Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin's Pro-Life Failin'? What a long, strange "Tripp" it's been
Fighting Irish Thomas ^ | 12-30-08 | Tom O'Toole

Posted on 12/31/2008 9:57:41 AM PST by mlizzy

Levi Johnston and Bristol Palin

Prince Chunk

Reading the announcement yesterday of the Dec. 27th birth of Sarah Palin's 18-year-old unwed daughter Bristol's baby, it dredged up memories of the many triumphs but more failings of the McCain/Palin campaign. Alas, the fact that the story of the coming-into-the-world of 7 lb., 7 oz. Tripp Easton Mitchell Johnston (the rad-dad's last name) was a "People exclusive!" did not make me particularly happy, as the online version of the blessed event juxtaposed the picture of the allegedly joyful couple with that of a woefully overweight 44 lb. cat. But, while Bristol and boyfriend Levi now understand that if you're gonna take People's 5 or 6 figure payoffs, you will have to share your fifteen minutes of fame with the likes of "Prince Chunk," hopefully Sarah learned if you're gonna let feminists, pseudo-Christians and the MSM dictate what you're gonna say, your pro-life message is going to be confused, then buried.

When Sarah Palin was first announced as John McCain's running mate, I'll admit I was pleasantly surprised. Her introduction speech was short but electric, and her Republican convention talk was no letdown. Sure, it was short on pro-life and probably catered too much to the Hillary Clinton feminists, but her down-home humor and candor certainly made up for that. And who could be more visibly pro-life than a mother of five who recently decided to keep her Down syndrome (pronounced "mistake" in Obama-ese) baby despite her busy schedule as governor?

The soon-to-be-leaked-by-Democrats "scandal" that her unwed daughter was pregnant AND keeping her baby backfired on Barack and only made Palin's platform stronger. But Obama, the "Man of Lies and Smiles" was not done yet, and his underlings' further attacks, coupled with her own team's unclarity, proved her undoing.

For although Sarah Palin did go on to make some powerful pro-life speeches, such as her Johnstown, PA "Every innocent life matters" manifesto, these proved to be the equivalent of Rick Warren's pro-family talks to his own congregation, and were of course widely ignored by the mainstream media, except to twist a phrase or two out of context. And then, when she did use the MSM, she chose Obama minions such as Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric, who not only undercut her "Hockey Mom" strengths, but like the hero of Capra's classic movie Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, made her look silly. But unlike the Jimmy Stewart character, Sarah did not have the last say, for when she did have the chance to hammer Obama or Biden on abortion or other life issues, she rarely did, and by making the economy—not morality—the main issue, the Democrats of Death won handily.

But how could this be so? Certainly, if you were running against Hitler, you wouldn't leave the Concentration Camp issue alone, but keep pounding away until everyone realized that "relocation" was merely another word for "extermination." No doubt part of the problem was McCain himself; just as his own lack of a consistent home church or denomination probably led him to back off the relevant Jeremiah Wright question, his failure to grasp all the aspects (such as embryonic stem cell research) of the pro-life question probably made him tell Palin to focus on other issues besides abortion—except when, such as at Johnstown, she was preaching to the choir. And yet, as strong as Palin's pro-life stance was, I wonder if Sarah, too, did not have one small deficiency (perhaps due to her own church hopping?) on this issue, and this little chink in this "Christian Chick's" armor proved fatal.

Although she was baptized a Catholic, Palin has not only left this church but also switched Protestant denominations several times, including the Assemblies of God and, more recently, a non-denom bible church. Since these churches do not have a definite stance on the issue, one would have to conclude that this contributed to Palin's in-some-ways-confusing position on contraception. While originally stating she wanted abstinence-only sex education taught in public schools, she later changed (or as they say in politics "modified") her position, stating, "I'm pro-contraception, and I think those who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues." On the other hand, her original house of worship, the Roman Catholic Church, has a very decisive teaching on this question, being against it (as the Church is with abortion) in all instances, even inside the marriage. Just as James taught, "Then desire conceives and brings forth sin, and when sin reaches maturity it gives birth to death" (Jas 1:15), so Pope Paul predicted (in the landmark 1968 encyclical Humanae Vitae) that the contraceptive mentality would not only lead to increased divorce but wholesale legalized abortion, two prophecies that have sadly come to pass. As stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, "Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love... The difference, both anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle ... involves in the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of human sexuality." In other words, since contraceptive sex cannot by its very nature be an act of total self giving, it will always be in some respects selfish; not being open to the procreative aspect of the act will eventually destroy the unitive aspect as well. Thus, while I agree with Sarah Palin (and disagree with the Democrats that her daughter's decision to have relations outside of marriage was dreadfully wrong, and her choice to deliver the baby was wonderfully right, I do not believe Bristol and hopefully soon-to-be-her-husband Levi Johnston's decision not to use contraception was an additional sin.

I most certainly wish Bristol and the little Tripp-ster well, and, despite their dubious windfall from the country's leading rag-mag, it sounds like her fiance, who dropped out of high school and whose Myspace recently read, "I'm a ... redneck" and "I don't want kids," will need my prayers too. As for Sarah, besides being a devoted wife and mom, she is definitely an astute politician, and I'm sure she in another four years will be completely caught up on foreign and domestic policy if she decides to make another national run. Still, I hope Sarah comes to complete terms with that one questionable position in her otherwise stellar pro-life profile, if not for the nation's sake, at least for her daughter's. As Humanae Vitae states, "Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law." Thus, while there are many things Sarah could do to help make her daughter's thus-far shaky union sacred, contraception isn't one of them. Because Sarah Palin is no longer Catholic, I realize (unless someone sends her this column!) she will probably not find her answer to the contraception question in Humanae Vitae—but I know she definitely won't find it in People.


TOPICS: Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bristolpalin; catholic; palin; palinfamily; prolife; sarah; tabloid; trippjohnston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: GovernmentShrinker

Please reflect on this simple fact: You don’t know anything about these people except what you read in the papers.


21 posted on 12/31/2008 11:05:52 AM PST by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Indeed. There are lots of former Catholics who have joined these churches for various reasons, including the vapid liberalism of many faithless priests whose tinkering with the liturgy and explaining away of dogma eroded the faith of many honest people and caused them to flee to churches that offered them some security of heart. What we see happening to the Episcopal Church might have happened to the Catholic Church but for the grace of God which has brought us thirty years of strong papal leadership.


22 posted on 12/31/2008 11:13:49 AM PST by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
including the Assemblies of God and, more recently, a non-denom bible church. Since these churches do not have a definite stance on the issue

Bull! The Assemblies of God has a very definitive stance on abortion. Abortion. The Assemblies of God views the practice of abortion as an evil that has been inflicted upon millions of innocent babies and that will threaten millions more in the years to come. Abortion is a morally unacceptable alternative for birth control, population control, sex selection, and elimination of the physically and mentally handicapped. Certain parts of the world are already experiencing serious population imbalances as a result of the systematic abortion of female babies. The advocacy and practice of so-called partial birth abortion of babies is particularly heinous.

+++

NOT a definitive stance on "abortion" ... a definitive stance on "birth control" ...
23 posted on 12/31/2008 11:36:21 AM PST by mlizzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: trisham
"Valuing" children doesn't mean just getting them born and claiming to "value" them while ignoring their needs. Bristol is perfectly healthy and normal, but her parents didn't value her enough to put aside some of their own pursuits to focus on raising her, preferring to run off on political campaigns and to the oil fields while she was searching for affection in the only place she could find it, at drunken parties with other teens whose parents are ignoring them (like Levi, whose mother was busy with her drug-dealing enterprise). Many conservatives talked about Sarah as if she's some sort of saint because she chose to give birth to a DS baby, ignoring the fact that she doesn't let ANY of her children interfere with her outside pursuits of personal satisfaction.

My point about the crack whores is that they don't let the babies they give birth to interfere with their lifestyle either, and that's why they don't care whether the babies are damaged by the drugs or have DS or any other disability. They rarely abort for any reason, and that's not evidence that they "value" the lives of their babies. Regardless of whether their baby is normal or disabled, they'll keep right on smoking crack, sleeping with crack dealers, and leaving their helpless little children in filthy homes with no food and the violent boyfriend-of-the-week. And already having one or two or three babies that they can't/won't care for decently, doesn't strike them as any reason to avoid having more -- they won't stop sleeping around and won't bother to use contraceptives.

24 posted on 12/31/2008 11:37:16 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Contraception is not pro-life. Abortion is not pro-life.

Getting pregnant prior to marriage is not such a bad thing at all. Valuing life must begin at the beginning, and it seems that Palin understands that. The fact that her teenage daughter chose to marry and give birth to her baby tells me that Palin has succeeded as a mother; her daughter knows the right decision to make regarding life, regardless of the criticism she has received. That takes courage and integrity.

Palin may not be a saint, but it is clear that she is doing something very right.

25 posted on 12/31/2008 11:48:59 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Sarah has many admirable qualities, and I’d be happy to support her run for office again. But what most of what you’ve written is true - it seems like maybe her two eldest were lacking in parental attention.

I think most people on this site would be horrified if a liberal woman’s kids were involved in such circumstances. But since it’s St. Sarah, we’re supposed to overlook any of her possible lapses in judgment.


26 posted on 12/31/2008 11:49:51 AM PST by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Next time you decide to repeat your Keith Olbermann talking points on Sarah Palin, know something about ‘time management”

Suffering from Venus envy?

Check out this website

www.2012DraftSarahCommittee.com


27 posted on 12/31/2008 11:53:26 AM PST by CARepublicans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Do not use potty language - or references to potty language - on the Religion Forum.


28 posted on 12/31/2008 12:05:37 PM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: alaskamomma; GovernmentShrinker
Double ugh!

Where do such as GovernmentShrinker come from? Oh, Pennsylvania I see, one of the Blue states no doubt. The blue meanness seems to be rubbing off on you GovernmentShrinker. It must be a fearful thing to be so terribly righteous that you can't see the log in your own eye. You, sir or madam, are just asking for mega slap down from the what comes around goes around fairy. But I do hope that doesn't happen as you seem to be unable to deal with anything other than a life of perfection.

29 posted on 12/31/2008 12:21:40 PM PST by pepperdog (The world has gone crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Bristol has not yet wed.


30 posted on 12/31/2008 12:25:45 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Getting pregnant prior to marriage is not such a bad thing at all.

Say what?

The fact that her teenage daughter chose to marry and give birth to her baby tells me that Palin has succeeded as a mother; her daughter knows the right decision to make regarding life, regardless of the criticism she has received.

And how to make lousy decisions from a moral standpoint. Had Bristol Palin done something like finish high school, get a college degree, get married, settle down, and then get pregnant, I suppose you'd say her mother had gone wrong with her somewhere? </sarcasm>

31 posted on 12/31/2008 12:32:36 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kalee

I didn’t realize that. I hope that she and the father choose to marry soon.


32 posted on 12/31/2008 12:34:17 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Getting pregnant prior to marriage is not the end of the world. Having an abortion is.


33 posted on 12/31/2008 12:35:25 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: trisham

I agree.


34 posted on 12/31/2008 12:39:29 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer
People are not going to see the truth about abortion until we find a truly charismatic and powerful rhetorician to enchant them with a call to righteousness.

+++

Yes! You see the Truth. That's why I voted for Huckabee, by far the most articulate candidate on the Life question.

You make writing worthwhile! So don't give up, but keep fighting the Good Fight! -- Fighting Irish Thomas (a.k.a. Tom O'Toole, the author!)


35 posted on 12/31/2008 1:47:26 PM PST by fightingirishthomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Getting pregnant prior to marriage is not the end of the world. Having an abortion is.

Neither is the end of the world. And neither can possibly be considered a good thing.

36 posted on 12/31/2008 2:19:31 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

last week we celebrated the birth of a child born to an unwed young woman.

not a comparable birth, I know, but Mary was betrothed, not married, by God’s choice!


37 posted on 12/31/2008 2:51:37 PM PST by elpadre (nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

So they neglected their sacred duty; they’ll have to answer to God for giving away our country to the Evil One.


38 posted on 12/31/2008 2:58:00 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

A priest friend from Alaska and I were visiting and he happened to mention that the message Governor Palin sent at the dedication of a monument to the unborn blew all others out of the water, including the bishop’s. He wondered if it had to do with her being a pregnant mother, at the time. He said it was very beautiful.


39 posted on 12/31/2008 3:02:27 PM PST by mockingbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer

I really don’t know that any person will be able to truly change people’s hearts on this issue. Until the American people turn their hearts toward God and He deals with them personally, I don’t see how we’re going to turn this thing around.


40 posted on 12/31/2008 4:27:09 PM PST by chickpundit (Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson