Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: lastchance
The RM made the decision. I only asked why and stated why I thought it was non caucus. I honestly don’t recall any other time I have questioned one of the SS caucuses. I’ll gladly stand corrected.

Just couldn't leave something not involving your church alone.

43 posted on 02/22/2011 3:50:16 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights

It did not involve any specific church at all. That was my point. It discussed the increased hostility faced by Christian homeschoolers. If it had said Baptist or Reformed or Evangelical homeschooling parents I would not have asked why it was a caucus.

The RM is free to decide that mention of a homeschool magazine that has SS (please don’t be offened by the abbreviation I mean no disrespect.) is enough to put back the caucus designation I’m fine with that.

I did not ask about the status in order to give you any difficulty about your beliefs but only because I think it is an important topic that many faithful Christians agree on.


57 posted on 02/22/2011 3:57:06 PM PST by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: wmfights

“Just couldn’t leave something not involving your church alone.”

I guess you’ve never been on a thread about Catholicism then?


65 posted on 02/22/2011 4:02:35 PM PST by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: wmfights

INDEED.


71 posted on 02/22/2011 4:05:14 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson