Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: delacoert

I don’t understand the point of this (other than it being flamebait.)

Mormons can believe anything they want. You can’t prove them wrong anymore than you can prove yourself right.


5 posted on 07/19/2009 9:49:17 AM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tzimisce

exactly.


6 posted on 07/19/2009 9:52:03 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Tzimisce
Well, except there are not Quaker like people on the moon, I am pretty sure that part has been disproved.
11 posted on 07/19/2009 10:04:25 AM PDT by svcw (Barry: mentally deficient & narcissistic misogynist megalomaniac psychopath w/ paranoid delusions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Tzimisce

Or any religion for that matter.


28 posted on 07/19/2009 11:25:16 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Tzimisce; svcw; delacoert; All
I don’t understand the point of this (other than it being flamebait.)

Ah, we get it.
#1 Lds publish numerous statements of theological error in a publication (the Examiner).
#2 Delacoert happens to respond to just one of them in this venue.
#3 And yet you somehow are clueless to understanding the point of it, and yet proceed to comment upon it?

Your misassumptions?
#1 That Delacoert was the one initiating this
#2 Attributing false motives to Delacoert, a form of mild slander and "heart-reading" of a stranger (do you read palms, too?)

Finally, if it's in the "Tzimisce bible" -- small "b" 'cause it doesn't resemble the real one -- that anyone who posts disagreements in FreeperLand is motivated only to bait enflamed responses, then how do you explain your posting of a disagreement? (Was that, too motivated only to bait enflamed responses, or do you always let yourself off the hook of your own applied logic?)

Mormons can believe anything they want. You can’t prove them wrong anymore than you can prove yourself right.

More into refuting yourself, eh? If Delacoert can't come to any conclusions of "wrongness" about Mormon error, why are you bothering to attempt to "enlighten" Delacoert about his supposed "error" to even post this thread? (Can you say, "inconsistent?")

Apparently, according to your own standards of philosophical relativism, Delacoert can't be "wrong" in your eyes because Delacoert can also "...believe anything... he want[s] -- and You can’t prove him wrong anymore than you can prove yourself right.

(Ain't it funny how philosophical relativists speak so absolutely authoritian-like?)

BTW, does this statement of absolutism -- that Mormons can never be proved wrong -- apply to all cultists? -- or just merely to fave cultists of yours? For example, does this "religious tolerance" of yours -- of never having proof of "wrongness" -- also apply to Muslim terrorists, too? Or Heaven's Gate cult members pre-mass suicide? Or Jonestownians?

36 posted on 07/19/2009 11:57:24 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson