The Republican Party's Lack of Commitment To Conservatism

Covenant News ^ | 10/4/03 | Chuck Baldwin

[Skooz]

Interesting how you respond not with anything to back up your easily refutable screeds of reason-defying absurdities, but by requesting that we sell some sacks of manure.

You do not back up your words with facts or data. You do not attempt to refute the arguments which disagree with yours. You do not because you cannot. It's that simple.

You have no argument. You have nothing to back up your ludicrous assertions.

[Skooz]

How about them 5-0 Chiefs?????

Yeah baby! They gave me a real scare there for awhile. Dante pulled their jewels from the fire for the second straight week.

[Skooz]

Please go ahead and rub a few brain cells together and *explain* your comment that being pro-life implies being a Theocrat.

He/She cannot. That's why he/she responds with obscenities and vitriol rather than data or facts.

Typical leftist-type tactic.

[Ranger Drew]

The Constimatooshin Party is an oddball collection of cantankerous cranks, and if you review their platform closely, you'll realize that it is pretty much the official party of those KKK members who can still vote (or have at least had their civil rights restored after felony convictions).

While I am not a member of the Constitution Party,...I also know that your assessment is absolute and unequivical BS! Go and vote for the non-conservative republican you sheep. ...because you and all the other new world order idiots are going to get exactly what you deserve. If you think that you're going to be living in a sovereign country in the next decade or so by voting for the schwarzengropers of the world,...think again.

I choose to fight this usurption of all the conservative "Constitutional" principles I hold dear.

[LPM1888]

Please go ahead and rub a few brain cells together and *explain* your comment that being pro-life implies being a Theocrat.

It's very simple. Subscribing to the Pro-life agenda requires subscribing to your views of Christianity. That's fine and a admirable goal until you want to make it a law. Then you are trying to force your view of religon on the nation as a whole.

Requiring the nation as a whole to follow your religous views is by defintion a Theocracy. That makes you a Theocrat not a Republican.

If required, I will defend to my death your right to have and hold your religous views but I will also defend to my death keeping the American government from becoming a Theocracy.

Now if that qualifies as a disruptor, deal with it.

[WOSG]

I hear your pain. I send money to RNC and NSRC and they support all the incumbents, including the RINOs.

If you want to send money to a conservative up against a RINO, support Toomey: http://www.pattoomey.org/

http://www.pattoomey.org/news_item.asp?pid=52
Thanks to Spectre, we lost on school choice for DC - uggh!

http://www.pattoomey.org/news_item.asp?pid=48
That poll, conducted July 17, 2003, showed that 55 percent of those voters had heard of both Specter and Toomey. Among that group, Toomey received 35 percent, Specter received 34 percent, and 31 percent were undecided. The poll interviewed 400 likely primary voters, and had a margin of error of +/- 4.9 percent.

Toomey is lacking only one thing - money. He will be outspent by spectre by a large margin.

[LPM1888]

See #85.

[Saundra Duffy]

I have had two emails in my little sphere of influence from conservative Republicans who are so disgusted with the CA Republican Party, as soon as they vote YES on the recall and FOR Tom McClintock, they are changing from GOP to Independent - the very next day.

[Skooz]

Post 85 is nothing but more of the same nonsense. If that is your idea of a refutation, you have no argument.

No one wants a "theocracy." But you fervently wish they did so your paranoid ranting would have some merit. But, of course, they don't.

[Skooz]

Subscribing to the Pro-life agenda requires subscribing to your views of Christianity. That's fine and a admirable goal until you want to make it a law. Then you are trying to force your view of religon on the nation as a whole.

Nonsense. My Pro-life views are based entirely on science. It is an irrefutable scientific fact that a fetus is a human being. Therefore, killing the fetus is the killing of a human being. It's that simple.

[NittanyLion]

Nonsense. Killing unborn humans is little different than killing any other human. Even atheists recognize the concept of rights, and are capable of recognizing the idea that human life begins at the moment of conception.

[Skooz]

I'm not buying; means try selling your lies to someone else I'm not buying.

I defy you find one lie in what I have posted. Just one.

[LPM1888]

I already have, its not my problem if you can't understand the obvious.

[Skooz]

Care to point it out?

[LPM1888]

Nonsense. Even you in your post admit there is a difference.

[LPM1888]

I already have.

[Skooz]

No, you haven't.

[LPM1888]

Fanatical Religous Extremist nonsense.

[NittanyLion]

Nonsense. Even you in your post admit there is a difference.

Glad you asked. The only difference is that one's legal and one isn't. Morally/ethically - no difference at all.

Thanks for playing.