Hmmmmmm.
Plausible.
I think that’s been done a LOT. I think the list of quotes is a big CHUNK of that.
Hasn’t seemed to scratch the surface of the biases against such FACTS.
It seems like the “conspiracy” label is all that’s sufficient to neurtralize thought and fair-mindedness on the topic.
I guess part of me is dubious that the huge amount of work to ‘DISPASSIONATE’ such a huge pile of facts would take to achieve what . . . a HINT of change on the part of the WILLFULLY STUBBORNLY BLIND?
Maybe I’m too pessimistic about it. Maybe I’ve been burned at the stake too much over it.
I’d be VERY interested in END TIMES list members’ thoughts on those issues.
Perhaps it is not so much the ‘meat’ that’s not there, or presented. Perhaps it is truly a case of the subject title needing to be changed in order to get people to look with fresh eyes? The term ‘New World Order’ has been so linked with the ‘conspiracy’ mantle that maybe that is what’s getting in the way???
I don’t have suggestions at the moment on how to counter this, but I’ll think on it for a while and let you know if I have any ideas on how to broach the subject subtly and without perking up the “conspiracy” label so quickly...
I truly do think it’s a case of where the enemy has already framed the issue, and made it’s ‘judgement’ on this topic years ago and hence it’s entered the ‘common knowledge’ area of public discussion AS a ‘conspiracy theory’ to begin with. The fact that more and more things are happening to point out that this is a TRUTH and not a fantasy doesn’t phase most people because they are already blinded by the label that has been with this subject for a good 20 years, at LEAST...
I remember in HS when hearing about this subject for the first time, and it wasn’t hard to believe that a World Government would be an objective, but as a (sort of) liberal at the time it only seemed a natural progression of society, and I didn’t realize the importance of sovereignty and those issues at the time.
Maybe that attitude is also a problem we are dealing with. No-one likes wars, so perhaps the idea of a one world government isn’t as scary to them as it is for us? Perhaps even some conservatives have doubts as to how bad it would really be for our way of life?
Anyway, somehow we have to take hold of this information and present it from a different angle???
I’m on the verge of ‘understanding’ something at the moment in regards to how to repackage this information, but can’t put it into words. It’s like the whole broad subject needs to be rearranged, or something... I’ll post again in response when I unravel the thoughts I’m having trouble expressing at the moment! :)