Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC- Recall election to be delayed
Pete Williams MSNBC ^ | Pete Williams

Posted on 09/15/2003 10:18:32 AM PDT by Ragirl

California Appeals Court - Recall should be blocked!!!

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2003election; 9thcircuit; 9thcircuitcourt; circus; circustent; davisrecalleelection; democrap; dirtytricks; election2003; floriduhagain; graydavis; impeachthe9th; outofcontrol; recall; thefixisin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 801-811 next last
To: Peach
they might if looked at as violating the people's right to petition.
181 posted on 09/15/2003 10:53:19 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece
I don't disagree with you - only repeating what Rush says.

He reminded us about the New Jersey election when Torrecelli stepped down. USSC declined to take the case because it was a state's issue. I don't see how this California recall case is different.

I have no clue...just repeating what Rush thinks about this matter.
182 posted on 09/15/2003 10:53:23 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
giving drivers' licenses to Illegal Aliens. They can only lose more with this stunt.

Speaking of SB60 illegal alien licenses, if we can get enough signatures for a referendum this fall, the referendum will appear on the March 2004 ballot. When it's on the ballot, people won't forget that the democrats in the legislature passed and Davis signed the bill. The SB60 referendum will energize the anti-Davis anti-Bustamante crowd.

That is, unless the SCotUS intervenes and the recall special election is rescheduled for this November.

If the election is postponed until March, will Kevin Shelley allow more people sign up to be candidates?

183 posted on 09/15/2003 10:53:44 AM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
No matter what the outcome this buys time for the thug Davis.....it also buys time to expose Arnold for the unprincipled cretin that he is!!!!!!!!!!
184 posted on 09/15/2003 10:53:47 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MatthewViti
"Four legs good, two legs bad!" has been replaced. The new mantra is "Tom CAN"T win, a vote for Tom is a vote for Bustamove!"

But I fear I may be slightly off topic. :-)

Hb
185 posted on 09/15/2003 10:53:48 AM PDT by Hoverbug (whadda ya mean, "we don't get parachutes"!?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ssdb
I suppose we all owe white supremacists an apology.

ROFL! And now I want to know where we Jews are secretly running everything, because I am NOT getting the invitations!!

186 posted on 09/15/2003 10:53:57 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
The ACLU argued that blacks and Hispanics are not as smart as regular white folk.

The Court agreed.

Just out of this world. . . Sometimes I feel like I'm living in a parallel universe

187 posted on 09/15/2003 10:54:04 AM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Thanks for the info; someone e-mail Rush!
188 posted on 09/15/2003 10:54:06 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece

BINGO!

good point.
189 posted on 09/15/2003 10:54:06 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
that... was wierd, and unsettling.
190 posted on 09/15/2003 10:54:07 AM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: tellw
Pregerson is the worst of the three, and that is not saying anything good for the other two!! This cannot stand!!
191 posted on 09/15/2003 10:54:12 AM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Good point.
192 posted on 09/15/2003 10:54:23 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (You may disagree with me, but I will fight for your right to be in error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Wouldn't it make sense to vote Davis out of office on the same voting machines that voted him in?!?
193 posted on 09/15/2003 10:54:43 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
discrimination against minorities

Now, the 9th circus court is aiming to get the illegal vote from the new driver licenses on Jan 1st which will allow moter-voter additions to the Dimocrat party.

Are illegal aliens an oppressed minority?

194 posted on 09/15/2003 10:54:47 AM PDT by flamefront (To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Texagirl4W
I could not standa to watch clinton doing what he was doing and using those blacks yesterday.... i turned my t.v. off! Could not stand to see his stupid remarks and black nosing.... it was typical clinton behavior.
195 posted on 09/15/2003 10:54:52 AM PDT by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
By March over 70% of CA drivers will have been presented with triple car tax bills; over 50% of Californians will have paid them and be looking rebates. In March there will be a referendum measure on the ballot overturning drivers licenses for illegal aliens. There will be even more angry voters drawn to the polls by then.

Recall of Davis= Car Tax Rebate$ will be a real simple concept for voters.

196 posted on 09/15/2003 10:55:21 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Por La Raza Mierda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Fox: 9th circuit based part of its opinion on the world's view of our election, NOT on U.S. election law.

That HAS to be humor. TELL ME that you're joking!!!

197 posted on 09/15/2003 10:55:44 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I am so disappointed.....Gallagher had a real shot at being Gov.

A vote for Gallagher was a vote for Gary Coleman. Vote for Mary Carey.

198 posted on 09/15/2003 10:56:05 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Impeach the judges of the Ninth Circus Court of Appeals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
In my honest opinion, I think the 9th Circuit ruling is consistent with Bush v Gore and should be upheld if the SCOTUS applies that same rationale. Moreover, I think that the SCOTUS will simply affirm in any case just because they won't want to revisit the issues of Bush v Gore [which they'll have to, in order to overturn].

That being said, the guidance of Bush v Gore that you cannot have voters subjected to differing standards has been unevenly applied by lower courts, to say the very least. Furthermore, many states still have disparate voting systems statewide, and so that's an additional caveat.

It's really up in the air what the SCOTUS might do. It's conceivable that the SCOTUS will take the case and extend the stay indefinitely, even if it rules after Oct 7 [thus allowing this recall to proceed]. It's also conceivable that the Supreme Court will not extend the stay, even if they do take up the case [thus postponing the recall to March].

If I had to guess, they will decline review, but that's a very low confidence conjecture. The case law pursuant Bush v Gore is simply to novel and undeveloped to guess with any great deal of certainty..

199 posted on 09/15/2003 10:56:06 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Supreme Court Justice Kennedy can issue a stay.....and then the SCOTUS has 48 hrs. to say whether they will hear it or not.

OR.....the Calif SCOTUS can be appealed to...the entire 35 judges who would hold a telephone hearing.

This, according to Judge Napalitano on FNC.
200 posted on 09/15/2003 10:56:15 AM PDT by justshe ("Do you trust a Democrat to protect America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 801-811 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson