I don’t know if it would have qualified for caucus without the mention of Proddys, or not.
I, personally don’t think it would qualify with the last paragraph in.
I think it would be reasonable to have an RC caucus thread to talk about educating RC youth more effectively.
However, to drag Proddys into it—and not expect Proddys to respond—is not only against the caucus designation—it’s absurd.
Quix:
Ok, where exactly in the OP’s article was Protestantism or any particular group or sect of Protestantism specifically mentioned. If you can show me where, then you have a point based on the forums standards and guidelines.
For me, I never go into Mormon, Calvinist, Baptist, Joel Osteen, etc, etc, threads because what is the point, even when those are not labeled caucas threads.
The only time I do get into threads started by Protestants if those get into comparative theology and then it is obvious the point of the thread is to compare and contrast certain doctrinal differences, ie. the Catholic CHurch’s doctrine on sacraments vs. Anglican, Lutheran, Calvinist-Reformed, pentecostal, etc, etc.
If a Catholic OP posts and article that clearly sets out to disucss differences in Catholic vs Protestant doctrines on things like justification, authority, etc, then by all means, you all should have the right to respond.
But again, I don’t think the post by Marshmallow was a post that sat out to go into issues of Protestant church attendance, etc, etc.