Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BOBTHENAILER
As to the WMD, patience, fool, all in good time.

Ha! That’s a joke. How much time? A year? 2 ? 4? - Oh yeah, I forgot. Bush is saving it to humiliate his opponents. The fact is (and it is a fact) there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. President Bush sent our troops into harms way based on faulty information. Men and women died in a cause based on that faulty information and now the American taxpayer is about to pay for the rebuilding of an Islamic state.

Like most sheep who can’t (or won’t) think for themselves, you can’t even present an argument to the facts. You can only insult and point other threads (as if that carries any weight). You don’t even have the courage to debate on you own; relying on others to come to your defense.

40 posted on 09/19/2003 8:25:40 PM PDT by thtr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: thtr
• Asked to name one country they would most like Iraq to model its new government on from five possibilities -- neighboring, Baathist Syria; neighbor and Islamic monarchy Saudi Arabia; neighbor and Islamist republic Iran; Arab lodestar Egypt; or the U.S. --the most popular model by far was the U.S. The U.S. was preferred as a model by 37% of Iraqis selecting from those five -- more than Syria, Iran and Egypt put together. Saudi Arabia was in second place at 28%. Again, there were important demographic splits. Younger adults are especially favorable toward the U.S., and Shiites are more admiring than Sunnis. Interestingly, Iraqi Shiites, coreligionists with Iranians, do not admire Iran's Islamist government; the U.S. is six times as popular with them as a model for governance.

Since you won't look it up yourself, lazy a$$hole, here is your answer to our building and Islamic state. As I said, read it and weep.

You can only insult and point other threads (as if that carries any weight). You don’t even have the courage to debate on you own; relying on others to come to your defense.

I'll debate your sorry a$$ anyday, anywhere, anytime. The above quote from the article you won't read is defeat number one. As to courage, name the place and time, pal, and I'll be there . I only pinged the others to expose a DU troll, so all could see. I don't need their help with you.

The fact is (and it is a fact) there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Prove it.

42 posted on 09/19/2003 8:48:03 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: thtr
If you honestly think it's that easy to find WMD, then you go and volunteer your services and find it.

Oh, and WMD CAN fit in a shoebox.
You know what Ricin is, right?
Well, enough Ricin to kill every man woman and child in NYC can fit in a stride-rite box.

Again, if you think it's SO easy to find WMD, YOU go and look for it yourself.
We'll be watching your progress. Au revoir.
55 posted on 09/20/2003 8:00:29 AM PDT by Darksheare (It's all part of a vast Rightwing Tagline Conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: thtr
O.K. I've go to get in on this... Let's all just take a breath. If SH had no WMD's, why on earth didn't he present proof that he did not have them and avoid the war? Your argument is illogical to me. Please advise...
56 posted on 09/20/2003 8:19:47 AM PDT by CAfraudPI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson