Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear; markomalley; RJR_fan; The Theophilus; Lee N. Field; Dr. Eckleburg
ROFL Well, that shows what you really know about what prophecy really teaches. I would say that the Dome could well be gone after this year. While certainly not perfect, my understanding of prophecy is not the problem.

I freely admit that I cannot keep straight all the futurist theories about what may or may not happen when.

Trying to keep up with and debunk this futurist swill is like playing whack-a-mole. Just when you think you have one this one licked, another pops up over there.

17 posted on 01/05/2011 10:11:42 AM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- like crack for the eschatologically naive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: topcat54

It’s been my experience that every viewpoint out there has some truth built in but veers off to try to add to or reinforce their point of view. If they start from a pre conceived point of view they have no chance at truth. There are some on my side of the issue that I disagree on some things. It’s when I find an underlying principle that I begin to dismiss viewpoints. Preterism would be one I totally disagree with starting with the dating of Revelation. My name starts with Cynical for a reason.


19 posted on 01/05/2011 10:48:23 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: topcat54; CynicalBear
Trying to keep up with and debunk this futurist swill is like playing whack-a-Nephelim

Fixed it for ya.

A big part of the wild-eyed speculation I see these days revolves around supposed goings on WRT a nephelim resurgence. As if Jesus didn't tell us what "as in the days of Noah" meant.

20 posted on 01/05/2011 10:59:28 AM PST by Lee N. Field ("Dispensationalists say the darndest things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: topcat54; CynicalBear; markomalley; RJR_fan; Lee N. Field; Dr. Eckleburg
CB:"I would say that the Dome could well be gone after this year."
T"Trying to keep up with and debunk this futurist swill is like playing whack-a-mole."

I'm starting to feel sorry for them, since every one of their arguments is a losing argument filled with impossible scenarios (200,000,000 Chinese horsemen) to imagining that some entity is going to somehow replace the Dome with a Temple, not just this year, but any year.

First of all, what folks think is the Temple (Wailing/Western) Wall can't possibly be that because a wall requires one brick upon another which our LORD said was not the case. So the Futurists are lost and confused on the location due to lack of proper respect for Scripture and reason.

The Dome sits on the site of Fort Antonio, the original temple site is that gap to the south. The problem here is that one must desecrate a number of graves to build on the actual site. I'm going to provide the next LaHaye with a free plot-line element to build the new Temple (that God says is not build with human hands - another triviality dismissed by the Futurists)

The unaccounted TARP Billions is secretly given to the Palestinians so that they may buy land and outbid the Jewish settlers, thus allowing a somewhat strong market advantage to the Palestinians in procuring and occupying the alleged former Palestinian lands. As part of the deal, they make a covenant not to riot when the Zionists build a Temple to the south of the Dome. The person who brokers this deal is the Futurist's AntiChrist.

See how easy it is to craft semi-believable camp-fire stories when one first rejects Scripture?

21 posted on 01/05/2011 10:59:46 AM PST by The Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson