To: BOBTHENAILER
As to the WMD, patience, fool, all in good time. Ha! Thats a joke. How much time? A year? 2 ? 4? - Oh yeah, I forgot. Bush is saving it to humiliate his opponents. The fact is (and it is a fact) there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. President Bush sent our troops into harms way based on faulty information. Men and women died in a cause based on that faulty information and now the American taxpayer is about to pay for the rebuilding of an Islamic state.
Like most sheep who cant (or wont) think for themselves, you cant even present an argument to the facts. You can only insult and point other threads (as if that carries any weight). You dont even have the courage to debate on you own; relying on others to come to your defense.
40 posted on
09/19/2003 8:25:40 PM PDT by
thtr
To: thtr
Asked to name one country they would most like Iraq to model its new government on from five possibilities -- neighboring, Baathist Syria; neighbor and Islamic monarchy Saudi Arabia; neighbor and Islamist republic Iran; Arab lodestar Egypt; or the U.S. --the most popular model by far was the U.S. The U.S. was preferred as a model by 37% of Iraqis selecting from those five -- more than Syria, Iran and Egypt put together. Saudi Arabia was in second place at 28%. Again, there were important demographic splits. Younger adults are especially favorable toward the U.S., and Shiites are more admiring than Sunnis. Interestingly, Iraqi Shiites, coreligionists with Iranians, do not admire Iran's Islamist government; the U.S. is six times as popular with them as a model for governance.Since you won't look it up yourself, lazy a$$hole, here is your answer to our building and Islamic state. As I said, read it and weep.
You can only insult and point other threads (as if that carries any weight). You dont even have the courage to debate on you own; relying on others to come to your defense.
I'll debate your sorry a$$ anyday, anywhere, anytime. The above quote from the article you won't read is defeat number one. As to courage, name the place and time, pal, and I'll be there . I only pinged the others to expose a DU troll, so all could see. I don't need their help with you.
The fact is (and it is a fact) there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Prove it.
42 posted on
09/19/2003 8:48:03 PM PDT by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
To: thtr
If you honestly think it's that easy to find WMD, then you go and volunteer your services and find it.
Oh, and WMD CAN fit in a shoebox.
You know what Ricin is, right?
Well, enough Ricin to kill every man woman and child in NYC can fit in a stride-rite box.
Again, if you think it's SO easy to find WMD, YOU go and look for it yourself.
We'll be watching your progress. Au revoir.
55 posted on
09/20/2003 8:00:29 AM PDT by
Darksheare
(It's all part of a vast Rightwing Tagline Conspiracy.)
To: thtr
O.K. I've go to get in on this... Let's all just take a breath. If SH had no WMD's, why on earth didn't he present proof that he did not have them and avoid the war? Your argument is illogical to me. Please advise...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson