don't count my ggg grandfather who was born in London and baptized in St. Giles Cripplegate, the church where Milton was buried and Cromwell married. But his children all became Methodists.)

Here's the deal right now. My husband (who is the voice of reason in our marriage - I'm the one who wants to Do It Now) says wait until October, when the orthodox bishops will meet in Plano TX and the Archbishop of Canterbury has called an emergency meeting for the 16th (IIRC). The buzz is that the bishops are going to ask Canterbury to declare the general convention of ECUSA "out of communion" with Canterbury and recognize the orthodox bishops as the "true" Episcopal church. Failing that, the orthodox bishops will ask for a separate province within the U.S. The reason for this is that it will allow the orthodox churches who go with the orthodox bishops to keep their property (there's good legal authority for orthodox DIOCESES to keep their property if they leave as a unit). They may work out something like the PCA/PCUSA split, where churches had one year to decide which way to go and still keep their church buildings, endowments, pensions, etc.

Depending on what happens in October, we will join an orthodox parish approved by Canterbury, a breakaway Anglican parish (of which there are many under various umbrellas), or one of two Catholic parishes here in town. If the Catholics are paying attention and step up their Anglican Use Rite recruitment, we will have yet another option.

Not only my husband but also our local orthodox parishes are counseling patience and caution. I'm trying! But one thing's for sure -- we are GONE from our current parish. The rector was intellectually dishonest and condescending in his defense of General Convention's decision - so he's lost us for good. He just doesn't know it yet (he probably will get the message when we revoke our pledge.)

82 posted on 08/26/2003 4:55:44 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Spirited
"The lost of the house of Israel were the 10 missing tribes which comprised the House of Israel, descendants of Joseph and of 8 of the other half brothers of Joseph. "

There are no 10 "lost tribes" of Israel.

...at least not in the sense usually meant. The 10 Northern Tribes went into the Assyrian exile in the 700's BC, where they lived until modern times. In the 1950's, hundreds of thousands of Jews, descended from these tribes and mixed with the other tribes, fled to Israel amid the Arab anti-Israel hysteria that exploded in 1948.

They are "lost" only in the sense that due to breaks in recorded geneologies, they are not able to trace their line back to any specific tribe. The only Jews who can trace their line back are some of the tribe of Levi (the priestly tribe). Jews named "Cohen, Levi, Levy, Levinthal, Gershin, Gershwin, Gerson," etc. are of the priestly tribe. By this reckoning, the tribes of Judah and Benjamin are also "lost" as it is not possible for any Jew today to trace a patrilonial or matrilineal back to these tribes either. The geneologies have been lost.

83 posted on 08/26/2003 4:56:20 PM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
Sorry, Ignore my other thread with questions. I feel the same as your husband about waiting a bit but even so I cannot ignore that 2/3 of the representative voted to override and ignore scripture without any attempt to justify it.

I cannot help but conclude that the governing of our church in all other matters can be anything but corrupt, scripturally speaking.

The thing that keeps me there is I can still help teach others in my local church. For example, just this past week the sunday school teachers met. One of them expressed a desire to bring up that other non christian religions were just as good and valid as ours. I responded that if I were asked to do that I would have a tough time explaining to the children why Jesus had to die on the cross. I think my comment made a light go on in her and others mind. If I leave it could affect those who stay.

84 posted on 08/26/2003 4:56:27 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
See my post 76 above re the XXXIX Articles.
85 posted on 08/26/2003 4:56:46 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Yeah, that's the problem isn't it - the ones who get left behind.

I would stay and fight, but I have two children and do not want them brought up in that atmosphere of "anything goes".

86 posted on 08/26/2003 5:00:33 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
Oh, gosh, and one of our local judges had so much fun proving that the Scots were one of the Ten Lost Tribes!

Williams v. State, 126 Ga. App. 350, n.4:

n4 As this opinion began with a Hebrew word and ends on a reference to Scotland, it should be noted this is not inappropriate because many historians have traced the Scythians or Scuthae, who populated Scotland, to be descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. Time magazine issue of August 31, 1953; "The Ten Lost Tribes -- Facts and Fictions" -- H. Sol Clark, LX The New Age 621.

Judge Clark is Jewish himself, BTW. He is famous for his discursory footnotes which usually have little if anything to do with the case. It lightens the reading for judges and lawyers, though.

87 posted on 08/26/2003 5:04:12 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
He just doesn't know it yet (he probably will get the message when we revoke our pledge.)

I'm on vestry and was the SR Warden for the 3 prior years. Our prior minister was female and I was SR warden, treas etc for her so I don't consider myself a total literalist but this recent action goes beyond my ability to rationalize.

Our current priest seems upset and is mostly concerned that he will be forced to do gay marriages, a line that he won't cross (but pensions and family obligations could affect him I'm sure) . Our Bishop is a cheerleader whose justificaton is "The Church has spoken". (Like the body can speak for the head ? )

If nothing changes my wife and I are considering becoming members of a local evangelical free church and continue to periodocically attend our old church as missionaries.

88 posted on 08/26/2003 5:06:38 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
I would stay and fight, but I have two children and do not want them brought up in that atmosphere of "anything goes".

Our daughter is in her SR year and has asked that we not change until she goes to college. Its a valid request. Our next child is 13 and he has just enough time to get some solid relationships for he reaches the drifting age. Our youngest is 8 and has enough chrasma to start his own church.

89 posted on 08/26/2003 5:10:46 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Yeah, our bishop is a cheerleader too (Alexander, Diocese of Atlanta). I assume your man is Smith?
90 posted on 08/26/2003 5:22:05 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
My girl (15) is most concerned about (1) will she have to take confirmation class over again and (2) can she still be an altar server. Many of her friends have already left the church (this rector has other problems besides being a liberal - he's relatively new and he's alienated a lot of people already), and she has close friendships in her new school and with school friends from her former school (attached to the church). My boy is 12 and impatient with church - I think a change of scene would do him good.

I haven't opened negotiations with anybody yet, but those will be among the questions I ask. If we cross the Tiber, I hope we can persuade the parish priest to let her do adult RCIA rather than confirmation because she would be so much older than the other confirmands. One of the Catholic parishes we have our eye on does allow female altar servers - the other is a Latin Mass parish and does not. She excels at it - quiet, reverent, efficient - and she just got promoted to second server (inside the rail).

91 posted on 08/26/2003 5:29:24 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
Thanks for your insight. It must seem like the end of the world for high church aristocrats used to running the show to see the low church common folk taking over. :)
92 posted on 08/26/2003 5:30:58 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Iron Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Well, since the former high church aristocrats haven't run the show since the 2nd world war . . . it's the broad church "latitudinarians" who are shocked to see the evangelists coming out on top.

The broad churchmen have compromised everything away incrementally - in England as well as in America - so they shouldn't be surprised that the evangelists are stepping up to the plate . . .

93 posted on 08/26/2003 5:44:42 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
I assume your man is Smith?

Yes. My wife and I have attended several ordinations as well as his. The interesting thing is we had bad feeling's about him without knowing his theology.

94 posted on 08/27/2003 4:55:16 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Well, I gotta say he LOOKS relatively harmless, although kinda crunchy-nuts-and-granola at first glance.

Look what we have to put up with:

Pic is from a greenie rally sponsored by the usual gang of idiot radical priests. If you can stand it, look at the slide show. It's like a rogue's gallery of everything you don't like about the Episcopal Church.

95 posted on 08/27/2003 5:22:47 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Oops - I was so underwhelmed by that photo of our bishop I forgot to put the link to the slide show in.

Here it is.

96 posted on 08/27/2003 5:24:29 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
although kinda crunchy-nuts-and-granola at first glance

Your insightfull.

97 posted on 08/27/2003 6:05:39 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Hey, in 48 years I've seen a LOT of Episcopal clerics go by . . . not to mention all the comments in passing by dad, mom, and Episcopalian grandmama (a sharp tongued lady if ever there was one!) :-D BTW, that's a particularly unflattering photo of our bishop.

And what is it with ALL these Episcopal priests suddenly popping out in BEARDS? They were all clean shaven except for the "Father Strum-a-Tune" types until about 5 years ago. Now the BISHOPS are sprouting facial fungus?

I don't like this. It may influence my husband to shave, and I LIKE his beard!

98 posted on 08/27/2003 6:59:21 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
scripture proves your assumption that local churchs without central authority won't be in conflict is wrong.

What I said was "many of these controversies would cease to exsist."

There will be conflict within local churches. The Bible also addresses how these controversies are to be handled.

Take the example of gay bishop in the Episcopal church. If a local church apponted this man as bishop it would not effect the other local churches. As it is now it becomes a problem for all Episcopal churches under that central authority.

99 posted on 08/27/2003 5:07:37 PM PDT by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: KeyWest
Worst is the local assembly with no outside checks, as is the case with some churches. Then you can get the Jim Jones mindset and drift dangerously from Christ into pastor worship.

No outside checks? That is why there is a plurality of elders/bishops in the local church so no one man can corrupt it. If there are not at least two men within the local congregation qualified to be elders then the local church will appoint no elsers until such a time the two are found to be qualified. This is the way it is handled where I attend.

Even in the time of Peter and Paul, they were like a governing body that instructed the local churches- as all the Epistles show. So a truly independent church is actually not biblical.

Peter and Paul as well as the other inspired men who gave us the scriptures that we have today are not the same as the governing bodies we see in denominations today.

100 posted on 08/27/2003 5:24:42 PM PDT by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson