You wrote:
“It is not my claim but it is the Moravians own claim.”
You’re now saying that these are not your words: “This is laid the groundwork for the resentment that long simmered against the Latin church.” Look at post #51. Are those your words or not?
“You can take it up with them and prove them wrong.”
Again, are these your words or not?: “This is laid the groundwork for the resentment that long simmered against the Latin church.”
Your words or not? It’s a simple question. Really... really...simple.
“You don’t like it that is your problem not mine. It is their folk memory not mine or yours.”
Folk memory? 1) History is not based on “folk memory”. 2) Are these YOUR words or not?: “This is laid the groundwork for the resentment that long simmered against the Latin church.”
“Clearly the seeds of resentment to the Latin church existed on that soil.”
Clearly? According to whom? If it is so clear, wouldn’t you have some evidence of that? Any at all?
“By the way I have to call you on your claim to a PhD - you may have one - but I would like to verify until then your just a guy online.”
No. I say that for two reasons: 1) When you refuse to provide a single scrap of evidence for your own assertions, I certainly owe you NO evidence about my personal accomplishments. 2) When you start claiming your own words are not your own words, then I fail to see why I would owe anything about anything. 3) My professional accomplishments in no way impact the discussion. You say you love history. I KNOW history. Great. Let’s see who is right. You have failed to present any evidence whatsoever to prove your baseless assertion. And you are now claiming your statement was not yours at all. Sorry, buddy, but I owe you NOTHING here.
Again, are these your words?: “This is laid the groundwork for the resentment that long simmered against the Latin church.”