Posted on 05/04/2005 8:48:33 PM PDT by Akron Al
ping...let's hope Pope Benedict XVI will not be deceived.
Is Bishop Pilla and the Cincinnati Bernardin Bishop going to retire soon- they must be.
I think Pilla has 1 1/2 years. Perhaps someone can give us the exact date he turns 75.
If you go here you will see Father Smiga speaking at a Futurechurch event in 2004 - - after Pilla's phony condemnation of Futurechurch.
http://www.futurechurch.org/newsletter/fall04/
Smiga teaches at St. Mary's Semianry in the Diocese of Cleveland:
http://www.stmarysem.edu/adjunct_faculty.htm
bump
Bishop Pilla: Nov 12, 2007
Archbishop Pilarczyk: Aug. 12, 2009
Abp Pilarczyk: born Aug 12, 1934. He is getting close to 71 years old and has 4.27 years to go till 75.
What is being done by the laity in Cleveland to get rid of Pilla?
Will upcoming seminary visitations uncover any of this?
Have it so that the very moment they turn 75... KABOOM. This way we wouldn't have to suffer them one minute longer than we are absolutely forced to.
I believe it was Pilarczyk who was tossing around the sadistic idea of not submitting his resignation letter.
Gotta run
Schismatic act. Equivalent to denying papal authority over his see.
That would be the rainbow colored Thomas Gumbleton, the equally if not more repulsive, Bishop of Detroit.
What a merciless thing to do to his diocese. Maybe someone can talk him into starting a line of those designer rainbow stoles he likes to wear as an alternative to going setting this ill-conceived precedent.
I'm SHOCKED!/sarcasm.
A Bishop---LYING???
More paving materials for the roadway...
Thomas Gumbleton is not the Bishop of Detroit. He was named an auxiliary Bishop way back in 1968 at only 38 years old. He was never given his own diocese.
He's not the Bishop. Just a Bishop.
Thanks Al. Nice summary.
As you will recall, as Bishop Pilla's visit to Rome approached, there was a very concerted effort to bring attention to the scandals in the Diocese of Cleveland.
Clearly, the bishop realized he would be asked about Futurechurch and attempted to do some damage control with this statement.
Once he got back from Rome, it immediately became a dead letter.
But as noted above, everyone on every side of the issue was suprised and stunned when this "new edict" was issued. For the diocese to claim that they had been telling people the same thing "for the past several years" is ridiculous.
As the Plain Dealer noted in April of 2004:
"The group had operated unrestricted in the Cleveland diocese for more than a decade. But the truce ended unexpectedly April 1 after Pilla issued an edict to all pastors."
Obviously, the truce began again once Pilla returned from Rome. And today it is business as usual for Futurechurch in the Diocese of Cleveland.
Thanks very much for the heads-up, Al.
(Off topic somewhat: interesting blog on the Neo-Catechumenical cultists ... http://amywelborn.typepad.com/openbook/2005/01/the_way.html)
At the parish council meeting Tuesday night, Fr. Pissant (as I now call him) gave us the Save-A-Soul Mission hard sell. Yes, I felt like I'd been set up. There were other less than satisfactory developments as well. I am working on a letter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.