Normally this would be entirely too weird for me to address, but your post 535 to Mad Dawg’s post 531 sort of makes your statements in 542 (and everywhere else) seem kind of strange.
With that in mind, please elaborate on the truth you found in 531. I also saw a lot of truth in that post and I’m confounded that a post which makes an effort to refute most of what you’ve stated is something with which you appear to be in agreement.
LOL.
If you think that even as a psychologist
I have the capacity to
effectively help most RC’s hereon understand such complex workings of the mysterious ultra-dimensional space between my ears
. . . then you must be seriously mis-assuming.
I don’t know that I’ll get back to that post in that degree at all.
I believe Mad Dawg wrote a number of valid general assertions in that post. I’m happy to agree with him, when, in good conscience, I can.
RC’s seem to have a horrendous time jumping to conclusions and misconstruing all manner of data way beyond reality.
That’s usually not a wise idea with my pontifications.
It often seems like MOST RC’s hereon ASSUME that virtually all Proddys hereon
are knee jerk hostile, flushing, dismissive etc. to 110% of everything Vatican related.
I’m not. I like to call a spade a spade. That’s how I was reared and been practicing it a long time.
However, I also believe in honestly affirming what is affirmable, in clear conscience . . .
even, horror, in the RC camp.