Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
Indeed. For instance, YEC posters believe their evidence is much more convincing.

I haven't seen a coherent statement of physical history to which all YECs would subscribe. I'm not talking about trivial details. I'm talking about rather large scale phenomena, such as the length of the day intended by Genesis writers, whether the individuals take on the Ark by Noah represented species or families of creatures, whether diseases were specially created or the result of devolution. In short, I see no creationist theory that explains the range of phenomena accounted for by mainstream science.

316 posted on 01/28/2009 10:01:21 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
In short, I see no creationist theory that explains the range of phenomena accounted for by mainstream science.

Case in point, you value the evidence differently.

Neither side is objective. Indeed, no observer "in" space/time can perceive objectively "all that there is" all at once.

321 posted on 01/28/2009 10:07:46 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson