Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holiday Hysteria (a Christian defense of Halloween)
Catholic Exchange ^ | October 31, 2008 | Rod Bennett

Posted on 10/31/2008 9:49:19 AM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-165 next last
To: demshateGod

Oh, you couldn’t be more wrong (or judgmental) if you tried. We’re simply freed from the un-Biblical concepts of sola scriptura and private interpretation, and have chosen not to see bogeymen where they don’t exist.

By legalism, I mean the evangelical tendency to add extra-Biblical proscriptions against harmless activities.

Visit my parish just one Sunday. Nearly every Sunday, we hear sermons on living in accordance with the will of Christ, including: instruction on chastity, generosity/serving the less fortunate, the incompatibility of abortion and ESCR with Christianity, how to care for our families in the manner described in the Bible, how to focus our attention on worship every moment of every day, the importance of accepting Christ as our personal Lord and savior, how to stand up for Christian values regardless of the values pushed by secular culture, repentance and turning away from evil, humility (and you’re accusing me of the opposite, even though I’ve not exalted myself in any way in this thread), the need for prayer before action (and not as a last resort), and so on.

And you know what? I heard the same sermons for nearly a decade as an evangelical. So you’re a bit off-base in your analysis.


81 posted on 10/31/2008 1:25:08 PM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

No problem... I knew exactly what you meant!


82 posted on 10/31/2008 1:26:03 PM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius
Let me clean that up a bit: "What do you mean by “strictly on our own terms.”

We have to engage the world in debate where we find it. A festival originally celebrated by pagans has been reinterpreted in the context of Christianity, and is now being transformed into a deracinated fancy-dress party with occult overtones. Christians need to confront this head-on, which means remembering from where the occult overtones came, which was a perfectly understandable and pro-Christian association of fall with the death of nature into winter, prefiguring Christ's death and rebirth in the Spring.

This is the first problem with "Harvest festival" substitutes some evangelicals offer--the point of the holiday is not to congratulate ourselves on our good farming, it's to note that growth is ending, which in the past meant, for instance, the slaughter of all the yearlings not considered to be good breedstock.

Fall is shot through with intimations of death, and the Christian needs to speak directly to that. Trying to change the subject is a dodge. Hallowe'en is associated with death, and with our fears about those things which bring death.

It is a common folkway for tribes to act out their fears, which in northern Europe involve either surrogate demons or counter-demons, dressed to frighten away the evil spirits. Now, most Christians are prepared to concede the real existence of evil spirits, so, perhaps some might object under the principle of "speak of the devil and he will appear," but this isn't strictly scriptural is it?

Once we understand why the costumes exist--to protect the village from those things represented by the costumes, we have to be much more sympathetic to the folk drama being acted out. Trick-or-treating is not really understood then as a sacrifice to evil spirits, but rather a gift made to those who dare to confront the evil spirits.

Hallowe'en is too important to be left to children and materialists who want to sell them candy and costumes.
83 posted on 10/31/2008 1:26:43 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: djrakowski

No, I’m a Baptist, which was the name given us by the Pope because we believed in scriptural Baptism of believers by immersion. We were persecuted by the Pope and the Protestants for that belief.


84 posted on 10/31/2008 1:27:29 PM PDT by demshateGod (the GOP is dead to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny; djrakowski; Petronski

>>If Catholics are Christians why do you make such a big deal about your Catholicism? As thankful as you are for being “led by the Spirit there” and all...

Take for example my identity is in Christ, my Baptism is in Christ, Ive died in Christ, etc. The Catholic church cant do any of those things for you...whats your hang up with Christianity?<<

We got a live one here!!!!


85 posted on 10/31/2008 1:29:57 PM PDT by netmilsmom ( Obama And Osama both have friends who bombed the Pentagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod; Petronski; NYer; Titanites

If you’re a Baptist (and I was a Baptist), then you’re a Protestant. There’s no way for you to avoid that appellation.

I hope you’re not getting your view of Christian history from “The Trail of Blood.” It would explain a lot about your posts, though.


86 posted on 10/31/2008 1:31:07 PM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

Actually, Baptists were first called “anabaptists” because they wouldn’t baptise children. Baptists changed it to “Baptist,” to emphasise that they did indeed want to baptise people, but only after they had come to a satisfactory understanding why.

The Pope had nothing to do with either name, which were both handed to him post-facto from northern Europe.


87 posted on 10/31/2008 1:32:02 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Based on your “ping,” it looks like we’re thinking the same thing ;)

God bless ya, my FRiend. My 6-year old is dressed as a bumblebee for Halloween and I need to go home and take some pictures before she heads out.


88 posted on 10/31/2008 1:33:06 PM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
If Catholics are Christians why do you make such a big deal about your Catholicism?

Setting aside the ignorance of the "If?" question, Christ founded the Catholic Church. That is why it is a big deal: it's His Church.

whats your hang up with Christianity?

O good grief.

When did you stop beating your wife?

89 posted on 10/31/2008 1:33:13 PM PDT by Petronski (Please pray for the success of McCain and Palin. Every day, whenever you pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: djrakowski

The hubby wore a leather jacket and “stick on” eyebrow piercing to work! I’ve got one black haired goth and a Wizard with a third eye.

My friend says, we go out for Halloween to show the Devil that he is not going to break our fun filled traditions, in fear of him!!

We shake our fists and go to church the next day!


90 posted on 10/31/2008 1:36:12 PM PDT by netmilsmom ( Obama And Osama both have friends who bombed the Pentagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: djrakowski

Actually, no I’m not a protestant. I’ve read Trail of Blood and think it’s probably generally true, but more than that I’ve read the Bible. Jesus said he’d preserve His church. If there were no churches paralleling the Catholic domination than that makes Jesus a liar.


91 posted on 10/31/2008 1:38:38 PM PDT by demshateGod (the GOP is dead to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

“Christ founded the Catholic Church.”

Christ did not establish a catholic church much less the Catholic Church.


92 posted on 10/31/2008 1:40:37 PM PDT by demshateGod (the GOP is dead to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; wideawake
We celebrate some Jewish Holidays. In fact, back home we had a family that would come to our Christmas celebration and would send us Latkas for Hanukkah.

The first time the youngest daughter walked into my sister's house for Christmas, she said, “It's just like the Soap Operas!”

Those were the days......

All well and good, but missing my point.

Historically the Catholic Church abolished Jewish holidays (since they had been "fulfilled" and were no longer necessary) but pursued the opposite tactic, inculturation, with regard to pagan holidays.

I don't want to get in a big argument but please try to think of it this way: the Catholic Church made lupercalia (valentine's day), pomonalia/samhain (halloween), and s*t*rnalia/sol invictus (chr*stmas) into into chr*stian holidays. It did not do this with Ro'sh HaShanah, the anniversary of the day Adam and Eve were created.

I'm asking a very simple question: why were pagan and Jewish holidays treated so differently by the ancient church? Why were pagan holidays chr*stianized while Jewish ones were considered obsolete and often proscribed as "judaizing?"

I am afraid this whole question ties in with an issue that Catholics don't seem to be able to understand. Anyone who can defend pagan holidays can defend Jewish ones. Anyone who can say "faith without works is dead" can acknowledge the validity of Torah observance.

Catholics/Orthodox/etc. simply do not seem to understand the simple Biblical sentimentalism of radical Protestants--that if there are valid rituals or holidays they should be Biblical Jewish ones, not extra-Biblical pagan ones; and if the Jewish rituals and holidays of the Bible are of no more use, then neither is any other kind of ritual or holiday.

In defending Catholic rituals and holidays Catholics must resort to using the same apologetics Judaism uses with regard to chr*stianity as a whole. In attacking Jewish rituals and holidays as obsolete they engage in an early (and inconsistent) form of Protestant antinomianism.

Does no one here at least understand the point I'm trying to make?

93 posted on 10/31/2008 1:41:10 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Shofekh dam ha'adam, ba'adam damo yishafekh; ki betzelem 'Eloqim `asah 'et-ha'adam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

I understand your point, especially for Jewish Christians, from the point of view of cultural continuity, but it was decided at the Council of Jerusalem that gentiles would not be bound by the Torah in any way.

That being the case, mandating the observance of any of the Torah festivals would be wrong.

That said, I think it’s always a mistake to miss the opportunity for a good party. Again, Purim should be much more widely celebrated.


94 posted on 10/31/2008 1:44:51 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius

Hamantaschen for everybody!


95 posted on 10/31/2008 1:45:21 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
"Jesus said he’d preserve His church. If there were no churches paralleling the Catholic domination than that makes Jesus a liar."

You REALLY need to sit down and examine the implications of that statement, given the possibility of your own error in interpreting scripture, coupled with the absolute absence of historical evidence of a continuous "parallel church" tradition.

96 posted on 10/31/2008 1:56:34 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Peter Horry

There’s also warning on gas pumps not to use your cellphone while your pumping or you’ll start a fire even though it’s been proven that it’s the getting in and out of your car that crates the static buildup that makes the spark that makes the fire, not your phone. There’s good money keeping people scared, for one thing it helps make sure people buy pre-packaged high profit margin candy rather than cheaper stuff like fruit. It also helps keep distrust high, media and government both like it when neighbors don’t trust each other, keeps them from talking and finding out they don’t need the media or government.


97 posted on 10/31/2008 1:59:55 PM PDT by dilvish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Honestly, my FRiend, I'm not defending a pagan holiday as we have never celebrated it this way. To us, it's all Hallows Eve, the day before All Saints Day. It comes down to intent.

But more than that, it's an American tradition. Trick or Treating and carving pumpkins. That's American. And that's why we do it.

And I like Jewish Holidays! Get me back to Fairlawn to Lou and Hy's for the end of Rosh Hashana and a nice knish. I'll be one happy woman.

98 posted on 10/31/2008 2:09:04 PM PDT by netmilsmom ( Obama And Osama both have friends who bombed the Pentagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
While I do appreciate C.S Lewis, what about the scriptures? As far as I know and read in them, Christ's death and blood made me clean. Purgatory is a fictional place used by the “Church” to keep them in bondage. Im sorry about you and the Episcopalians...and you can keep the whole universal church thing.
99 posted on 10/31/2008 2:12:49 PM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; NYer
"So my original understanding is confirmed: Catholicism/chr*stianity replaces Biblical Jewish holidays and adapts non-Biblical pagan ones."

Yes. I find life with fewer metaphors to be very relieving. My family does not miss the holidays of our former religion at all and really does feel better without them.

Isaiah 43:11

Not so long ago, there was some Protestant resistance in America against this holiday's festivities/observances. My path of study and prayer was much like that of the early Puritans, but I went that step further.


100 posted on 10/31/2008 2:14:51 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson