Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eucharist for Non-Catholics
Zenit News Agency ^ | August 17, 2004 | Father Edward McNamara

Posted on 08/18/2004 6:45:01 AM PDT by NYer

ROME, AUG. 17, 2004 (Zenit.org).- Answered by Father Edward McNamara, professor of liturgy at the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical University.

Q: I have been a Eucharistic minister to the sick for the past 10 years. I have done this in four different dioceses. I have permission from the local bishop to bring daily Communion to a gravely ill relative. This past Sunday, I met several Episcopalians and Lutherans who really wanted to participate in some type of a service too. My heart went out to them. In all our readings Jesus healed based on a person's faith, not their creed. I have not shared Communion, but my heart says this would be good for the faith of those who are suffering. May the Eucharist be shared among non-Catholic if there is faith in the Real Presence? Must I abide by Church law? -- S.C., Little Rock, Arkansas

A: John Paul II has spoken on the relationship between the Eucharist and ecumenism in his encyclical "Ecclesia de Eucharistia":

"The gift of Christ and his Spirit which we receive in Eucharistic communion superabundantly fulfills the yearning for fraternal unity deeply rooted in the human heart; at the same time it elevates the experience of fraternity already present in our common sharing at the same Eucharistic table to a degree which far surpasses that of the simple human experience of sharing a meal. Through her communion with the body of Christ the Church comes to be ever more profoundly 'in Christ in the nature of a sacrament, that is, a sign and instrument of intimate unity with God and of the unity of the whole human race.'

"The seeds of disunity, which daily experience shows to be so deeply rooted in humanity as a result of sin, are countered by the unifying power of the body of Christ. The Eucharist, precisely by building up the Church, creates human community" (No. 24).

Later, in No. 46 of the encyclical, the Pope reminds us of those rare cases, and under what conditions, non-Catholic Christians may be admitted to the sacraments of the Eucharist, reconciliation and anointing of the sick.

This administration is limited to "Christians who are not in full communion with the Catholic Church but who greatly desire to receive these sacraments, freely request them and manifest the faith which the Catholic Church professes with regard to these sacraments. Conversely, in specific cases and in particular circumstances, Catholics too can request these same sacraments from ministers of Churches in which these sacraments are valid."

It adds: "These conditions, from which no dispensation can be given, must be carefully respected, even though they deal with specific individual cases. That is because the denial of one or more truths of the faith regarding these sacraments and, among these, the truth regarding the need of the ministerial priesthood for their validity, renders the person asking improperly disposed to legitimately receiving them. And the opposite is also true: Catholics may not receive 'communion' in those communities which lack a valid sacrament of orders."

The Holy Father refers to several numbers of the Ecumenical Directory which specify these conditions in more detail, in its chapter on "Sharing Spiritual Activities and Resources."

The general principles involved in this sharing must reflect this double fact:

"1) The real communion in the life of the Spirit which already exists among Christians and is expressed in their prayer and liturgical worship;

"2) The incomplete character of this communion because of differences of faith and understanding which are incompatible with an unrestricted mutual sharing of spiritual endowments."

For these reasons the Church recognizes that "in certain circumstances, by way of exception, and under certain conditions, access to these sacraments may be permitted, or even commended, for Christians of other Churches and ecclesial Communities" (No. 130).

Apart from the case of danger of death, the episcopal conference and the local bishop may specify other grave circumstances in which a Protestant may receive these sacraments although always respecting the conditions outlined above in the Holy Father's encyclical: "that the person be unable to have recourse for the sacrament desired to a minister of his or her own Church or ecclesial Community, ask for the sacrament of his or her own initiative, [and] manifest Catholic faith in this sacrament and be properly disposed" (No. 131).

Therefore in general it is not possible for you to give Communion to Protestants. But if you find one who fulfills the above conditions, you should advise the local pastor so that the person may receive reconciliation and anointing of the sick.

This does not mean that you are completely despoiled of all possibilities of giving spiritual comfort while exercising one of the corporal works of mercy.

Apart from words of encouragement and consolation you could also use some of the spiritual treasury of readings, prayers and intercessions found in the ritual for the care of the sick. Thus you could pray for, and with, these souls in a time of need.


TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Catholic; Current Events; Ecumenism; General Discusssion; History; Mainline Protestant; Ministry/Outreach; Prayer; Religion & Culture; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last
To: rogator
I have seen a Catholic priest at a funeral Mass give Communion to an Episcopalian minister (former Jesuit) in his minister uniform.

In all my life with the exception of one time, I have never heard a priest address the Holy Communion issue at any Marriage or Baptism or Funeral Mass. The one exception was a very orthodox and newly ordained priest in this diocese. So I am not surprised at all at what you say. Most Catholics I know do not agree with the Church's teaching on this issue at all. It's because of the 'left out' issue more than anything real understanding.

41 posted on 08/18/2004 9:58:06 AM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
I'm unsure whether a priest would give the Blessed Sacrament to a dying CATHOLIC baby. Do parents in this awful circumstance ask for communion for infants? From a Catholic perspective, after baptism, there would be little need for anything else.

Certainly such a thing is quite rare, and I was only asked once for such a thing, but even so, no one was asking for communion for the dying infant; it was for the other members of the family. I had the sense that the motivation for the request was because of a desire of the family members to feel "as one" with the baby.

It's been my experience that in such situations as death - and especially from those present who are not dying - almost anything might be requested. That's not to say that it should be granted; only that at such emotional times almost anything can "come up".

42 posted on 08/18/2004 10:02:40 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason; american colleen

Speaking of mother-in-laws, whenever I find myself going to a RC mass, I find it amusing that my mother-in-law can't stand it if I take communion. She gives me that angry and proud, "I am not good enough" look, yet her sister, a nun, BEGS me to take communion. Go figure.


43 posted on 08/18/2004 10:06:45 AM PDT by lupie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lupie
Well lupie, I would say both of those ladies are wrong in what they say and what they do.

Just out of curiousity, if you are not a Catholic I presume you do not believe in the Catholic understanding of the Eucharist. Why do you receive Communion?

44 posted on 08/18/2004 10:12:12 AM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: american colleen

It really doesn't matter to me whether one of them or both is wrong, I just find it amusing.

The reasons I would take communion in an RC church are the same that I would in any other church. What someone else does or does not believe does not really affect my trust in the Lord. As it shouldn't. (Although I do notice that people have freaked out when I say "thank you" after receiving the wafer).


45 posted on 08/18/2004 10:22:20 AM PDT by lupie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Dear Religion Moderator,

"That's not to say that it should be granted; only that at such emotional times almost anything can 'come up'."

Hmm... I'm sure you're right. I don't have much experience being nearby when folks are dying.

As my mother lay dying last year, we were concerned to make sure she received last rites from her priest, and when it was clear she had died, we read prayers for the dead at her body. I wouldn't know to do something else.


sitetest


46 posted on 08/18/2004 10:25:28 AM PDT by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: american colleen

'I know the ELCA only has communion every month or so... not sure about the Missouri synod group.'

Communion frequency is a congregational/tradition choice. Some have communion weekly others every other week and every fifthe Sunday in a month.

LCMS: the body and blood of Christ in with and under the bread and wine.


47 posted on 08/18/2004 10:26:47 AM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop
Preface: I am a non-Catholic in an interfaith marriage with a Catholic. I was married in the Catholic Church. My daughter was baptized in the Catholic Church.

The refusal of the Eucharist to baptized Christians who have no wish to abandon the faith of their fathers and adopt Catholicism is one of the reasons I would never seriously consider conversion. It is an overt statement that non-Catholics are not sufficiently Christian to receive the sacrament, and I consider it to be an insult not only to me personally but also to my parents, and their parents. The very idea that I can only become sufficiently Christian by acknowledging error where my faith differs from Catholic teaching is something that I find fundamentally offensive, and I would never willingly join an organization that promulgates such a view.

48 posted on 08/18/2004 10:33:16 AM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rogator

The Church profoundly disagrees with your comments re: to whom the rules apply. Receipt of the Eucharist in violation of the rules is a mortal sin, according to the RCC. I've had the discussion many times, and I remain flabbergasted that a Church would tell me that I endanger my mortal soul by participation in a sacrament. But that is their position.


49 posted on 08/18/2004 10:38:02 AM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

I would imagine that at the moment of death, any priest/minister would pray for the soul of the dying and not worry about legalisms.


50 posted on 08/18/2004 10:53:14 AM PDT by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
The refusal of the Eucharist to baptized Christians who have no wish to abandon the faith of their fathers and adopt Catholicism

Truth is what It is regardless of who held tightly to whatever else in the past.  Why do you wish to receive the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ if you do not believe in Most Holy Communion?  With this question in my mind, your condemnation of the Catholic Church's position ["Catholic teaching is something that I find fundamentally offensive"] does not make sense to me in the least.

FReegards.
51 posted on 08/18/2004 10:55:41 AM PDT by GirlShortstop (« O sublime humility! That the Lord... should humble Himself like this... »)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: lupie
OK, but it seems to me you are being disrespectful to a religion that you don't espouse. I won't get into the theological discussions but it seems to me that if I were attending some kind of worship service (or even for me, an Orthodox Mass) and I didn't belong and I disagreed with their beliefs and I knew they ask that I don't partake in something crucial and sacred for them, then, out of respect, I would remain silent and still.

I'm sure no one 'freak's out' when you say "thank you", but I am sure they are taken aback somewhat. I assume that you know you are supposed to say "Amen" and I wonder why you don't say it? It sounds disrespectful to me that you don't say it if you know you are supposed to say it. OTOH, maybe you are not a hypocrite and you cannot say "Amen" after the priest says "Body of Christ" knowing "Amen" means "So be it" or "Truly".

52 posted on 08/18/2004 11:05:03 AM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Do you believe in the Catholic Church's understanding of the Eucharist? That it is the Real Presence... after being consecrated by a validly ordained priest, the bread literally becomes Jesus Christ.

Just curious.

53 posted on 08/18/2004 11:07:20 AM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop
It doesn't make sense to you because your post espouses exactly the position which is offensive: Catholics follow Truth, and non-Catholic Christians follow something that is not Truth - even if they agree with 99.9% of the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.
54 posted on 08/18/2004 11:23:42 AM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Catholics follow Truth, and non-Catholic Christians follow something that is not Truth

Well what would you expect Catholics to think they follow? And if I belive Catholicism is the Truth then it would follow that non-Catholic Christians do not have the full truth. Period. You have to admit that you must think the same thing about what you follow, else why do you follow it?

- even if they agree with 99.9% of the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.

If you agreed with 99.9% of what the Church teaches, you'd be a Catholic. I think you might be exagerating the numbers somewhat for effect? ;-)

55 posted on 08/18/2004 11:29:31 AM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
I do not view that as a "yes" or "no" question. I also think that question is necessarily bound up with a number of semantic arguments - what, exactly, is the difference between the Catholic view of transubstanitation that allows the physical properties of bread and wine to remain and the Lutheran view that the bread and wine "co-exist" with the blood and body of Christ?

Probably the most clear expression of my view is that espoused by 2nd century Christian writers - that the Eucharist involves both a spiritual and earthly reality. Within the spiritual reality, my answer to your question would be yes. Frankly, I would consider answering yes to that question with regard to earthly reality to be promoting the view that God is engaged in a deception - having one consume blood and flesh that has the taste, smell, texture and chemical composition of wine and bread.

56 posted on 08/18/2004 11:37:48 AM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
"If you agreed with 99.9% of what the Church teaches, you'd be a Catholic."

That is a remarkably egocentric view, and one that perfectly illustrates the disdain regularly expressed by the RCC for the Protestant faiths.

57 posted on 08/18/2004 11:39:10 AM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason
I, too, am a Anglo-Catholic who attends Roman Catholic Mass from time to time. I also go to Confession from time to time at my nearby Catholic church, as my own Anglican parish is distant and makes less provision for this Sacrament.

My doctrinal differences with the Catholic Church are relatively few, mostly centering on ecclesiology. I am a devout believer in the Real Presence, although I decline to speculate as to its nature. I do not reject transubstantiation; I simply do not positively confirm it.

Despite the close ties I feel with my Catholic brothers and sisters, I am not in full communion with that Church, so I would not receive the Body and Blood at a Catholic Mass. In some ways, I'm more "Catholic" in my thought and practice then the average Catholic in the pew, but that doesn't matter.

I am grateful that I can receive the Blessed Sacrament _in extremis_ from a Roman Catholic priest. But for me to willy-nilly declare my "right" to receive is at best a grave discourtesy and, at worst, a damning sin.

I pray that God in his mercy will lead us to true unity in the Faith, but until that time, I will not assume the prerogatives of that unity falsely.

Side note: To be frank, when I do attend the local NO mass, I miss the sense of reverence that pervades my own High Anglican mass. And what did you do with the altar rails?:-)
At least we Anglicans can kneel at the rail and receive on the tongue. I don't think even the most apostate ECUSA parish has done away with this.
58 posted on 08/18/2004 11:41:58 AM PDT by good_fight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: american colleen
"And if I belive Catholicism is the Truth then it would follow that non-Catholic Christians do not have the full truth. Period. You have to admit that you must think the same thing about what you follow, else why do you follow it?"

No. Again, your Catholic egocentricity is showing. I believe the Bible is the Truth. I do not believe that the Fourth Lateran Council had any monopoly on the Truth. Nor did Martin Luther. Or John Wesley. Or the Southern Baptist Conference. Therefore, where Catholic teaching is Biblical teaching, I can concur that it is the Truth. Where it is a pronouncement of the view of a mere man, I am not required to concur. Whether that man is in your Church or mine.

59 posted on 08/18/2004 11:42:27 AM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Within the spiritual reality, my answer to your question would be yes. Frankly, I would consider answering yes to that question with regard to earthly reality to be promoting the view that God is engaged in a deception - having one consume blood and flesh that has the taste, smell, texture and chemical composition of wine and bread.

I don't get you... do you believe that the consecrated Eucharist is the Body and Blood of Christ - or - the Body and Blood of Christ along with bread and wind?

Frankly, I take Him literally... This is My Body... I'm not really sure what else to say to you.

Could you cite which early Christian writers did not believe that the consecrated Eucharist is the Lord?

60 posted on 08/18/2004 11:44:08 AM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson