In Christ Alone (Happy reformation day)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExnTlIM5QgE ^ | Getty, Julian Keith; Townend, Stuart Richard;

[mlizzy]

Remember there was no 'institution" of the Lords Supper when He said that

Yes, I realize that, thank you; I love the passage and consider it a preview.:)

There is only one tragedy in the end, not to have been a saint -- Leon Bloy.

Anyone who studies the lives of the saints and blesseds (the amazing hardships they endured with joy for Jesus), will understand the power behind the Eucharist. It really is that simple.

[Quix]

INDEED.

WELL PUT.

[count-your-change]

“It is not lost altogether: it is the body of knowledge that tells us, for example, that Mary was virgin all her life, that the Church understood the nature of baptism and the Eucharist exactly how we understand it today; that prayers for the dead and to the saints are an integral part of worshiping God, — all that which we know as the Holy Tradition of the Church”

This argument, that what was unrecorded now forms the traditions of the Catholic church, is a cover that has been made before but is so obviously in error.
What was unrecorded was in agreement with what WAS recorded and those apostate Traditions above are in opposition to Scripture.

What to do, what to do??? In order to support the tradition appeal is made to the uninspired books of the apocrypha and fallible, often confused men, so called “Church Fathers”.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

However, the Church being a collective of people dedicated to the preservation of the faith certainly had knowledge of things that happened yet were not recorded at the time.

lol. Rome believes what's NOT in the Scriptures.

That about says it all.

[stfassisi]

No response to post 2381?

[presently no screen name]

Laugh very hard and wait for the next pope. We know our faith.

Catholics WON'T be laughing at your their pope. It will be an eye-opening time and maybe even some gnashing of teeth. IOW, time to reap what one has sown.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

OR: Scripture teaches us all we need.

But that assertion is not in the scripture.

Wow. Read your Bible, annalex.

Try 2 Timothy 3:15-17.

[Quix]

INDEED.

I’d imagine that God would have insured that her body was not worshiped . . . perhaps as He did Moses.

[Quix]

It is not possible to establish history with fiction. Repitition of a lie is nothing more than a lie repeated.

---

ABSOLUTELY INDEED.

And now, there is software available to take out portions of a

LIVE VIDEO FEED in split seconds . . .

so even live video feeds are no longer reliable evidence of anything.

[Quix]

Well put.

[Quix]

And around and around the Vatican playground the Catholics go. And everywhere that Mary went deception was sure to follow.

---

LOL.

At least she was into polyandry and had a hubby on each arm to escort and support her.

Or, maybe we should say . . . she was into bigamy?

[Quix]

Well done.

[Quix]

It is like talking to a wall ...The pope says there was always a papacy and he is infallible (because he says so) therefore if he says it , it must be true..even though history says something else all together .

When the blind lead the blind they all Literally all fall into the pit

---

ABSOLUTELY INDEED.

[Quix]

I’m really beginning to think that there is no REAL beginning to any of this. Like ooze rising from the swamplands, it’s just suddenly there.

---

INDEED.

But that’s pretty standard

for

the Vatican Alice in Wonderland School of Theology and Reality Mangling.

That’s one of the purposes of all the White Hankys—to mop up all that oooooooozzzzzzzzing.

[Religion Moderator]

Don’t bring arguments from thread to thread.

[Quix]

Hmmmm

. . . that Peter’s bones bred like rabbits?

. . . that Peter’s bones were into automatic cloning?

. . . that Peter’s bones ‘got around?’

. . . kind of like all the unhistorical nonsense about Peter.

[bkaycee]

Catholics WON'T be laughing at your their pope. It will be an eye-opening time and maybe even some gnashing of teeth. IOW, time to reap what one has sown.

They were'nt laughing the last time it happend in 1870 when Pius decided he wanted to be infalible and split the church,

He stacked the deck with over 300 pensioned Bishops who voted for their meal ticket and rubber stamped him infallible. The purposely under represented opposition was virtually ignored in this sham of a council.

[Quix]

ABSOLUTELY INDEED. WELL DONE.

[presently no screen name]

She needed a savior to preserve her from original sin

Nix that one, also. She was born before The Savior came.

Keeping that deception of Mary being born w/o original sin alive is why Catholics refuses to believe that everyone born after Adam/Eve was born into original sin.

The Vatican is responsible for such deception but for anyone to continue spreading that deception is just as responsible.

Going against God and His Word is, also,
going against the Holy Spirit who inspired His Word and, also,
going against Jesus, who is The Word doesn't give, those that do, any hope of living with Them for eternity.

In case you are unaware that ALL KNOWING God has a Word for the Vatican/RCC/Catholics, see this...

"Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13

You think He didn't know this would happen?

[mas cerveza por favor]

Nix that one, also. She was born before The Savior came.

She was born before the Savior was born, not before He existed.