Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Alamo-Girl
But the life of faith does not require tangible visibility

Thanks for the ping to this article. For a short while this morning, I looked for an excellent post made by Alamo Girl on another thread--now 5,000+ posts long. I could not find it, but I remember that the post was about how Catholics emphasize the physical/tangible and how non-Catholic Christians emphasize the spiritual.

In a society that needs constant sensual stimulation, is it any wonder that people would desire physical/tangible in worship? God knows the difficulty of loving an unseen spiritual being. In fact, we cannot love him unless he first loves us. And after that first love, we need the Holy Spirit to work in us through his word that we may continue to love what only can be seen by faith.

138 posted on 05/03/2008 7:10:18 AM PDT by suzyjaruki (Why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: suzyjaruki
Thank you oh so very much for sharing your insights, dear suzyjaruki!

Is this post 1345 the one you were seeking?

140 posted on 05/03/2008 7:33:21 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: suzyjaruki
I found another place whether we were discussing the difference in perspective. Perhaps this one is it?
142 posted on 05/03/2008 8:20:12 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: suzyjaruki
I remember that the post was about how Catholics emphasize the physical/tangible and how non-Catholic Christians emphasize the spiritual.

In a society that needs constant sensual stimulation, is it any wonder that people would desire physical/tangible in worship? God knows the difficulty of loving an unseen spiritual being.

Isn't it funny that God bothered to become incarnate and live in the flesh among us? It's just so terribly physical/tangible of Him.

148 posted on 05/03/2008 8:38:46 AM PDT by TradicalRC ("...just not yet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: suzyjaruki
...the post was about how Catholics emphasize the physical/tangible and how non-Catholic Christians emphasize the spiritual.

That post was wrong.

157 posted on 05/03/2008 10:14:59 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: suzyjaruki

By virtue of God becoming incarnate, the spiritual became tangible. A separation of the two would be a false dichotomy and furthermore a grave misunderstanding of Catholic teaching. The emphasis is not on the physical - the emphasis is on synthesis of the two.


170 posted on 05/03/2008 12:01:14 PM PDT by mike182d ("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: suzyjaruki
In a society that needs constant sensual stimulation, is it any wonder that people would desire physical/tangible in worship? God knows the difficulty of loving an unseen spiritual being. In fact, we cannot love him unless he first loves us. And after that first love, we need the Holy Spirit to work in us through his word that we may continue to love what only can be seen by faith.

Beautifully and Scripturally articulated, Suzy.

AMEN!

177 posted on 05/03/2008 12:57:27 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson