Just because Fellay is insane (psychopathologically delusional) does not mean you would be able to indentify the insanity. (Have you ever worked with an individual with a fixed delusion?) Many individuals who are quite mad fool a lot of people.
The sspx and its supporters throw around "calumny" to try and silence opponents of schism. They never identify as calumniators those, like lefevbre, who said Pope John Paul was an AntiChrist, intent on destroying tradition etc etc.
Fellay has described as evil the Msss apporoved by the Catholic Church. Trent anathematised anyone who engages in such action. Trent also condemned Bishops who invade and minsiter in the Jurisdiction of legitimate Bishops. Does that stop the 'trad" Fellay? Nope. Presumably, Fellay was learnt these things a long time ago. I think "insanity" the only logical defense for him. It is either that or he is anathema. Which position is more charitable?
Fellay teaches an Ecumenical Council is heretical. That is rank heresy. Is it more charitable to call him a heretic or to think him insane and incapable of making sound judgements?
Fellay teaches all Jews are condemned. Is it more charitable to think he is mentally competent when he teaches such an abominable and hateful antisemitic heresy or is it more charitable to think him insane and not culpable?
I think you have reasoned your way into a dilemma by adopting the sole defensive tactic of the schism supporter, which is to accuse the opponent of the schism of being a big blue meanine who is committing a mortal sin.
Isn't it funny how the defenders of the schism can hold their tongues for 30 years while their leaders enage in all manner of heresies, hatreds, calumnies, campaigns, distortions, inanities, and lies directly targeted at the Holy Father, the Second Vatican Council, and the Normative Mass and the SOLE target of the label "calumny" is used against a Faithful Catholic who effectively counters their lies and heresies.
Save it, brother. It ain't a tactic which will work on me. I KNOW the schism. I KNOW its heresies. I KNOW its defensive tactics. I KNOW its lies. I KNOW its antisemitic hatred. I KNOW schism is evil. I KNOW the schism has a double standard. I KNOW the schism engages in actions it condemns others for.
Take care of your own, soul, brother. The Baltimore Catechism warns (#367) you must take care of your own life and not endanger it. You are endangering it in the schism.
#374 and 375 of the Baltimore Catechism refers to the sspx's theft of what rightfully belongs to the church. You support this theft. That makes YOU guilty.
Please read #379. Y'all, obviously, do not evcn know the definition of calumny. That aside, your silence about the sins of the schism makes YOU guilty of the sin of co-operation in their evil.
NOTHING I have said about fellay is a calumny. It is just the OPPOSITE. I have posted what he teaches you folks. I have come-up with an idea which ABSOLVES him (potentially) of the evil he promotes.
If y'all knew what you were talking about you'd praise me
CALUMNY
(Latin: calvor, to use artifice, deception)
Any deception of another, especially in judicial matters, commonly used to mean unjust damaging of another's character by imputing to him something of which he is not guilty. It is an act which varies in sinfulness according to the gravity of the fault or crime imputed and the damage done. It calls for retraction and for reparation of the damage done, provided this had been foreseen. In canon law, the oath taken to attest that the litigation on both sides is in good faith is called juramentum calumnire (oath disclaiming calumny).
* ONCE MORE SO THAT MAYBE Y'ALL WILL LEARN IT I am profferring an idea which ABSOLVES Fellay. I am NOT accusing him of being GUILTY as one is NOT responsible for one's DELUSIONS
If ya'll can't get something this easy correct, maybe y'all think twice before judging the Pope, the Council, and the Mass as heretical and, by your support of the schism, co-operating in that evil.
LOL, you are making a claim of mental illness. Either you are qualified to do so and have His Excellency as a patient and therefore ought not comment, or you have no reason to claim mental illness other than as a detraction. To play word games as you do detracts even further from botth your arguments and the comity between Catholics that we all ought to seek. You hold yourself out as the voice of Rome and then go beyond anything Rome ever has by name-calling. Sad, very very sad.