Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Priests are a gift from the Heart of Christ, Pope Benedict says
CNA ^ | 6/13/2010

Posted on 06/13/2010 12:16:24 PM PDT by markomalley

Vatican City, Jun 13, 2010 / 10:58 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Thousands of pilgrims and faithful gathered at noon Sunday in St. Peter’s Square to pray the Angelus with the Holy Father. Before the prayer, he said that the fruits of the recently ended Year for Priests could never be measured, but are already visible and will continue to be ever more so.

“The priest is a gift from the heart of Christ, a gift for the Church and for the world. From the heart of the Son of God, overflowing with love, all the goods of the Church spring forth,” proclaimed Pope Benedict XVI. “One of those goods is the vocations of those men who, conquered by the Lord Jesus, leave everything behind to dedicate themselves completely to the Christian community, following the example of the Good Shepherd.”

The Holy Father described the priest as having been formed by “the same charity of Christ, that love which compelled him to give his life for his friends and to forgive his enemies.”

“Therefore,” he continued, “priests are the primary builders of the civilization of love.”

Benedict XVI exhorted priests to always seek the intercession of St. John Marie Vianney, whose prayer, the “Act of Love,” was prayed frequently during the Year for Priests, and “continues to fuel our dialogue with God.”

The pontiff also spoke about the close of the Year for Priests, which took place this past week and culminated with the Solemnity of the Sacred Heart of Jesus. He emphasized “the unforgettable days in the presence of more than 15,000 priests from around the world.”

The feast of the Sacred Heart is traditionally a “day of priestly holiness,” but this time it was especially so, Benedict XVI remarked.

Pope Benedict concluded his comments by noting that, in contemplating history, “one observes so many pages of authentic social and spiritual renewal which have been written by the decisive contribution of Catholic priests.” These were inspired “only by their passion for the Gospel and for mankind, for his true civil and religious freedom.”

“So many initiatives that promote the entire human being have begun with the intuition of a priestly heart,” he exclaimed.

The Pope then prayed the Angelus, greeted those present in various languages, and imparted his apostolic blessing.


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: catholic; priests
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,3601,361-1,3801,381-1,400 ... 2,421-2,436 next last
To: Judith Anne; Quix

“Can you name a “doctrine of demons” in the “RCC Catechism”?”

Here’s a start....

http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p122a3p2.htm
The Immaculate Conception
493 The Fathers of the Eastern tradition call the Mother of God “the All-Holy” (Panagia), and celebrate her as “free from any stain of sin, as though fashioned by the Holy Spirit and formed as a new creature”.138 By the grace of God Mary remained free of every personal sin her whole life long.

Mary — “ever-virgin”

Mary’s virginal motherhood in God’s plan

http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p123a9p6.htm#II
II. DEVOTION TO THE BLESSED VIRGIN

971 “All generations will call me blessed”: “The Church’s devotion to the Blessed Virgin is intrinsic to Christian worship.”513 The Church rightly honors “the Blessed Virgin with special devotion. From the most ancient times the Blessed Virgin has been honored with the title of ‘Mother of God,’ to whose protection the faithful fly in all their dangers and needs. . . . This very special devotion . . . differs essentially from the adoration which is given to the incarnate Word and equally to the Father and the Holy Spirit, and greatly fosters this adoration.”514 The liturgical feasts dedicated to the Mother of God and Marian prayer, such as the rosary, an “epitome of the whole Gospel,” express this devotion to the Virgin Mary.515

http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p123a9p3.htm

829 “But while in the most Blessed Virgin the Church has already reached that perfection whereby she exists without spot or wrinkle, the faithful still strive to conquer sin and increase in holiness. And so they turn their eyes to Mary”:306 in her, the Church is already the “all-holy.”

“Outside the Church there is no salvation”

846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers?335 Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.336

***********************************************************************

Doctrines of demons?

Mary was always a virgin. Mary was conceived without sin and remained without sin her entire life. Mary is the reason the church has reached perfection. Salvation is through the Catholic Church.

It doesn’t get much worse than that.


1,361 posted on 06/22/2010 11:01:48 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1358 | View Replies]

To: metmom

We disagree. But thank you for the post.


1,362 posted on 06/22/2010 11:10:10 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1361 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; RnMomof7; metmom; Quix; wmfights; boatbums; Iscool; small voice in the wilderness
A WONDERFUL sermon. Thank you for referencing it, but it's much better in its entirety. Especially the sentences before and after the few you plucked out at random. I'll highlight your lapse in blue..

MEEKNESS AND MERCY
by John Calvin

"...If we would only heed what nature teaches us we would enjoy the happiest state that humans could desire. For God has created all of us in his own image, so that we have only to look at our neighbour to see ourselves. We are one flesh. And although appearances and attitudes are very different, it is impossible to efface the unity which God has conferred on us. If only that were firmly etched in our minds, we would all be living at peace with each other, in a kind of earthly paradise.

The opposite, however, is the case. Everyone around us follows his own interests and looks to his own advantage; everyone wants to lord it over others. Hence our pride, our surliness, our venom the instant we are provoked. Harshness and even cruelty abound. We are vindictive and cause no end of trouble: it is as if lightning should fall from heaven every time someone is offended. So if in the course of life we endure many difficulties, we do not have to look far for the explanation: the pain men suffer comes from their fellow men. It is, of course, true that people all have their excuses. They want nothing better, they say, than to be gentle and mild-mannered, and to show patience toward those among whom they live. But, they add, it is not possible to deny our human nature: we must hunt with the hounds, because to be a sheep is to risk becoming someone else's dinner. That, then, is the excuse usually offered by men to cloak their actions. In reality so full are they of bitterness, arrogance, and pride that they cannot abide one another. It is all the more fitting, then, that we remember the lesson which the Son of God has for us here. For although we think we are hard done by when we cannot retaliate against those who ill-treat us, he tells us that it is the peace-makers and the meek who will possess the earth...

Amen. A terrific sermon. I hope you read all of it.

1,363 posted on 06/22/2010 11:26:14 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1354 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Quix; metmom; small voice in the wilderness; RnMomof7; boatbums; wmfights
Can you name a “doctrine of demons” in the “RCC Catechism”?

The doctrine of transubstantiation.

The doctrine of the Assumption of Mary.

The doctrine which views the priest as an "alter Christus."

The doctrine that bestows infallibility on a pope and his magisterium.

The doctrine that elevates tradition to the level of Scripture.

Yadayadayada...

These doctrines do not come from God's word. They are anathema to Christianity.

"That God's word damns your ceremonies it is evident; for the plain and straight commandment of God is, 'Not that thing which appears good in thy eyes shalt thou do to the Lord thy God, but what the Lord thy God has commanded thee; that do thou; add nothing to it; diminish nothing from it.' Now unless you are able to prove that God has commanded your ceremonies, this his former commandment will damn both you and them." -- John Knox (Knox, Works, 1:199. Cf. Calvin, The Necessity of Reforming the Church, in Tracts, 1:128-29.)

If not "demons," close enough.

1,364 posted on 06/22/2010 11:35:17 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1358 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Amazingly, we disagree.


1,365 posted on 06/22/2010 11:40:53 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1364 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
... and to illustrate this lovely "debate":


1,366 posted on 06/22/2010 11:47:08 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy

Noted.

Thanks!


1,367 posted on 06/23/2010 1:46:36 AM PDT by Gamecock (If you want Your Best Life Now, follow Osteen. If you want your best life forever, don't. JM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1221 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Dr. Eckleburg
Nor do we worship scripture, only God in Three Persons, Blessed Trinity.

You forgot Mary and every 2-bit "Saint" that comes down the road, as well as religious tokens and a wide variety of other trinkets.

Roman Catholicism is polytheism at it's finest...er..worst.

1,368 posted on 06/23/2010 1:51:51 AM PDT by Gamecock (If you want Your Best Life Now, follow Osteen. If you want your best life forever, don't. JM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1223 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; GiovannaNicoletta; Godzilla; ...

Doctrines of demons in the RCC?

1. APPROX 99.7% OF THE CARICATURED MARIAN DOGMA.

2. That Salvation is partly by works.

The rest will likely have to wait until I’ve waded through the Catechism.

Perhaps Dr E or some of my Bros, Sis. above would have some discernment on that.


1,369 posted on 06/23/2010 2:39:41 AM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1358 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; GiovannaNicoletta; Godzilla; ...

Is that a

POSTING POLICE mentality again?

One of our Sisters or the group was assaulted with an allegation of rudeness. I thought it hilariously hypocritical and another example of the RC BRAZEN DOUBLE STANDARD. I think it’s fitting for our little Proddy group to consider those issues.

I didn’t and don’t think it was necessary to get MOTHER SUPERIOR’S PERMISSION, first.


1,370 posted on 06/23/2010 2:44:14 AM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1357 | View Replies]

To: Titanites; Dr. Eckleburg; metmom; RnMomof7
DREAM ON--IN DENIAL, OCEANIC QUANTITIES OF HUBRIS, RANK HYPOCRISY . . .

BTW, DID !YOU! PERSONALLY TRULY BELIEVE THAT QUIX THOUGHT HE WAS AUTHORING OR MODIFYING SCRIPTURE WITHIN THE BRACKETS?

I guess I'll have to format them differently or use "{}" to signify my own interpretation.

.
.
.

Y'all
INSERT
YOUR WORDS,
YOUR BRAZENLY
UNSCRIPTURAL
FANTASIES
INTO SCRIPTURE

AS THOUGH
YOUR WORDS
WERE
ORIGINAL SCRIPTURE
ITSELF
--
ALL THE TIME!
***WITHOUT***
HAVING THE INTEGRITY
OF
BRACKETS
OR
ADMITTING IT
TO ANY DEGREE
IN ANY WAY!

Y'ALL INSIST THAT
"FULL OF GRACE"
EQUALS
"QUEEN OF HEAVEN,"
"DISPENSER OF
ALL
GRACES,"
"!MEDIATRIX!"
"!RULER OF HELL!"
"!THE TREE OF LIFE!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
. . .
EQUALS
"SPOUSE OF HOLY SPIRIT,"
"!COMPLEMENT OF THE MOST AUGUST TRINITY!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
. . .
EQUALS
"THE DAWN OF GOD,"
"!VANQUISHER OF SIN!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
. . .
EQUALS
"THE !ONLY 'AVENUE' TO GOD!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
. . .
EQUALS
'SALVATION CONDUIT'
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
. . .
EQUALS
"SAVIOR OF SOULS"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}
. . .
EQUALS
"'PARTICIPATOR' IN THE
INFINITE SANCTITY OF GOD!"
{!WHAT BLASPHEMY!}

I'm CERTAIN y'all were 100% convinced that Quix thought he was AUTHORING ORIGINAL SCRIPTURE within the "[]" brackets! /SARCASM TO THE MAX.

So, PLEASE TELL US,
IN YOUR OWN VIEW
which of the methods
DEPICTED ABOVE
LACKS INTEGRITY,
LACKS HONESTY,
IS DECEPTIVE,
AND WHICH DOES NOT?

SHEESH!

The STATION OF THE WHITE HANKY DOGMA

OF INFINITE OBTUSENESS, INFINITE HYPOCRISY, INFINITE IRONY, STRIKES FROM THE VATICAN YET AGAIN!

1,371 posted on 06/23/2010 3:45:00 AM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1359 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

You forgot Mary and every 2-bit “Saint” that comes down the road, as well as religious tokens and a wide variety of other trinkets.

Roman Catholicism is polytheism at it’s finest...er..worst.


INDEED.

Given the quality of the duplicitous rants . . . it looks to me like some folks would do better going back to sucking their teaspoon of sugar in a white hanky.


1,372 posted on 06/23/2010 3:47:55 AM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1368 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
For we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15)

Mark, Christ did not have to go up to the mountain to be tempted as we are. He lived on this earth and was, as we all are, tempted daily.

This was a direct respnse to the fall.

I'm glad that you have selected some non Trinitarian verses here. Thank you for posting some evidence. Perhaps the good Dr. E. might be impressed with your handiwork.

God made Paul the primary teacher of the new church, Paul wrote exactly what the Holy Spirit inspired him to . If anyone has a problem with that..that is their eternal problem

1,373 posted on 06/23/2010 3:48:49 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1200 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

“Amazingly, we disagree.”


UNDERSTATEMENT OF THE YEAR AWARD.


1,374 posted on 06/23/2010 3:49:56 AM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1365 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Dr. Eckleburg
St. Paul WAS a bit loony (a word that you used first, on this thread). Too bad Calvin picked up the worst of St. Paul and made of it a vicious sect. And I doubt St. Paul had any idea of trinitarianism, he was so fixed on his vision. But he certainly did uphold the importance of works at the judgement, along with other passages of scripture which do the same. Those verses of his which show that are posted here.

Judith, Paul was hand selected by Christ.. Paul had been ordained to be the church's 1st teacher.

I am sorry that the words of Paul make Catholics and some protestants uncomfortable.. but that is not the issue of the one quoting him..it is an issue with the Holy Spirit that inspired them...Peter said that Pauls words were inspired scripture. The church said his words are inspired.. so anyone that has a problem with Pauls teachings needs to complain to God that He is not a God of their liking , they woud prefer a different doctrine.or a different God

1,375 posted on 06/23/2010 3:55:34 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1207 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
You said this to an earlier post

RN>>>"Does the church not teach that the sacraments give grace?" NL answers .... No.

That answer was wrong , so I corrected it..

I am told the church NEVER changes its doctrine.. so the OLD Baltimore Cat.. is still true right?

Now read what you

the sacraments confer the grace that they signify. They are efficacious because in them Christ himself is at work: it is he who baptizes, he who acts in his sacraments in order to communicate the grace that each sacrament signifies.

Sees to me that says your answer was wrong as well... I like the Baltimore Catechism because all the flowery language is cut out.. you get right to the doctrine..

Did you know the efficacy of the sacrament is determined by the INTENT of the priest? So my friend you may have been baptized or confirmed or confessed sin or received communion.without benefit.. it is all about the priest..

1,376 posted on 06/23/2010 4:07:06 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1234 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; MarkBsnr; Titanites
Did you know the efficacy of the sacrament is determined by the INTENT of the priest? So my friend you may have been baptized or confirmed or confessed sin or received communion.without benefit.. it is all about the priest..

I'm pretty sure that is wrong. A perfect God supplies sacramental grace, not an imperfect sinful human.

1,377 posted on 06/23/2010 5:32:14 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1376 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Which one is Quix?


1,378 posted on 06/23/2010 5:32:49 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1366 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; Dr. Eckleburg; boatbums; Quix; Iscool; wmfights; Alex Murphy
the council of Jerusalem and [the Epistle to G]alatians condemns [sic] Judaizers

They do (so deos the Epistle to Romans, which you think procvlaims Sola Fide). Judaizers are those who think that it was necessary for Catholic Christian converts to become legally Jews first. The Chruch condemned them, yet a new breed of these found a home among the Evangelicals in 20c.

There is no priesthood, no papacy , no apostolic succession in the NT church as found in the scriptures.

Please re-read the thread from the beginning so you can educate yourself. All thise things are whollty scriptural; better so than the counterscriptural foolishness of Protestantism.

1,379 posted on 06/23/2010 5:38:43 AM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1051 | View Replies]

To: Quix; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; GiovannaNicoletta; Godzilla
Certainly their [of the old Hebrew saints] obedient actions flowed OUT OF their faith

So both faith and their righteous works saved them. He always mentions both.

1,380 posted on 06/23/2010 5:40:28 AM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,341-1,3601,361-1,3801,381-1,400 ... 2,421-2,436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson