Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Urges Lawmakers to Pass Medicare Bill
Yahoo news ^ | 9/25/03 | Caren Bohan

Posted on 09/25/2003 4:11:32 PM PDT by RJCogburn

President Bush prodded lawmakers on Thursday to pass a sweeping bill that would offer prescription drug benefits to senior citizens and played down worries about its impact on the federal deficit.

Bush met at the White House with House-Senate negotiators trying to hammer out a bill on the Medicare health program. The meeting came a day after the top two Republican leaders in Congress told the negotiators they need to pick up the pace and finish the bill by Oct. 17.

Bush acknowledged that there remains "a lot of work to get done." But he said, "I believe people know it's possible to get it done."

The legislation, passed in differing versions by the House of Representatives and the Senate last June, carries a price-tag of $400 billion over 10 years.

Asked by a reporter if he had qualms about the bill given the amount of red ink facing the government, Bush replied, "No, I don't."

"I absolutely believe we're doing the right thing," he said.

Taking into account an $87 billion spending plan Bush has proposed for postwar Iraq (news - web sites), next year's budget deficit is already estimated to grow to around $525 billion. The president has come under heavy criticism from Democrats for the deficits.

However, for Bush, whose approval ratings have been dropping in the aftermath of the Iraq war, passage of a Medicare bill would provide him with a chance to make good on a campaign promise and garner a domestic policy victory.

FRESH MOMENTUM

Talks toward a compromise on the Medicare bill have moved slowly over the past few months but picked up momentum this week.

The Senate bill had broad bipartisan support, while the House bill has scant Democratic backing and passed by a one-vote margin.

While both bills expand the role of private insurers and managed care plans, the Senate bill is far more protective of traditional government-run Medicare. The House bill aims to inject much more market competition, which Democrats say is tantamount to privatizing the popular health care program.

Both Bush and Iowa Republican Charles Grassley, an architect of the Senate legislation, described themselves as optimistic for the bill's passage.

But Democratic Rep. John Dingell, who participated in the meeting at the White House, said there would need to be significant changes to the bill to make it palatable to House Democrats whose support he contended was needed to pass final legislation.

"There is sufficient conservative opposition to the legislation (so that) if we are to get a bill, it must be bipartisan in character," Dingell said.

"Failing that, I think it is very doubtful that this opportunity to get prescription pharmaceutical benefits to our senior citizens can be achieved," he added.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: healthcare; medicare; prescriptiondrugs
Typical biased news coverage.....the headline should read something like

"Bush urges lawmakers to markedly increase the deficit and debt just to achieve a political advantage".

1 posted on 09/25/2003 4:11:32 PM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Conservatives should vote NO! There is no crying, no pressing demand for a $400 billion entitlement. Seniors aren't asking for a Canada style health care plan. Let's hope the principled minority in the House shows enough backbone to keep us from being taken down the road to socialism via an installment payment plan.
2 posted on 09/25/2003 4:15:09 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Yesterday my husband and I attended a Heritage Foundation speech. They are a conservative think tank in Washington.

Their primary, most pressing issue right now is to convince the president this bill is a BAD idea. So far, they have not had success.

The speaker, Philip Trulock, gave all the reasons why this is a bad idea - primarily because of the huge financial tax burden this will place on the American public.

Passage of the bill would place millions of seniors at risk of losing their existing employer-provider coverage.

3 posted on 09/25/2003 4:20:21 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Asked by a reporter if he had qualms about the bill given the amount of red ink facing the government, Bush replied, "No, I don't."

Course he's not concerned. He's not going to be billed for his generosity. Us taxpayers on the other hand...

4 posted on 09/25/2003 4:20:38 PM PDT by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
There is no spending program that Bush hasn't endorsed. Especially when his campaign contributors garnish the public largess.
5 posted on 09/25/2003 4:29:44 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
I can certainly understand running up the deficit for national defense matters post 9/11, but this...

If it weren't for the fact that Bush is doing a pretty good job with the terrorists, I would have absolutely nothing good to say about this guy.
6 posted on 09/25/2003 4:34:39 PM PDT by Bud Bundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
I don't understand why so many people on this forum are worried that Bush will lose in '04 - this guy is the best president Democrats ever had. The budget deficit is enormous. Entitlement spending is out of control. Now this President is calling on Congress to massively expand a failed socialistic program that's already on life support: Medicare. Meanwhile, his plan to modestly reform Social Security is dead. FDR and LBJ would be proud.
7 posted on 09/25/2003 10:18:42 PM PDT by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn

8 posted on 09/26/2003 12:58:50 PM PDT by Sparta ("General" Wesley Strangelove "Let me start World War III, vote for me as president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson