Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Many evangelicals unwittingly live as feminists, Moore says
Florida Baptist Witness ^ | Published December 8, 2005 | Russell D. Moore

Posted on 12/31/2005 5:12:35 AM PST by Popman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: netmilsmom
In today's 'femmi' world of evangelicalism....it is ALWAYS...'Evangelicals and Catholics TOGETHER'....etc.....!!!

visit any theological SEMANARY.....

/Narnia pagan nonsense

21 posted on 12/31/2005 5:58:38 AM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I think he was saying in a nice gibberish sort of way, that "many conservative and evangelical households" are just like the heathens down the street.


22 posted on 12/31/2005 6:00:39 AM PST by Popman (In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: maestro

Is your cat using your computer this morning?


23 posted on 12/31/2005 6:00:49 AM PST by Tax-chick (I am just not sure how to get from here to where we want to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
There is an element of men in the church whom I refer to as the "Taliban wing" of the Christian church.

These men have twisted Scripture into something alien; something that in their own minds gives them license to lord over women their superior physical strength and in the process, terrorize their families into cowering, fearful, unhappy victims. These are men who generally have very low self-esteem, have issues with women that have not been resolved through therapy, and derive enormous satisfaction from behaving like power nazis in their own homes- the only place where the behavior is tolerated.

These are men who are living in sin- they are not living according to the Scriptural mandates for the roles of men and women in marriage, but according to their own fantasies of the "lowly" status of women, and their own perceived superiority.

Nowhere in Scripture can any validation of this behavior be found. I hope that your friend's situation can be made better at some point. She may have to leave the jerk.

24 posted on 12/31/2005 6:01:31 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: maestro

OH! I get it!


25 posted on 12/31/2005 6:03:27 AM PST by netmilsmom (God blessed me with a wonderful husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Could be. I think he makes some reasonable points, and that, often, "mutual submission, negotiation and consensus" is code for "the man doesn't want to be bothered with the minutiae of life, like the credit card bill and the children's education."


26 posted on 12/31/2005 6:03:45 AM PST by Tax-chick (I am just not sure how to get from here to where we want to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Popman
The rest of Ephesians about covers your concerns

Right, but it seems to contradict Moore.

27 posted on 12/31/2005 6:14:38 AM PST by Shalom Israel (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Shalom Israel
Right, but it seems to contradict Moore.

Where exactly in the article does Moore contradict the principles of Ephesians?

28 posted on 12/31/2005 6:21:09 AM PST by Popman (In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
"mutual submission, negotiation and consensus"

Bear in mind, Moore is using these terms in the context of the way feminist use them.

These terms has semantic meaning to the radical feminist that are far different than the avg person.............which he should have pointed out.

29 posted on 12/31/2005 6:25:24 AM PST by Popman (In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Popman
I quoted it in #8 already. Moore describes "negotiation, musual submission and consensus" as "feminism", meaning that it's not the proper way to operate in a family.
30 posted on 12/31/2005 6:28:02 AM PST by Shalom Israel (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
I hope that your friend's situation can be made better at some point. She may have to leave the jerk.

It is being made better. She served him with divorce papers. He skipped the meeting with the judge and left the state with one of the kids.

And the judge threw the book at him.

31 posted on 12/31/2005 7:14:47 AM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Popman

That's a good point. Too much negotiation and consensus is just a waste of time, in my opinion. Many issues aren't worth the effort. If everything is being negotiated and compromised, that could indicate a power struggle in the marriage, which is certainly not the Biblical model.

I tend to disagree with using "feminism" as an explanation, though, because that suggests that men have no opportunity to take responsibility for their families, when they do. While it's true that some men are abusive and use religion as their excuse, and some are (in my opinion) overcontrolling out of genuinely loving motives, there are many who have made the choice not to make an effort outside their jobs and hobbies.


32 posted on 12/31/2005 8:00:56 AM PST by Tax-chick (I am just not sure how to get from here to where we want to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Popman
Its also the name of a book, "The Feminization of Christianity". A must read.
33 posted on 12/31/2005 8:39:28 AM PST by bella1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

"These men have twisted Scripture into something alien; something that in their own minds gives them license to lord over women their superior physical strength and in the process, terrorize their families into cowering, fearful, unhappy victims. These are men who generally have very low self-esteem, have issues with women that have not been resolved through therapy, and derive enormous satisfaction from behaving like power nazis in their own homes- the only place where the behavior is tolerated.

These are men who are living in sin- they are not living according to the Scriptural mandates for the roles of men and women in marriage, but according to their own fantasies of the "lowly" status of women, and their own perceived superiority."

Perversely just like Muslims.


34 posted on 01/04/2006 9:25:15 AM PST by Niuhuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Popman
Instead, Moore said, a biblical view of male headship and gender roles actually protect against spousal and child abuse because it does not posit male privilege, but instead demands male responsibility.

Something that needs to be kept front-and-center, IMO. The same passage which calls on wives to submit to their husbands also calls on husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the Church. My wife is called upon to submit to my headship. I'm called upon to be crucified for her.

"Could we please re-negotiate this package, honey? I'm not sure this trade is as fair as I thought it'd be ..."

35 posted on 01/04/2006 9:48:34 AM PST by Campion ("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson