[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

You have given some fine lectures on "falsifiability", like this one in post 342:

You are simply ignorant about the scientific method. Simply provide a falsifiable hypothesis to test. In other words show how Creationism can be falsified and then it will count as a credible theory, for which evidence can be shown for and against. A theory that can't be falsified, like string theory, is worthless, at best a pleasant diversion.

But as we shall see, your notion of falsification is a special one: it only applies to the other guy you may be talking to.

The Sun is only 2.1 degrees behind strictly in relationship to an observer on the earth, in a two body model.

How would you falsify this hypothesis?

[mrjesse]

You have given some fine lectures on "falsifiability", like this one in post 342:

You are simply ignorant about the scientific method. Simply provide a falsifiable hypothesis to test. In other words show how Creationism can be falsified and then it will count as a credible theory, for which evidence can be shown for and against. A theory that can't be falsified, like string theory, is worthless, at best a pleasant diversion.

But as we shall see, your notion of falsification is a special one: it only applies to the other guy you may be talking to.

The Sun is only 2.1 degrees behind strictly in relationship to an observer on the earth, in a two body model.

How would you falsify this hypothesis?

Great point! I wanna know that too!

Thanks,

-Jesse