Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holiday Hysteria (a Christian defense of Halloween)
Catholic Exchange ^ | October 31, 2008 | Rod Bennett

Posted on 10/31/2008 9:49:19 AM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-165 next last
To: TheGunny

Being a good neighbour implies sociability, which doesn’t always get to be strictly on our own terms.


61 posted on 10/31/2008 12:31:20 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
H’ween doesnt serve my faith or “religion” what so ever

*****************

I don't believe it serves mine, either. I also think it encourages beliefs that are anti-religion.

62 posted on 10/31/2008 12:32:45 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: djrakowski

If Catholics are Christians why do you make such a big deal about your Catholicism? As thankful as you are for being “led by the Spirit there” and all...

Take for example my identity is in Christ, my Baptism is in Christ, Ive died in Christ, etc. The Catholic church cant do any of those things for you...whats your hang up with Christianity?


63 posted on 10/31/2008 12:34:04 PM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius

I disagree. What do you mean by “strictly on our own terms.”


64 posted on 10/31/2008 12:35:53 PM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny

Nobody made a big deal about Catholicism until the notion was advanced that a Catholic was out-of-bounds for offering a Christian defence of Hallowe’en from a Catholic point of view.


65 posted on 10/31/2008 12:36:28 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
Excellent question - Catholicism is universal Christianity, and it is the Church in which the fullness of Christian truth subsists. I'm free from the pitfalls of private interpretation of scripture, I'm guided by 2000 years of consistent teachings on faith and morals, and most of all, I have the privilege of receiving Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament. Why wouldn't I be thankful for being guided into the fullness of truth? I suspect anyone would be! One who's identity is fully shaped by Catholicism is also fully shaped by Jesus Christ. Thus, when a Catholic Christian identifies himself as a Catholic Christian, and fully accepts what the Church teaches about itself, then that person has identified fully with Christ. I have no hangup with Christianity. I'm a Christian. What's your hangup with Catholics claiming to be Christians?
66 posted on 10/31/2008 12:38:26 PM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: djrakowski

Does your prayer kind of sound like this: I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican.


67 posted on 10/31/2008 12:57:52 PM PDT by demshateGod (the GOP is dead to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
Purgatory didn't worry the early Church Fathers or C.S. Lewis (he believed in it too) and it doesn't worry me. Lewis explains it better than I could:

I believe in Purgatory.

Mind you, the Reformers had good reasons for throwing doubt on the 'Romish doctrine concerning Purgatory' as that Romish doctrine had then become.....

The right view returns magnificently in Newman's DREAM. There, if I remember it rightly, the saved soul, at the very foot of the throne, begs to be taken away and cleansed. It cannot bear for a moment longer 'With its darkness to affront that light'. Religion has claimed Purgatory.

Our souls demand Purgatory, don't they? Would in not break the heart if God said to us, 'It is true, my son, that your breath smells and your rags drip with mud and slime, but we are charitable here and no one will upbraid you with these things, nor draw away from you. Enter into the joy'? Should we not reply, 'With submission, sir, and if there is no objection, I'd rather be cleaned first.' 'It may hurt, you know' - 'Even so, sir.'

I assume that the process of purification will normally involve suffering. Partly from tradition; partly because most real good that has been done me in this life has involved it. But I don't think the suffering is the purpose of the purgation. I can well believe that people neither much worse nor much better than I will suffer less than I or more. . . . The treatment given will be the one required, whether it hurts little or much.

My favorite image on this matter comes from the dentist's chair. I hope that when the tooth of life is drawn and I am 'coming round',' a voice will say, 'Rinse your mouth out with this.' This will be Purgatory. The rinsing may take longer than I can now imagine. The taste of this may be more fiery and astringent than my present sensibility could endure. But . . . it will [not] be disgusting and unhallowed."

- C.S.Lewis, Letters To Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer, chapter 20

Viewed in this way, and not with some of the excesses that had grown up around the doctrine (thanks to Sister Mary Attila, Aunt Drusilla and their ilk, who meant well but were sometimes a little fuzzy on theology), it makes perfect sense.

I and my family are converts to Catholicism from the (shudder) Episcopal Church. I studied things pretty thoroughly before we converted.

68 posted on 10/31/2008 1:00:05 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse - TTGS Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

No, it’s more like this: “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.”

I was extolling the virtues of my CHURCH... not mySELF.

And sometimes my prayer sounds like this:

“Our father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name
thy kingdom come, thy will be done,
on earth as it is in heaven
give us this day our daily bread,
and forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those
who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.”


69 posted on 10/31/2008 1:01:35 PM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Lots of evangelicals love C.S. Lewis, so I wonder why more of them haven’t raised objections about his views on the subject of purgatory.


70 posted on 10/31/2008 1:03:15 PM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: djrakowski
A lot of times folks just read about C.S. Lewis and don't actually read what he wrote.

He also believed in the Real Presence.

Unusual for a man raised in Protestant Belfast . . . !

But you have to remember what his day job was -- professor of medieval and Renaissance literature. As his fellow countryman (and candidate for sainthood) John Cardinal Newman said, "to be deep in history is to become Catholic."

71 posted on 10/31/2008 1:07:26 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse - TTGS Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

A lot of my closest evangelical friends (well, former closest friends - they dropped me like a hot potato when I converted) read nothing more of Lewis than Mere Christianity and the Chronicles of Narnia. But there’s so much more to read than those two, so it’s likely that they haven’t encountered his sacramental views.

“to be deep in history is to become Catholic” -> Amen, sister! I’ve also seen it quoted as this: “To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant.” But the effect is the same nonetheless.


72 posted on 10/31/2008 1:10:34 PM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: djrakowski

“’To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant.’ But the effect is the same nonetheless.”

It’s vastly different. I’m not Catholic and I’m not protestant. Maybe Lewis meant all non-protestants were Catholics but if he did, he was flat wrong, and was reading the wrong history books.


73 posted on 10/31/2008 1:15:30 PM PDT by demshateGod (the GOP is dead to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: djrakowski

“......and forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those
who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.
And thank you that I’m not a legalist, as one of those who read their Bible and sincerely attempt to apply to their life.”


74 posted on 10/31/2008 1:17:52 PM PDT by demshateGod (the GOP is dead to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod; AnAmericanMother

If you’re not Catholic, and you’re not Protestant, does that make you Orthodox? I suspect the manner in which I quoted it leaves that possibility as well.

BTW, the quote was John Henry Cardinal Newman, not Lewis.


75 posted on 10/31/2008 1:17:52 PM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: djrakowski
Your version of the quote is correct. I should always verify my references!
76 posted on 10/31/2008 1:18:03 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse - TTGS Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: NYer; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment

Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

77 posted on 10/31/2008 1:19:17 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

It was Newman, not Lewis. And I think where he was going with that is that a close reading of the history of the Church and a history of the Reformation is very enlightening.


78 posted on 10/31/2008 1:19:32 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse - TTGS Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny
"What do you mean by “strictly on our own terms.”

We have to engage the world in debate where we find it. An festival originally celebrated by pagans has been reinterpreted in the context of Christianity, and is now being transformed into a deracinated fancy-dress party with occult overtones. Christians need to confront this head-on, which means remembering from where the occult overtones came, which was a perfectly understandable and pro-Christian association of fall with the death of nature into winter, prefiguring Christ's death and rebirth in the Spring. This is the first problem with "Harvest festival" substitutes some evangelicals offer--the point of the holiday is not to congratulate ourselves on our good farming, it's to note that growth is ending, which in the past meant, for instance, the slaughter of all the yearlings not considered to be good breedstock. Fall is shot through with intimations of death, and the Christian needs to speak directly to that. Trying to change the subject is a dodge. Hallowe'en is associated with death, and with our fears about things which bring death. It is a common folkway for tribes to act out their fears, which in northern Europe involve either surrogate demons or counter-demons, dressed to frighten away the evil spirits. Now, most Christians are prepared to conceded the real existence of evil spirits, so, perhaps some might object under the principle of "speak of the devil and he will appear," but this isn't strictly scriptural is it? Once we understand why the costumes exist--to protect the village from those things represented by the costumes, we have to be much more sympathetic to the folk drama being acted out. Trick-or-treating is not really understood then as a sacrifice to evil spirits, but rather a gift made to those who dare to confront the evil spirits. Hallowe'en is too important to be left to children and materialists who want to sell them candy and costumes.
79 posted on 10/31/2008 1:19:58 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
>>It’s a shame Catholics haven’t been so historically broad-minded about the celebration of Jewish holidays as they have been the pagan ones.<<

We celebrate some Jewish Holidays.
In fact, back home we had a family that would come to our Christmas celebration and would send us Latkas for Hanukkah.

The first time the youngest daughter walked into my sister's house for Christmas, she said, “It's just like the Soap Operas!”

Those were the days......

80 posted on 10/31/2008 1:24:15 PM PDT by netmilsmom ( Obama And Osama both have friends who bombed the Pentagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson